Marx without Marxism


The ever expanding reading list

I've bought too many books, downloaded too many PDFs, bookmarked too many websites, subscribed to way too many blogs. But it all seems necessary and important, not to mention fascinating. And reading is a convenient way to avoid writing.

Nevertheless, yet another avenue of investigation has appeared and I really do need to go there.

A few weeks ago a friend mentioned in passing that he didn't think of himself as a Marxist anymore. For some reason this bothered me more than Christopher Hitchens' declaration that the socialist movement is dead. Hitchens at least still believes in Marx's method, historical materialism. I asked my friend when was the last time he read Marx. It had been a while. Then I admitted that it had been a long time for me as well, except for a look at Marx's writings on the American Civil War (which in fact the same friend had suggested as relevant to the current war in Iraq.)

It was in the 1970s that I read many of Marx's published works and was impressed with his critique of capitalist society. Since then I sat in on a couple of Marty Glaberman's classes on the first volume of Capital and I read several other writers who considered themselves Marxists. But it has been over a decade since I last seriously looked at the arguments in favour of socialist revolution.

So I want to go back and read the classics. But I also want to see what's going on in the current debate about Marx's relevance. Three items have already caught my eye.

1. Normblog has a series, Writer's Choice, which started with a review of Capital by Francis Wheen.

The first volume of Capital has quotations from the Bible, Shakespeare, Goethe, Milton, Voltaire, Homer, Balzac, Dante, Schiller, Sophocles, Plato, Thucydides, Xenophon, Defoe, Cervantes, Dryden, Heine, Virgil, Juvenal, Horace, Thomas More and Samuel Butler – as well as allusions to horror tales about werewolves and vampires, German chap-books, English romantic novels, popular ballads, songs and jingles, melodrama and farce, myths and proverbs.

Capital has spawned countless texts analysing Marx's labour theory of value or his law of the declining rate of profit, but only a handful of critics have given serious attention to Marx's own declared ambition to produce a work of art. One deterrent, perhaps, is that its multi-layered structure evades easy categorization. The book can be read as a vast Gothic novel whose heroes are enslaved and consumed by the monster they created ('Capital which comes into the world soiled with gore from top to toe and oozing blood from every pore'); or as a Victorian melodrama (in his 1962 study The Tangled Bank: Darwin, Marx, Frazer and Freud as Imaginative Writers, S.E. Hyman even proposes an apt title for the drama: The Mortgage on Labour-Power Foreclosed); or as a black farce (in debunking the 'phantom-like objectivity' of the commodity to expose the difference between heroic appearance and inglorious reality Marx is using one of the classic methods of comedy, stripping off the gallant knight's armour to reveal a tubby little man in his underpants); or as a Greek tragedy ('Like Oedipus, the actors in Marx's recounting of human history are in the grip of an inexorable necessity which unfolds itself no matter what they do,' C. Frankel writes in Marx and Contemporary Scientific Thought. 'And yet all that links them to this fate is their own tragic blindness, their own idées fixes, which prevent them from seeing the facts until too late'). Or perhaps it is a satirical utopia like the land of the Houyhnhnms in Gulliver's Travels, where every prospect pleases and only man is vile: in Marx's version of capitalist society, as in Jonathan Swift's equine pseudo-paradise, the false Eden is created by reducing ordinary humans to the status of impotent, alienated Yahoos.

Had Marx wished to produce a straightforward text of classical economics he could have done so - and in fact he did. Two lectures delivered in June 1865, later published as Value, Price and Profit, give a concise and lucid précis of his theories about commodities and labour. So why is Capital, which covers the same ground, so utterly different in style? A clue can be found in one of the very few analogies he permitted himself in Value, Price and Profit, when explaining his belief that profits arise from selling commodities at their 'real' value and not, as one might suppose, from adding a surcharge. 'This seems paradox and contrary to everyday observation,' he writes. 'It is also paradox that the earth moves round the sun, and that water consists of two highly inflammable gases. Scientific truth is always paradox, if judged by everyday experience, which catches only the delusive nature of things.'


Here is the whole review.


2. I've been working my way through the archives of Counago & Spaves and came across this 3 part essay in the journal Aufheben, from the Brighton and Hove Unemployed Workers Centre:

Capitalism, it is said, is a world system that was mature in the Nineteenth Century, but has now entered its declining stage. In our view this theory of capitalist decline or of the decadence of capitalism hinders the project of abolishing that system.

If you have ever belonged to a Marxist organization this may hit home. It is possible we may have capitalism to kick around for quite a while yet, especially with all those potential new markets in China and India.


3. The last item is also from Counago & Spaves where John is a big fan of Cornelius Castoriadis of the French radical group, Socialisme ou Barbarie. He reports that NotBored! has made available several English translations of works by Castoriadis. John's enthusiasm is infectious and I've started reading The Rising Tide of Insignificancy. Castoriadis used to be an advocate of workers councils, as opposed to the Leninist vanguard party. Then he left Marxism altogether and developed his own philosophy of autonomy. What I have found most useful so far are his views on Athenian democracy. As an old factory worker I too harbour some doubts about the sufficiency of shop floor populism, the Hungarian Revolution notwithstanding.


So I've got more reading to do. And maybe someday I'll get back to that novel I promised to write; the juvenile science fiction cross between Every Cook can Govern by CLR James and Robert Heinlein's Starship Troopers.

For now I am going to contemplate the words of the master himself, who strongly felt that ideology was no substitute for the study of history.

"All I know is that I am not a Marxist." - Karl Marx

Posted: Tue - August 23, 2005 at 09:03 AM          


©