Nada Lives


“But then they danced down the streets like dingledodies, and I shambled after as I’ve been doing all my life after people who interest me because the only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue center light pop and everybody just goes ‘Awww!’” from
On the Road by Jack Kerouac, 1955.


Nada, nothing. In the beginning there was the void. The infinite chasm of nothingness. From this void all things, all of creation was sprung. Or so it is written. “The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao.”
Nada. Street of lost souls. Shades half living, half dead. The inebriation of the senses, rush of ghosts, invisible made visible. Slouching down to the Lower East Side. Looking for freedom where no one can touch you. Where they cannot find you. Cannot see you. Cannot control you. Land of neglect. The wasteland.
Nada. Abandoned storefront. Rivington Street. Sign on the door. Condemned. Landlord: the Lower East Side Renaissance Corporation. A punk kid slaps down his $1300 unemployment check. This space is the place. Casa Nada. The house of nothing. Out of nothing, the universe at his feet. House of no return. No turning back now. Enter the void.
Delusional. Grandiose. Catastrophic. Heroes are either courageous or they are fools. He was tending toward the latter. The hero. To stand apart. Like Ivan the Terrible’s Oprichnina, the “men apart.” The task, the challenge: to create something new, “cutting edge,” excellent. Ah, but it’s all been done before! But here… an alchemy of art. Pure gold from pure dung.
And lost to the dung-heap of history was a flourishing of creativity. Difficult to discern, especially for the uninitiated. A “scene,” a living scene that could have been a movie set. Not a mis en scene (scene within a scene), but more like Antonin Artaud’s mis en abyme (scene within the abyss). There was no script. Unscripted drama. Artists in the city. New York City. What was and possibly still is the creative center of our small corner of the known universe. Seething with discontent.
A constant struggle for survival itself. An empty beer can was worth a nickel. Twenty of them would buy another beer and a couple of bags of chips. We lived like this for years. No heat during winter in this cold Renaissance. No running water. Yet, we were in a constant state of celebration. Celebrating what? Celebrating the act of celebration itself. And occasionally, a rare moment, we’d even sell our art.
This was the action we made against the action that was made in another district, a mere two blocks north of us. The “East Village,” as it had come to be known, through the subtle manipulations of real estate dealers, had become, in our eyes, a haven for phonies, to quote the late and great poet and painter Yuri Kapralov, the “bullshit artists.” Of course, some would feel the same way about us, with all of our posturing and pretense. But, in a kind of “fuck you” act of nihilism, we did not “give a shit” about the East Village or even the New York art world.
We knew that the Oprichnina, the “men apart,” stood on their own terms and must be recognized on their own terms. For, even while the angry and disenfranchised artists rejected the mainstream, they yearned to be seen, to be recognized in their own right.

