20 September 2009
Edinburgh postponement
23/09/09 21:37 Filed in: Housekeeping
note
Hi everyone -
Only time for a quick note today to say that my social media seminar in Edinburgh on 28 October has been postponed until probably the New Year, due to clashing commitments.
If you've already booked I'll be in touch directly.
Thanks
Guy
Only time for a quick note today to say that my social media seminar in Edinburgh on 28 October has been postponed until probably the New Year, due to clashing commitments.
If you've already booked I'll be in touch directly.
Thanks
Guy
0 Comments
Is your Facebook gay?
21/09/09 13:24 Filed in: Social
networking trends
Now this is hilariously stupid. the Daily Telegraph,
often a respected newspaper in the UK, has published
a report based on scientific
findings (COUGH) that suggests you can tell
whether someone is gay by looking at their
Facebook 'friends'. Apparently,
the higher per centage of your followers are
gay, the more likely you are to be gay yourself.
So hold on, this research is now saying I can't associate with homosexual men without everybody jumping to scientifically-evidenced conclusions? I'm not persuaded by this. I haven't actually audited the male/female balance of my online contacts but I can assure you I'd remain male regardless of the outcome of any such check; I don't honestly think the sexuality of my contacts would have any bearing on my own either. Come to think of it, unless I've actually met them with a partner I don't think I actually know the sexuality of many of my contacts. I'm an unfriendly git like that, what can I tell you?
The other thing that bothers me about this new research is that it works only on gay men. Lesbians and bisexuals, sorry and all that, but apparently you're undetectable by your Facebook pals, it's only gay men who stand out. Which, to me, makes the whole exercise a little bit value-less.
In fact I'm straining my brain more than a little trying to work out why I'd need to know a contact's sexuality in the first place...
So hold on, this research is now saying I can't associate with homosexual men without everybody jumping to scientifically-evidenced conclusions? I'm not persuaded by this. I haven't actually audited the male/female balance of my online contacts but I can assure you I'd remain male regardless of the outcome of any such check; I don't honestly think the sexuality of my contacts would have any bearing on my own either. Come to think of it, unless I've actually met them with a partner I don't think I actually know the sexuality of many of my contacts. I'm an unfriendly git like that, what can I tell you?
The other thing that bothers me about this new research is that it works only on gay men. Lesbians and bisexuals, sorry and all that, but apparently you're undetectable by your Facebook pals, it's only gay men who stand out. Which, to me, makes the whole exercise a little bit value-less.
In fact I'm straining my brain more than a little trying to work out why I'd need to know a contact's sexuality in the first place...