Should you be closing your wireless network?
to broadcast your SSID or
not...
It use to be useful, but closing your Airport or
wireless network (sometimes referred to as not broadcasting your SSID) is really
no longer a real option when it comes to wireless
security.
Unfortunately "Closed"
networks, MAC access control lists, and reduction in transmission power are all
more "feel good" security rather than real security. All these various
approaches are dated and mistakenly lead to overconfidence.
WPA is your friend if you value
wireless security.
My recommendation is
not to worry about broadcasting your SSID but use WPA. This will be more secure
than a closed WEP encrypted network. Closing your network makes it very
difficult for neighbouring networks to see which channels are free thus causing
potential interference problems.
Another
thing to consider is that a closed network is still broadcasting and therefore
is detectable (regardless of whether it is broadcasting a SSID). If someone was
determined to hack into your network, then not broadcasting your SSID and MAC
address access control is not going to stop them.
WPA is virtually uncrackable (only
really vunerable to a dictionary attack if a real word is used as a password)
and therefore will stop the casual user and the determined hacker.
If you are really worried, don't use
wireless just use wires.
For most newbies
to wireless networking, not broadcasting an SSID and or MAC address filtering
will only complicate matters especially if they are already having problems.
Therefore if you are having problems with your wireless network, my suggestion
will always be use WPA and leave it at that, the wireless network will be
secure.
Posted: Thu - March 24, 2005 at 05:08 PM
|
|