Dredging up the memories of a time nearly forgotten, amidst the pounding drums and thrash of guitars. A droning chant of punk rock music obliterates the senses, drowning the cavities of the mind where sinuous vestiges of the past reside. Wading through the detritus of age, ephemeral highs and lows of experience are the first to emerge. Stories of lovers enthralled, entwined in the heat of entangled longing, later wrecked and scattered , beached for eternity. These stories could be told from many a tangled angle. But, for truth to be told (whatever “truth” means) and for that truth to be told from the heart, these tales of fleeting romance must be heard. For the story of one’s life may be the story of one’s loves, ecstasy and the pain indelibly wrapped -up as one.
And wasn’t it for love that they beat upon their precious metal? Lashed out a frenzy of color onto bare canvas? Pounding their sheet metal noise and dubbing the cacophony “music?” Speaking, screaming, foaming at the mouth an unending tirade to the gods of delerium? Three women, three sirens, beckoning the drunken sailor to his fate, dashed on the rocks of a forgotten time. Three phases, three fates. The brief scene, etched into memory.
He missed the oeuvre, the first scene, the 99 nights on Rivington Street, 1983, act one. He was not there. Instead he had been alone, solitary. Simultaneous with the Rivington experiment at the No Se No social club was the initial outpouring of the burgeoning East Village art scene. Jim C.’s first show was on 10
th street in a dark storefront called the Limbo Lounge, adjacent to the quintessential East Village gallery, Gracie Mansion. The East Village in 1983, alongside the No Se No 99 nights, was a brief, exciting period where artists of all modes and mediums were able to emerge. This was the non-exclusive act one, the opening of the play.
The mise en scene was the East Village, the Lower East Side, after a decade of abandonment and decay. It was said that the police stopped short of First Avenue, leaving the reckless “wild east” to relative anarchy and lawlessness. This was a place where “anything could happen.” This was the place where the outlaw after hours clubs like the Limbo and the No Se No could flourish. Where “do it yourself” (DIY) was the word of the day. Where, if you wanted to be “in it” you simply did it, no holds barred.
He had met a woman, who was like a sorceress, whose ancient, though modern day frescoes were marked with inscriptions which spoke like the fates. They had met once more the night of Metta Madsen’s opening at Piezo Electric Gallery, then located on Clinton Street, just south of Avenue B. Suzie Strande had somehow wandered into his experimental performance and gallery space The Magic Gallery (the painter Edward Brezinski’s fifth floor walk-up tenement at Third Street and Bowery), during a poetry reading by Miguel Pinero a few weeks earlier. Sleeping on the floor of a friend’s studio, he was lost. Susan was his refuge.
Rounding the corner by Life Café, he ran into D.D. Chapin. Chapin knew that he was looking for a space where he could live, work and show the work of others. A storefront. This was the time of the East Village storefront gallery explosion. Run by, and largely for, artists
. The first wave, 1982-1983. Now it was August of 1984. The “first generation” artist run galleries of the East Village had been usurped by the influx of the more commercial and entrepreneurial second and third wave galleries. The atmosphere in the East Village had become less fluid, more business-like. The original verve of the scene was lost. This “new” East Village was a moribund simulacrum of the real East Village, of the art world insurrection, which gave it its birth. The rediscovery of Rivington Street, removed from the East Village by a mere two blocks, yet light years away from that village in its atmosphere and ambience, provided fertile ground for a re-enlivened artistic renaissance. Rivington was a place that was just enough off the map to again enable artists to thrive in relatively unfettered, unrestricted modes that were being lost in the “uptown” sector of the Lower East Side, the East Village.
The place was at 40 and 42 Rivington Street. Three storefronts in a row. The first was No Se No, the second, Freddie the Dreamer, the third, Casa Nada, later abbreviated , simply, to Nada. When Jim C. first opened the Nada, an artist named Buster Cleveland was living at No Se No, at 42 Rivington (figure 1).

bustercleveland8X10
1. Buster Cleveland at No Se No circa 1984 by Jim C.

Buster had been an instigation to Gracie Mansion during the pre-East Village days when East Village and Rivington artists like Ray Kelly, Arleen Schloss, Ed Higgins and others were more focused on the scene in Soho. In an interview Gracie Mansion and Sur Rodney Sur, directors of the Gracie Mansion gallery, vividly recollect their experiences with Buster Cleveland:
Sur: The gallery next door was Lisa Meyer. It was on the corner of West Broadway and Spring. That corner became a hangout for people like Buster Cleveland and Ed Higgins. They called it "the office." Réné ("I am the best artist") decided to do a magazine called The Office. He photographed us all on that corner called "the office."
Gracie: And then Buster had the idea of selling artwork out of the back of a limousine. We used to do these shows. Before then we would take over collectors' houses, bringing the artwork. Buster saw me as a dealer, that I was sort-of running this gallery. He pushed me into doing the gallery. Sur was doing shows at an animal hospital. This was in 1981. Buster said, "Let's do a limo show! Let's rent a limousine, park it on the corner of Spring and West Broadway, right by the 'office,' and sell for a couple of hours." So that was like a first gallery (Cornwell: Appendix, p. 252).

