<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="iBlog 1.4.5" -->
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title> <![CDATA[Gravitational Pull]]> </title>
    <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog</link>
    <description> <![CDATA[Pressman's irregular commentary on politics, tech and the blogosphere.]]> </description>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <webMaster>gravitate@mac.com</webMaster>
    <copyright>&#169; Aaron Pressman</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:52:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:52:30 -0500</pubDate>
    <generator>iBlog 1.4.5</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Moving the site  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20051213085209/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">Moving to a new platform, new host, new emphasis...go <a href="http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/" target="NewWindow">here</a> from now on.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">NEW RSS FEED: http://gravitationalpull.net/wp/?feed=rss2  (but it'll be full of old entries migrating for a while)</font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:52:09 -0500</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20051213085209/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Cleaning up RSS feeds with Shrook  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1515880128/E20051019135232/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">I continue playing around with <a href="http://www.shrook.com" target="NewWindow">Shrook</a> as a possible replacement for <a href="http://www.bloglines.com" target="NewWindow">Bloglines</a>. This morning, I noticed that I could sort my entire library of feeds in the Shrook desktop reader application by the date that each was last updated. This turned out to be a useful exercise as buried amidst the worthy but infrequent posters like scifi author <a href="http://www.williamgibsonbooks.com/blog/blog.asp" target="NewWindow">William Gibson</a> and techno-weenie <a href="http://danbricklin.com/log/default.htm" target="NewWindow">Dan Bricklin</a> were feeds that had moved and/or died. I deleted the losers and reconnected with the movers as best I could (Wil Wheaton seems to have accidentally torched his <a href="http://www.wilwheaton.net/" target="NewWindow">normal blog</a> and the <a href="http://wilwheaton.typepad.com/" target="NewWindow">temporary blog</a> has no RSS feed I could discovery). </font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">I'm still <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1515880128/E20050922100336/index.html" target="NewWindow">awaiting</a> some promised enhancements to Shrook's online side. As of now, it's still a long and not terribly organized list of feeds with none of Bloglines niceties. </font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Review">Review</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Software">Software</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/RSS">RSS</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:52:32 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1515880128/E20051019135232/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Down goes Palm, yet another notch on Gates' belt  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050928110957/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>(Updated 9/28)</i></font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">The depressing <a href="http://www.mobileburn.com/news.jsp?Id=1669&amp;source=SIDEBARHOME" target="NewWindow">news</a> that a once innovative and leading software company has been vanquished by Microsoft is hardly surprising. Palm, now called PalmSource, revolutionized the "personal digital assistant" by shedding features and focusing on simplicity and a good user experience. Now it lives to see the day that its own hardware unit, called just Palm, dumps its operating system in favor of Microsoft's Windows Mobile 5.0 for an upcoming smart phone. I haven't used the latest version of Windows Mobile but in the past I have found Windows CE to be unwieldy, overly complex and slow (The new version appears to be only a smidge better, so says Rob Pegoraro in the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/24/AR2005092400219.html" target="NewWindow">Washington Post)</a>. It also doesn't play nice with Macs, though Palm has been up and down on that score since OS X came along. </font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">To a large degree, this week's news was just the icing on the cake --  last year Windows CE devices started outselling Palm-based gear and in the second quarter of 2005, Palm had just a 19% market share, half of its position a year earlier, according to Gartner. It did bring to mind those who were previously overtaken by the Redmond monolith and those who have thus far survived. I don't think there are simple rules to be derived from these two lists. Clearly execution is at least as important as strategy here and underlying market dynamics play a role too. </font><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>Update</b></font><font face="Helvetica">: Zdnet's Michael Singer has a <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/index.html" target="NewWindow">cogent piece</a> describing five missteps by Palm.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Surpassed:</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Apple (PC OS)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Wordperfect (word processor)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Lotus (spreadsheet)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Novell (networking/servers)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Netscape (browsers)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Borland (programming)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Adobe (fonts)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Palm (PDA OS)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">IBM/Lotus (enterprise email)</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Hanging on:</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Intuit (personal and business finance)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Google and Yahoo (search)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Sony (video games)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Research in Motion (mobile email)</font><br /><font face="Helvetica">Oracle (enterprise databases)</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Any other suggestions or notes from the peanut gallery?</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">As an aside, while researching this post, I came across a cool <a href="http://www.fortune.com/fortune/slideshow/0,,1053967,00.html" target="NewWindow">slide show</a> by Fortune magazine that displays when Microsoft's market share passed rivals Netscape (1998), Lotus 123 (1992) and Wordperfect (1992).