|
| Kneelers? | | Date Created: Jun 26, 2003, 02:51 PM |
The following "argument" comes from a letter from a Reformed elder. The name of the church has been changed to protect the innocent.A couple years ago, the Doe Presbyterian Church, pastored by John Doe, installed kneelers in its auditorium. Last year, while teaching Sunday School, our pastor defended the installation and use of kneelers, on the grounds that kneeling is an acceptable posture for prayer. True, kneeling is an acceptable posture for prayer, but the propriety of kneelers, not the propriety of kneeling, is the issue. If a congregation wishes to kneel for prayer, it can do so without kneelers, and many do. I grew up in a church in which the congregation frequently kneeled for prayer--without kneelers, simply by kneeling at their seats or pews. There are good reasons why our Reformed forefathers removed kneelers from, or refused to install kneelers in, Reformed church buildings: The purpose and effect of kneelers are not to enable the congregation to kneel in prayer (they can do that anyway, if they wish), but to kneel before the wine and the bread, the "altar," the cross, and the priest officiating up front, in violation of the Second Commandment. That is why kneelers are commonly found in Catholic, Anglican, and similar church buildings, and absent from Reformed church buildings. This might be funny if the author wasn't so dead serious. That a grown man, and an elder in a Reformed church would propound such an argument is disturbing. Apparently, one can kneel on the floor without bowing down to the bread and wine, but do so on a cushioned kneeler and it's idolatry. Amazing. Sad. |
|