Buster was living in the storefront of No Se No, which had been shut down by the city after the 99 nights performance series of the summer of 1983. Buster’s incarnation of No Se no was the “Club Dada,” which he ran with Diane Siprelle. The opening Club Dada show was by invitation and Buster had invited Susan Strande. Jim C. did not know Buster until he had appeared on the Rivngton scene. Jim had been immersed in Latin American literature, and had also run a “Club Dada” himself, so he dubbed his new storefront at 40 Rivington the Casa Nada, Nada a conglomeration of No Se No and Dada. Permeated with the sensibilities, or more aptly, unsensibilities, of the Dada movement, the first choice for an art show at what some called “New Say Nada” was an experiment in chaos, dubbed the Anarchy Open Art Show. He posted a call to show art on the street, on crumbling buildings and even on derelict abandoned cars. The posters showed an image garnered from a book called the Secret Museum of Mankind, an early anthropological work that showed depictions of tribal people. He chose a picture that featured tribal hairstyles, with a caption to the effect that everyone was invited to bring their work, sight unseen, to the Casa Nada, where it would be hung on the wall and shown immediately. The inside joke was, “we don’t look at slides.”
Buster’s Club Dada show, while well intentioned, had no follow up to it. Meanwhile, Nada’s Anarchy Open Art Show succeeded in attracting literally hundreds of artists and viewers to the Rivington scene. Fred Bertucci had just opened a storefront at 40 Rivington, as well, and “Freddie and Jimmy,” as they were sometimes called, began a series of art events that re-awoke the vibrancy of the earlier 1983 scene of the legendary 99 nights. The Nada gallery and the Freddie the Dreamer gallery soon held openings on a nearly week-by-week basis.
The concept of Nada grew out of a preoccupation, an obsession, with the imminent prospect of total annihilation. Having come of age in the midst of cold war fear, tangled with the 1960s, the Viet Nam war, widespread urban unrest, the rioting and looting which accompanied the civil rights movement, the decade of assassinations, political and otherwise. John and Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X. The rupture and disjuncture of a society in the throws of chaos permeated my own consciousness and scores of others.
An artist friend named Dan Peterson gave Jim C. a book in 1979 –
The Marines Handbook. Jim C. stared with wonderment and disbelief at a chapter on conducting a nuclear war, that described it as though it was not only inevitable, but also winnable. All of the petty feuding and disagreements between peoples, nationalities, philosophers, races and religions seemed trite and meaningless, to pale in comparison with the deafening wail of sirens, the blinding light of the sun – our nuclear reality. This was the age of Reagan's, “We will begin bombing in five minutes.”
Nada was a place that was no place. A land of scattered souls, lost angels flying upward with the wind. An image from The Marine’s Handbook of the blast at Bikini Island became the symbol for Nada. Etched over the mushroom blast, Jim C. drew radiating symbolic “X” marks, crosses and the dripping text - “Nada” – spattered beneath it. A photograph from Hiroshima also inspired the Nada. The Casa Nada storefront itself was an isolated architectural afterthought, as it partially jutted out in physical space from the building, a left over artifact resulting from the thoughtless demolition of the adjacent building which once stood on the vacant lot that was to become the Rivington sculpture garden. Andy Castrucci’s brother, Paul, was an architect. Andy inscribed on Nada’s wall facing the sculpture garden, “The architects did not care.”
The photograph of Hiroshima after the bomb blast showed one remaining, lone brick building left standing in the midst of the utter devastation. This was “Nada.” The atmosphere with which all of this brutal and edgy nihilism flourished was “tongue in check.” All of these notions of imminent devastation and annihilation, it must be noted, were made while the Nada artists were studiously annihilating their own senses. Insane laughter accompanied the ritual smashing of beer bottles, spreading the litter of our age over a collective mindscape. They became one with a spiraling and disintegrating landscape. Sex, drugs and alcohol were consumed to the deafening drone of a catastrophic noise that they called music.