</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Palm">Palm</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Software">Software</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Windows">Windows</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Microsoft">Microsoft</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Gadgets">Gadgets</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:09:57 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050928110957/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Don Adams, aka Agent 86, rest in peace  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C637276705/E20050927125541/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<img src="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C637276705/E20050927125541/Media/adams.jpg" height="80" width="80" alt="" /><div><br /><font face="Helvetica">Many were the half hours of my youth wasted away in front of the TV set and many were the laughs I got from Don Adams, secret agent Maxwell Smart. The Mel Brooks comedy "Get Smart" never failed to amuse my pre-adolescent brain and many of the show's regular bits, like the shoe phone and the malfunctioning cone of silence, became staples of our family's humor. So long and thanks for all the fish, Don.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Culture">Culture</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Television">Television</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Obit">Obit</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/donadams">Don Adams</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 07:55:41 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C637276705/E20050927125541/index.html</guid>
	  <enclosure url="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C637276705/E20050927125541/Media/adams.jpg" length="1605" type="image/jpeg" />

    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Is Shrook the great, hoped-for answer to reading RSS feeds?  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1515880128/E20050922100336/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>(Updated 9/23)</i></font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">I've been pretty happy keeping up with Blog RSS feeds using the online <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/public/AMPressman" target="NewWindow">Bloglines</a> service. It works from within any browser, updates feeds pretty frequently, lets me publish my subscription list on the web and allows easy export of my list for backup or to pull into another reader. The interface is excellent, allowing feeds to be filed into folders, clearily indicating when unread posts have arrived and so forth. But, you have to be connected to the Internet to read your feeds and that's a drag when you'd like to be able to catch up off-line. So RSS reader Nirvana would be an application that combined an online service with a typical computer application and that automatically synchronized between the two.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Thanks to an <a href="http://arstechnica.com/reviews/apps/newsreaders-mac.ars" target="NewWindow">article</a> at the excellent tech news site <a href="http://arstechnica.com/" target="NewWindow">Ars Technica</a>, however, I'm one step closer to the perfect reader. In a review of eight different reader apps, the article mentioned that <a href="http://www.fondantfancies.com/apps/shrook/" target="NewWindow">Shrook</a> combines both a stand-alone reader and a web site with auto-synchronization between the two. I immediately downloaded it. After a few hours of usage, I love the concept but the interface, especially on the web, needs a lot of work. I'm still getting the hang of it, though. More to come...</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Update: Developer Graham Parks emailed me to say that the web interface will include folders to match the stand-alone app in a future update. That would be a big improvement. Right now, the web version just lists all of your feeds, noting which have new and unread posts. That's one long list.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Review">Review</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Software">Software</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/RSS">RSS</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:30:36 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1515880128/E20050922100336/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Where have you gone Chuckie Weiss - New England turns its lonely eyes to you  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1003634779/E20050919143016/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">  <img src="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1003634779/E20050919143016/Media/images.jpg" height="71" width="106" alt="" />  </font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">There's a pink elephant in the room, <a href="http://www.patriots.com" target="NewWindow">New England Patriots</a> fans, and no one is mentioning it. After two performances that can only be characterized as lackluster or worse, the Pats are sorely missing former offensive coordinator Charlie Weiss, now head coach at Notre Dame. </font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">The evidence is everywhere. Who exactly was calling the plays in Sunday's debacle against the Carolina Panthers? With the opposition defense blitzing everything but the kitchen sink and swarming to attack the line of scrimmage,  where were the screen passes, the trick plays, the misdirections for which Master Weiss was so rightly famous? And it used to be the Pats who made smart half time adjustments to get the offense on track. Not this Sunday. In the last 56 odd minutes of the game, the Pats offense scored three points. No running game at all? And unlike the defense, the Pats don't have any player personnel excuses on O. The return of big, fast tight end Ben Watson was supposed to make Tom Brady's life easier. That hasn't happened as Big Ben has a total of 3 catches for 62 yards. Of course, Bill Belichick is a smart guy. Maybe he'll figure all this out -- and quick.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Meanwhile over at Notre Dame, even with Saturday's 3-point overtime loss, Charlie is kicking you know what...</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica"><a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Sports">Sports</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/football">football</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Patriots">Patriots</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:30:16 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1003634779/E20050919143016/index.html</guid>
