Please note, these are my observations, opinions and frustrations. This is an issue of "Who is the customer here and who gets to decide what quality of product is acceptable for a particular price?"
I wrote to the yarn company (frabjous fibers in Vermont, USA - added at the request of some readers. Since the I am stating only fact and have the paper trail, I feel confident I'm not breaking any "rules.") regarding the problems I had with five breaks in one ball of their yarn. I received a response telling me that I should, in essence, overlook the issues because their workers are so poor they can't afford not to sell a ball of yarn to the company and that they have hand spindles and that's why it happens. What kind of logic is this?
Oh, and she offered to send me more yarn. Doesn't this take even more money from the mouths of those poor second world people who are spinning it? And this is supposed to make me feel good?
I told her to keep the yarn and buy a worker a good meal. Not only did she not address the issue, she made certain I will NOT be buying any of the company's yarns again. I suspect this company is making a pretty good amount of money on each $15 ball of yarn it sells - probably far more than the poor spinner. Maybe they should send more of that money to the spinners. Maybe they should invest in charkas so the spinners could make the yarn faster and better. Maybe purchasers of this yarn would be willing to pay $1 more a ball to enable this. It's my experience that fiber artisans are a generous lot and would be willing to, for the most part, pay the difference.
Now, I'm wondering how many of these handspun/hand dyed specialty yarn companies are doing exactly the same thing. It doesn't make me comfortable.
I'm in the happy circumstance of being able to pay a pretty hefty price for yarn, if I like it enough. I know that not everyone is in that position. But, that being said, it's the way of all things. There are some gorgeous yarns out there that sell for $75 and $100 and $150 a ball. I don't feel comfortable paying that much for yarn, so I don't - but SOMEBODY is or the companies wouldn't be still making it. So, there's a yarn for everyone. It's no different than some people having a steak budget and others a hamburger budget. It's also a matter of choices. All this being said, I'm the one footing the bill and I'm the one who gets to decide if the yarn is up to my "snuff," or not.
I can't change all the world. I can't stop all the opportunistic business practices occurring in third world countries. All I can do is make changes where I can see the injustices. So, I will buy other yarn. I may be buying other yarn made in the very same way and, if I find out about it, I'll change my buying practices again.
I may end up buying only commercially spun yarns and spinning my own specialty yarns. I won't be paying someone else 5 cents an hour to spin it for me, though, and then selling it for $30 an hour.
I don't know why this is bothering me so much, but it is. I've refrained from mentioning the yarn company again because I feel so strongly about this.
Maybe I'll change my position later. If you see this article disappear, you'll know I've reconsidered. I just don't know how I can garner any enjoyment from the near slave labor of another human being AND KNOW ABOUT IT. Maybe I'd be better to hide my head in the sand.
The owner wrote back to tell me how these poor people are used to being poor and so, their quality control isn't as good as it might be. They're, after all, used to being poor and conditions being bad. So, I suppose that absolves the yarn company of having its OWN quality control. Also, it says, in effect, that poor people can only make poor stuff. Give me a break.
She also informs me that, "Hey lady we're the good guys." As opposed to what? AND, she's writing to me on her HP computer, made a country other than ours by underpaid workers. I wonder if she's aware that not all technology workers in other countries ARE poorly paid, nor are they poor. The silicon is imported more cheaply into some of the eastern countries than it is here, raw materials more readily available and, therefore, its cheaper to get them made there. Also, don't call me "lady."
Now, this company says they're a "fair trade" company, meaning people are paid a "fair wage." I wonder what a "fair wage" is considered to be?
I may have the company wrong, but the attitude toward a customer who, ultimately, pays the worker in Nepal sucks. Even if I'm wrong, how does anyone get off calling a customer "lady" in the tone that was implied by her reply? Also, I don't care to be "educated" by a U.S. yarn company that feels it's more important to promote the "fair wage" of a woman in a country that routinely undervalues female production. She may very well be WORSE off for spinning this yarn. I've heard stories from people I know from third world countries where the woman gets beaten (often by family members) for not producing ENOUGH product or for not finishing what the males in the household felt was more important. AND, there are a lot of folks here at home who are undervalued and underpaid, as well.
This woman also informed me it only costs about ten US dollars to buy a charka when I suggested a way of helping would be to supply them at about 100 US dollars. Now, tell me, how do you judge the "inequity" in pay or level of poverty when someone in Nepal can buy for ten US dollars what I have to pay 100 US dollars? So, if she gets 50 cents an hour, is that the equivalent of five US dollars an hour? And is everything else in Nepal the same depressed price to purchase?
What I do know is there are women here in the mountains and in the ghettos of cities and who are victims of hurricanes or other natural disasters who could, certainly, benefit from the charity being provided to those in Nepal.
In my opinion, until we get our own house in order, we shouldn't be meddling in the houses of others.