Nada was informed by Dada. As Hans Richter described the early Dadists in his book
Dada: Art and Anti-Art, “Our provocations, demonstrations and defiances were only a means of arousing the bourgeoisie to rage and through this rage to shame faced self-awareness. Our real motive force was not rowdiness for its own sake, or contradiction and revolt in themselves, but the question (basic then as it is now), ‘where next?’” (Richter, p.9). For, out of Nada, out of nothing, springs all of creation. “Todos y Nada” was their battle cry.
Nada was intent upon disturbing and disrupting a status quo that would result, finally, in an absurd and total annihilation. The Rivington artists gained a reputation, which inspired fear among the mainstream of the art world. They were the punks of the art scene. “Outside of society,” as Patti Smith would describe it in “Rock ‘n Roll Nigger,” where she wails, “Jackson Pollock was a nigger!” A neanderthal, primate, grunge existence was revealed in the murky and dusty detritus of the scene and of the age.
The
Anarchy Art Show flooded the Lower East Side with posters depicting the image of the nuclear explosion with the dripping word Nada above. The invitation was to any and all artists willing to bring their work to la nueva Casa Nada on Rivington Street. Artists ask, “Is there a size limitation?” “No, if you got it, I’ll hang it.” Large paintings are hung over the small ones. As people stream into the gallery, Jim C. removes the large paintings from the walls, revealing the hidden show of smaller paintings. Everything is in an anarchic state of flux. Critics spewed venom. “Overly democratic,” sneered Carlo McCormick in the East Village Eye. The implication was that, without proper curatorial judgment, this experiment, the Anarchy Art Show, would be a show of pure schlock. Yet, the Anarchy Art Show was more about flying in the face of a society that says that art is something only produced and judged by a special, critically sanctioned, elite class of people. The Anarchy Art Show was about elevating the status of the struggling artist more than of declaring that one had discovered and was showing “great art.” Nada quickly became known as the “cutting edge.” Ironically, Carlo’s was one of the few mentions Nada ever got in the art rags of the day (the exception being David Herskowitz’s Paper Magazine). The Anarchy Open Art Show helped to open the floodgates for a resurgence of the Rivington scene.
Jim C.’s video camera captured the moments as they flew by. Time, like the black hole remnant of a supernova, expanded then collapsed. Days stretched into weeks, weeks into years, years into decades. So much happened in such a short amount of time that the decade of the eighties felt like a century.
A vacant lot was adjacent to Nada. A mirror of “nothing,” the lot was strewn with garbage and litter. This lot was home to Geronimo, who lived there during the warmer months of the year. Jim C. and Strande were drifting apart. Jim asked her to do a kind of surrealistic collaboration. She trucked a pile of painted cow bones from Wisconsin to the site of the vacant lot. There he dug at the barren earth, scratching its hard, unrelenting surface. He planted these bones into the earth. The lot became transformed into a weird, unsettling apocalyptic image. This was in the fall of 1984: the first incarnation of Geronimo’s abandoned lot, what was to later become known as “the Rivington sculpture garden.” Soon after, artists such as Strande, the late Geoff Gilmore nicknamed Gizmo(figure 2), the artist group called Babalu (John Waldo and Pat -----), and Andrew Castrucci would paint a set of murals on the walls of the lot, with Babalu creating a sculptural relief of an ear protruding from the bricks on the wall of Nada facing the once empty space, as if the walls actually
did have ears.