	  <enclosure url="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1003634779/E20050919143016/Media/images.jpg" length="6369" type="image/jpeg" />

    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The future of Microsoft Office is not pretty  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050913174813/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">You almost have to laugh when Microsoft unveils <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/images/features/2005/09-13Office12-Word_lg.jpg" target="NewWindow">screen shots</a> of its next update in the creaky Office franchise. Just wait, just wait one more year, and we'll make Word really great. Really, really great. We promise. Based on the screen shots, it look more likely to cause head aches than upgrades. Somehow this mishmash of tabs and buttons and tool bars is supposed to be an improvement? What happened to simple and intuitive design? What happened to hiding complexity from the user? This just looks like a confusing mess. At least I don't see Clippy, the annoying talking paper clip from a couple of versions back. Oh, and there's no "classic" mode if you prefer the current incarnation, at least so they say now. Maybe a few of these "features" will be dropped before the final product is ready. I'm willing to learn from those who actually attended this unveiling to some degree, but wow - yuck.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">  <img src="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050913174813/Media/09%2d13Office12%2dWord_lg.jpg" height="272" width="755" alt="" /> </font><br /><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Office">Office</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Software">Software</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Windows">Windows</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Microsoft">Microsoft</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Rants">Rants</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:48:13 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050913174813/index.html</guid>
	  <enclosure url="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050913174813/Media/09%2d13Office12%2dWord_lg.jpg" length="104668" type="image/jpeg" />

    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Gruber's in rare form on iTunes 5  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050908205244/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">John Gruber's on a hilarious, <a href="http://www.hbo.com/entourage/" target="NewWindow">Entourage</a>-inspired <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2005/09/anthropomorphized" target="NewWindow">rant</a> about the wacky new user interface Apple put on the latest version of <a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/overview/" target="NewWindow">iTunes</a>. Make sure your mouth isn't full when you read it.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Mac">Mac</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Software">Software</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/iTunes">iTunes</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/OSX">OSX</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:52:44 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050908205244/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Working with the e815 and photos - oy vey  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050907084007/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">After a couple of weeks with my Verizon/Motorola <a href="http://www.motorola.com/motoinfo/product/details/0,,82,00.html" target="NewWindow">e815</a>, I have a few quirks and quibbles to report. Getting photos off the phone has been a mildly trying exercise since Verizon crippled the Bluetooth profile that would allow one to effortlessly and wirelessly move snapshots into iPhoto. You can upload photos to vzwpix.com, but once there they can be viewed and emailed but not downloaded (dragging and dropping a photo from the web site leaves you with a low resolution version of the image). So, okay, email -- you can email from the phone or the web site a "slide show" containing one to five pictures. I emailed myself a "slideshow" of one picture and was able to save the attached file as a photo and pull it into iPhoto at its full resolution (1280 by 1024 pixels). Given that the phone has no keyboard, typing email addresses is kind of a drag.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">So, I bought a 128 mb transflash card for the phone. Actually, I believe it has been </font><font face="Helvetica" color="Blue"><u>officially renamed</u></font><font face="Helvetica"> "microSD." This is a new and teeny-tiny flash memory card format, smaller than your fingernail, that fits in a slot in the top of the e815:</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">  <img src="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050907084007/Media/IMG_0112.jpg" height="125" width="167" alt="" />        <img src="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050907084007/Media/IMG_0119.jpg" height="125" width="167" alt="" />  </font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">A simple menu setting lets you save photos to the card instead of to the phone's own memory. When you want to move your new masterpieces over to your Mac, turn off the phone, </font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>carefully</i></font><font face="Helvetica"> extract the memory card, seat it in its SD card adapter, put the adapter into a card reader, connect to a Mac and - shazam - you can import to iPhoto.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Why so carefully? In my first reaction <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050823120450/index.html" target="NewWindow">review of the e815</a>, I wondered why Verizon allowed one to move photos off the phone on a memory card but not with Bluetooth. The answer, it seems, is a warning that accompanies the card --  due to delicate, small form factor the card is not meant to be removed and re-inserted frequently. The manufacturer, SanDisk, refers to the cards as "semi-removable." Makes one wish he had waited for a higher capacity card (transflash cards of 512 mb are listed as "out of stock" at Amazon and other sites). It also makes one wonder how great an MP3 music player the phone would be if you can only change the music on your card infrequently.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Another pet peeve -- while iSync on Tiger will synchronize phone numbers from your address book with the phone, it leaves email addresses off. This is mucho annoying as I just mentioned that typing addresses in with the numerical keypad is a pain. I'll test some of the iSync alternatives and see if any do a better job.</font><br /><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Gadgets">Gadgets</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Verizon">Verizon</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Cell+Phones">Cell Phones</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Mac">Mac</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Review">Review</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Photography">Photography</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:40:07 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050907084007/index.html</guid>
