The readiness to deconstruct is all

A.D.
Nuttall,
Shakespeare the
Thinker, Yale University Press. 428
pp.
Colin
McGinn,
Shakespeare's
Philosophy, HarperCollins. 230
pp.
Review by
Carlin
Romano
To be or not to be a
philosopher did not concern Shakespeare, so far as we know. And we know very
little.
Indeed, it might be said that the
endless interpretations of scholars who claim Shakespeare meant this or that, or
wrote from a familiar ideological position - "closet Catholic" keeps rising as a
trendy view in recent bios - die many times before their deaths (savaged by
rival scholars), while modest approaches taste of deconstruction but once, when
the books in which they appear get
pulped.
And there's the nub - the paradox
of Shakespeare scholarship that continues nearly 400 years after his
death.
On the one hand - a phrase
Shakespeare may have invented, along with a higher percentage of English truisms
than anyone else - the Bard endures as the supreme writer in the history of the
English language and, to many, the most profound ever across all
cultures.
When we refuse to "budge an
inch," excoriate "rotten apples," or admonish slackers to "sink or swim," we
speak in his voice. Although the arts sections of newspapers teem with products
from self-anointed "artists" who will not survive their publicity budgets,
Shakespeare after roughly four centuries still pleases general audiences,
challenges intellectuals, and provokes academics. How can we not presume that
such a stupendous orchestrator of character and insight operated with a
coherent, multifaceted theory of human
nature?
On the other hand, our ignorance
of Shakespeare the man - he left no diaries or letters in his short life of some
52 years - and the clashing multiple versions of some of his texts, have always
dovetailed with a contrary belief that his greatness arises precisely from utter
openness to the varieties of human behavior, emotion and thought, his ability to
render in concrete scenes and daring metaphors more non-reductionist nuances of
the heart and mind than an army of writers centuries later.
Full review at philly.com >>>
Posted: Fri - May 25, 2007 at 08:38 AM