geoffgilmore
2. Geoff Gilmore, otherwise known as
“Gizmo” at Nada,
circa 1984 by Jim C.


There is little doubt today, for those who were there, as to how this empty lot first began to be a place where artists worked. Out of the bones of the dead the Rivington Sculpture Garden was born.
Jim C. had fled the East Village for new turf. The East Village had proven to be a place where up and coming, emerging artists and entrepreneurs vied for attention in an atmosphere of heated competition. He had thought that the move to Rivington Street and Nada would free him from the constraints of others trying to exert their power over him. Nothing could be further from the truth. Enter “Cowboy” Ray Kelly. He had first seen Ray earlier, before Nada, at ABC No Rio, an artist’s cooperative at 156 Rivington Street. Jim C. was videotaping the art and performances there when he noticed someone staring, emotionless. Jim C. gave a nod and a smile, but this man gave no reaction at all, but a grim, stolid, steady stare that cut right through you. He did not crack a smile. His unflinching demeanor was unsettling. This was Cowboy Ray. Later, Fred Bertucci would introduce Ray to Jim C. as the owner of No Se No, or “Club Dada,” as Buster had envisioned it. Jim C. could sense what he felt was a simmering resentment from Cowboy. Jim C., a young upstart neophyte was edging in on Cowboy’s territory. Jim C. ignored these feelings, intent upon diving head on into a wild creative process where he would try to rival the Dadaists, in this new and lost place. The Anarchy Art Show and the bone sculpture had brought literally hundreds of people to Nada. Susan had left. Cowboy curtly told Jim C., “She doesn’t like you.” Upon entering No Se No, Jim is greeted by a “Hello, asshole.” It appeared that everyone was referred to as “asshole.” “Just one of those things,” he guessed, “Maybe we are all just assholes. Live with it.” One time, entering No Se No, Ray yelled, “Hey, faggot!” Jim said, “I’m not gay, asshole.” Ray came to Nada to check out the scene. Upon seeing a painting with sculptural clay molded onto it, Cowboy took his thumb and squashed it out, saying, “weak materials.” The artist, Geoff Gilmore, or “Gizmo," had no problem with this. He said, “Yeah, Ray’s right – weak materials.” Ray’s power over others was strong. People tended to bend easily to his will. Jim C. was not one of those people.
The No Se No had ceased to do performance because the city had shut that activity down. Ray and Fred had an idea to open the basement of 40 Rivington to create a new “basement No Se No.” Jim C. was “down with that,” so they all got together to work at clearing the basement. One night Ray videotaped Fred and Jim shoveling piles of garbage from the basement. At six o’clock in the morning they all left to “crash.” Around 10 a.m. Jim C. went outside and discovered the bone sculptures had all been toppled, crushed and destroyed. This was the abrupt end of the first phase of his experience on Rivington Street.
Cowboy Ray had a girlfriend named Rachelle Garniez. Rachelle and Ray had shaved their heads, a noticeable pair. Rachelle was young, around 18 years old, easily 15 years younger than he. She was also quite attractive, with an angular face and bright darting eyes and a smile to match. Jim C. discovered that he had unknowingly videotaped her previously at a club called Danceteria, where he had documented painter David West’s
Sex Questionnaire interviews that were later aired on cable TV’s Midnight Blue. At an art show, the Gorilla Art Show on Avenue B and 10th Street, curated by the late Red Spot (Alan Dougherty) Jim saw Ray and Rachelle, where he was able to document the two on videotape for the first time. The show featured Kwok, a Chinese calligrapher that had been featured at the No Se No Button Show. Kwok would translate anything you want onto a button using Chinese calligraphy. Ray had Kwok write No Se No in Chinese calligraphy.
Like an
angel from space, a lost planetella who was out of orbit, in search of her home planet, Rachelle spun with a wild, creative force, a crazy maelstrom that meshed together with Jim C’s chaotic visions. Rachelle called Nada New Say Nada, combining No Se No with Nada, indicating that something very new was happening on Rivington Street. The Nada was deeply engaged in the anarchy show. For a period of around 10 months, from fall 1984 to fall of 1985, Rachelle played co-director of Nada. Jim C. and Rachelle’s portraits were featured in a show of art dealers at Colin Deland’s Vox Populi gallery on East Sixth Street between Avenue A and Avenue B. The photographer Tom Warren photographed the two for Roland Hagenberg’s East Village Book. Her friend, the painter Geoff Gilmore, better known as “Gizmo,” pleaded with Jim C. for a solo exhibition of his paintings. This ended the Anarchy Open Show and began a period of solo artist installations at Nada. Geoff was the first artist to solo at Nada. Jim C. began an experiment in cross-hybridization, combining Rivington and East Village artists in an ongoing series of installation exhibitions. Jim typed up a schedule of shows, which change on a weekly basis. This list was mailed to the New York Times gallery listings where a woman named Jane English, friendly to the downtown scene, made sure that Nada was included. The Nada Gallery was listed under “other” galleries, even though Rivington Street is only two blocks south of the East Village. Rivington, located “on the Lower East Side.”
It is difficult to recall all of the shows at Nada. Kevin Wendall, otherwise known as Fa-Q, (figure 3), Scot Borofsky, Ena Paul Kostabi, Ena’s brother Mark, Daze (Chris Ellis), David West, Rick Prol, Peggy Cyphers, Edward Brezinski, Brian Goodfellow, James Romberger, Marguerite Van Cook, Michael Roman, the Cracked Mirror Show, curated by Michael Carter, which featured David Wojnarowicz, Richard Hambleton and Joe Coleman, a show protesting police brutality called “Brute Force,” curated by Robert Costa (figure 4), Krzysztof Zarebski, Diane Vierra, the Russian painter Victor Skersis, Conrad Vogel and many others…. But the summer of 1985 included one show that was to revive the damaged bone-sculpture garden.