	  <enclosure url="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050907084007/Media/IMG_0112.jpg" length="12326" type="image/jpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050907084007/Media/IMG_0119.jpg" length="11567" type="image/jpeg" />

    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comparing Windows Vista and Mac OS X  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050831110426/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">The ever-thoughtful Paul Thurrott has a typically thoughtful and nuanced <a href="http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_beta1_vs_tiger_01.asp" target="NewWindow">comparison</a> of Windows Vista Beta 1 and Mac OS X Tiger. I don't agree with everything he says, but it's a useful and informative essay.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Mac">Mac</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Software">Software</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Windows">Windows</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Microsoft">Microsoft</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/OSX">OSX</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:04:26 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050831110426/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wasting away again in Panther-ita-ville  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050830090601/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">Om Malik is <a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/08/28/switch-back-to-panther-from-tiger/#more-4989" target="NewWindow">switching back</a> -- from Mac OS X 10.4 aka Tiger to Mac OS X 10.3 aka Panther. Problems with overheating Powerbooks, Mail and VPNs. As I said <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E1339875195/index.html" target="NewWindow">back in April</a>, you have to wait out the bugs, but it's a huge bummer that this many months past launch, I'm still stuck in Panther on my <a href="http://www.serialscifi.com/tools.html" target="NewWindow">main machine</a>.</font><br /><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Mac">Mac</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Software">Software</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Rant">Rant</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Tiger">Tiger</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/OSX">OSX</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:06:01 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050830090601/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Motorola e815 - best of a sorry lot at Verizon for Macs  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050823120450/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">  <img src="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050823120450/Media/e815moto.jpg" height="112" width="93" alt="" />   <a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/" target="NewWindow">Verizon</a> -- just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in. Years ago in New York City, I subscribed with Verizon Wireless but when I moved back to Massachusetts, they had little to offer in terms of cool phones that played nice with Macs and their prices were substantially higher than everyone else's. So I opted instead for AT&amp;T Wireless and a nifty <a href="http://www.sonyericsson.com/spg.jsp?cc=us&amp;lc=en&amp;ver=4000&amp;template=ps1_1&amp;zone=ps&amp;lm=ps1_1&amp;pid=9932" target="NewWindow">Sony Ericsson T68i</a> phone that I later upgraded to a very nifty <a href="http://www.sonyericsson.com/spg.jsp?cc=us&amp;lc=en&amp;ver=4000&amp;template=pp1_loader&amp;php=php1_10076&amp;zone=pp&amp;lm=pp1&amp;pid=10076" target="NewWindow">T616</a>. It had Bluetooth and was completely compatible with Apple's <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/isync/" target="NewWindow">iSync</a> software so I could import all my contacts from my laptop and update as necessary in a painless and rapid sync. For an additional fee, I also got metered Internet access at mediocre speeds (a little worse than dial-up) by using the T616 as a Bluetooth modem with my laptop. It was good enough for email but not Web surfing. Network coverage was so-so with big dead spots along my commute here in the Boston area.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Time passes, needs change. After signing up for Verizon's high-speed <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E508313739/index.html" target="NewWindow">wireless broadband</a> recently, the former AT&amp;T/now <a href="http://www.cingular.com/" target="NewWindow">Cingular</a> data service became superfluous. The cheap voice plan expired and my family already has a great Verizon family plan that could add me for just $10 a month. So when I saw that Verizon was finally offering a phone that could use iSync over bluetooth with my Mac, I threw in the towel and made the switch, acquring a <a href="http://www.motorola.com/motoinfo/product/details/0,,82,00.html" target="NewWindow">Motorola e815</a>. Getting my old phone number switched over was a breeze and 10 minutes after I left the Verizon store I could make and receive calls.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">So far I can say that Verizon's network coverage is second to none, that's for sure. But now my phone is only so-so. For one, it's kind of huge (about 10% wider and thicker and about one-third heavier than the T616). I can't remember carrying such a heavy cell phone in ages and it doesn't fit comfortably in a pants or shirt pocket as the T616 did. There is also the less-than-intuitive Motorola interface that requires lots of menu navigating to accomplish simple things. It appears, for example, that contact categories and speed dial assignments can only be changed on the phone through much laborious clicking and reassigning. Finally, there are the <a href="http://www.nuclearelephant.com/papers/v710.html" target="NewWindow">much publicized</a> and annoying Bluetooth limitations that Verizon has imposed -- you can't send photos or other files off the phone nor can you load ring tones and MP3s directly from your PC. You aren't supposed to be able to use the phone as a modem either although my phone does list an active dial-up networking profile that I haven't messed with.