A quick career
biography:
I graduated from Sussex University in 1981 with a degree in
Experimental Psychology. I went to Edinburgh where I did a PhD in
Artificial Intelligence. I spent four years ('84-'88) working as a
postdoctoral researcher on a project with about 15 other people
trying to build a computer that would be able to recognize normal
speech. It didn't. I left in 1988 to rejoin the Laboratory of
Experimental Psychology at Sussex (now the
Department of
Psychology), this time as a lecturer, and came to
York in
1996.
What I work on
I work on the psychology of language, a topic that I've been
interested in since my last year as an undergraduate. After
graduating, I became interested in how we deal with ambiguity, and
why the following perfectly grammatical sentences are
problematic
1. The psychology lecturer told the girl that she should have
listened to to repeat the question.
2. He'll reply to the letter he received tomorrow.
After spending far too much time researching this kind of thing, I
shifted topic (ever so slightly) and started working on how we
establish, as we read or hear a sentence, 'who did what to whom' -
that is, how we figure out the relationships between the different
things mentioned in the sentence. In fact, that's not so different
from what I was doing before, it's just that now I didn't have to
study ambiguity, but could study unambiguous sentences also. If
you're interested, you can read a quick summary of all this work by
selecting the research menu item on the right. The summary is very
brief, and probably not entirely self-explanatory. As soon as I've
got the time, I'll improve it. Paradoxically perhaps, I now study
language by monitoring eye movements... (and you can read about
this also in the research section). This is what I've been doing
for the past 10 years or so (interspersed with moments of sanity
when I study other things). I quickly became interested in how
language can direct attention around the external world, and then
became interested in how our perception of the external world might
influence our interpretation of sentences that refer to that world.
So just to give a flavour* of this otherwise uninterpretable
description of what I do: it turns out that if you hear 'the boy
will eat the cake', and simultaneously see a number of things,
including a cake, you'll look at the cake during 'eat'. In fact, if
you had previously seen the cake, but it's gone by the time you
hear the sentence, you'd look during 'eat' to where the cake
had been.
I also work on the acquisition of grammatical information, the use
of neural networks to model that acquisition process, and the ways
in which adult language processing is just a consequence of the
ways in which we first learn about language as young infants.
To find out more...
To find out more about my research, teaching, current
preoccupations (children, Oxford University Press marketing
division, Coffee, etc. etc.), use the menu on the right.
*for our US cousins: flavour =
flavor.