kevinwendall fa-qrobertcosta
4. Kevin Wendall (Fa-Q) 1985 By Jim C. 5. Robert Costa at Nada circa 1985 by Jim C.



This was the Japanese-American sculptor Ken Hiratsuka’s installation of stone sculpture. Ken had a concept of “one line,” infinitely connecting, unifying the parts into an all engulfing whole. He feverishly, obsessively etched this jagged, sometimes spiraling line on stone fragments, blue stone sidewalks in the East Village and Soho, even tracing this line on the body of his girlfriend, Gloria MacLean, as a performance during his show at Nada, all videotaped by Jim C. This show attracted a large throng of people. A kind of creative potential, a momentum, was gathering at the Nada openings. At Ken’s show that momentum reached critical mass. Hundreds of onlookers watched as Ken “planted the seed.” The “Seed” was the name given to a large boulder that Ken had etched with his one line. It was transplanted from Central Park to a new kind of zone, what has been called a “temporary autonomous zone” (see Michael Carter’s article on Hackeym Bey’s concept of T.A.Z.). The fanfare and excitement of Ken’s installation heralded a furry of activity that culminated in the Rivington Street metal sculpture garden (which is detailed in other chapters in this book). Toyo, at one point, painted the sculpture white, but Jim C. used the white paint as a gesso over which he began, in a fit of alchemy, spray-painting the sculpture gold. Shit turned to gold.
Colin Deland had asked Jim C. to document the sculptor Robert Parker hacking up an old checker cab with a circular saw. The cab had been abandoned in a vacant lot on the north side of East 12th Street between Avenue B and C. The components hewn from the rusty old cab were reformed into cube structures for a show at Colin’s gallery. Parker’s checker cab installation at Vox Populi was later sold to a nightclub called The World, located on East 2nd Street near Avenue C. Cowboy and Parker hauled the rest of that cab down to the lot adjacent to Nada Gallery. This was the beginning of the metal sculpture that was to envelope the entire lot, the Rivington Sculpture garden.
Jim C. had been working as a “VJ” at a nightclub called Danceteria that was located on 21st street between 6th and 7th Avenues. Vjing is a form of video art where the artist projects mixes of video live to an audience. Combined with sound, this becomes audiovisual art. Jim had been showing his video and audio abstractions around the downtown scene. At Nada, No Se No, ABC NO RIO, Darinka, Limbo. Carlo invited him to show at 8BC (East 8th Street between B and C and the Chandelier on Avenue C and East 7th Street). But, even while the scene appeared to be catapulting and frenzied, an article appeared in Leonard Abrams’ East Village Eye that effectively took the wind out of the sails of the East Village movement. This was apiece written by Carlo McCormick entitled East Village R.I.P. Although the Rivington scene was separate geographically and aesthetically to the East Village scene, Rivington’s identity lay in its opposition to the East Village.

To Be Continued...