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">I don't mean to be completely negative. I like having a clamshell phone that answers and hangs up based on opening and closing. And the e815 does, as advertised, sync beautifully with OS X Tiger (not earlier versions) over Bluetooth. I added 100 contacts with several hundred numbers and email addresses with iSync 2.1 in just a few minutes. On a Mac running Panther (10.3.9), I was able to pair with the phone but not synch. The e815 also has a great camera, </font><font face="Helvetica-BoldOblique"><b><i>for a cell phone</i></b></font><font face="Helvetica">, with a maximum resolution of 1.3 megapixels and a built-in flash. The inside and outside screens are colorful and viewable in bright sunlight and the keypad is roomy and easy to use. It also has a built-in speakerphone and a memory card slot (some format I'm not familiar with called transflash) for storing photos and even MP3 music files. The memory slot kind of begs the question -- if you can use a card to transfer photos off the phone, why not allow Bluetooth moves? Alas, <a href="http://dts.vzw.com/faqs/Bluetooth/faq.html" target="NewWindow">no indication</a> from Verizon that any changes are in store. </font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Bottom line -- it's the only iSync compatible phone with Bluetooth offered by Verizon around these parts and it will do, at least until something better comes along.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Gadgets">Gadgets</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Verizon">Verizon</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Cell+Phones">Cell Phones</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Mac">Mac</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Review">Review</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:04:50 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050823120450/index.html</guid>
	  <enclosure url="http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050823120450/Media/e815moto.jpg" length="3531" type="image/jpeg" />

    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Google saves Outlook email search  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050823095352/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">Like many Mac users, I suppose, I must make do with a Windows XP box at work. Blah. But the true horror is being forced to use Microsoft Outlook, likely the worst email program I have ever seen. One of the very worst features is the brain-damaged search function that works like a snail in molasses, doesn't offer simple categories like "from" unless you click through to the advanced search and generally stinks. Needless to say, I'm spoiled by Apple Mail and even the Mac version of Outlook, called Entourage, is light years ahead (how can this be? I have no idea). </font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">In any event, my dreams have come true. I installed the new version of Google Desktop Search (<a href="http://desktop.google.com/" target="NewWindow">download here</a> -- Windows only) yesterday which includes an Outlook search add-in. Now I have insanely fast full-text search. I only wish the integration was a little better, as the results come up a separate browser window.  You can easily read all of the email results but you aren't in Outlook so you can't just select an email and hit reply to send a reply. None the less, I've become 16.43% more productive. The new sidebar feature on Google Desktop, however, couldn't seem to work through my office's proxy server/firewall/security. Oh well.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Mac">Mac</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Software">Software</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Review">Review</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Windows">Windows</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Google">Google</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:53:52 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1157898685/E20050823095352/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[LA Times in fine form  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C637276705/E20050818101705/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica">Reason number 4,327,119 to thank goodness for the Internet: I remember when reading an out-of-town newspaper meant driving to the one news stand in wherever and paying $5 for a daily, even more for a Sunday edition. Now one and all can enjoy the best papers on the web. Today's </font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>LA Times</i></font><font face="Helvetica"> is exhibit A, with interesting stories on the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-me-fairfax18aug18,1,4620027.story?coll=la-headlines-frontpage" target="NewWindow">decline</a> of the city's jewish business district, Dan Neil's entertaining review of the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/highway1/la-hy-neil17aug17,1,1562789.story?coll=la-news-highway_1" target="NewWindow">Chevy Cobalt SS</a>, a quick hit on Dreyer's (maker of Haagen Daz and other ice creams) noting that their "Frosty Paws" line of dog ice cream treats has <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-dogs18aug18,1,6883901.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-business" target="NewWindow">become their most profitable product,</a> and a winning profile of the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/sports/printedition/la-sp-redsox18aug18,1,3177136.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-sports" target="NewWindow">idiots of major league baseball</a> aka the Boston Red Sox. And who knew that <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-et-snoop18aug18,1,6902283.story?coll=la-headlines-frontpage" target="NewWindow">Snoop Dogg coached kids football</a>?</font><br /><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Subject tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Culture">Culture</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/Journalism">Journalism</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/LA">LA</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/redsox">Redsox</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:17:05 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C637276705/E20050818101705/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Feedster too  ]]></title>
      <link>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1515880128/E20050727172034/index.html</link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica"><a href="http://feedster.com/claimfeed.php?key=787716817eb7dcd6bb7eed6fd019cfd2">No Need to Click Here - I'm just claiming my feed at Feedster</a></font>&nbsp;</div> ]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:20:34 -0400</pubDate>
	  <guid>http://homepage.mac.com/gravitate/iblog/C1515880128/E20050727172034/index.html</guid>
	  
    </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>
