These days, Americans suspected of no
wrongdoing can suddenly find themselves caught up in FBI surveillance
operations.
It's as easy as
saying "national security letter."
Using this little-noticed but potent
tool, the FBI can demand, for example, that an Internet provider, bank or phone
company turn over records of who you call and e-mail, which websites you visit,
how much you spend, where you work, fly and vacation, and much more. No judge
has to approve the demand, a common check required on more typical
subpoenas.
You'd never learn
about the secret intrusion, either. It's all
classified.
The public got a
rare and troubling glimpse behind this curtain when The Washington Post reported
Sunday that the FBI now issues thousands of National Security Letters a year.
Each can seek many records on many
people.
According to The Post
and government documents, the Bush administration has quietly rewritten Justice
Department rules so it can keep records indefinitely, even when they prove
irrelevant to an investigation. The government can also share the records
broadly, enabling the FBI to build what amounts to electronic dossiers on untold
numbers of Americans.
The
report added to a growing bipartisan backlash against several intrusive tools in
the USA Patriot Act, which was rushed into law shortly after 9/11 to help combat
terrorism. Because the process is largely hidden from the public, Congress and
the judiciary, there is no broad assessment of how the tools are applied. But
the few cases that have struggled into the light suggest extensive, secret
intrusion into the lives of law-abiding
people:
• Last summer,
the FBI demanded records of everybody who used a specific computer at a
Connecticut library. The FBI's letter, delivered by agents, warned the recipient
not to disclose the demand "to any person" - seeming to cut him off even from a
lawyer. Instead of complying, the Library Connection Inc., which provides
computer services, filed suit, seeking to at least protest the FBI demand in
public. Months later, the case is in a federal appeals court. Most of it remains
sealed, and everyone involved is
gagged.
• In December
2003, after intelligence reports hinted at a New Year's Eve attack in Las Vegas,
the government launched a digital manhunt there using several tools, including
National Security Letters. Investigators sought to capture the names of every
tourist in Las Vegas and everyone who rented a car or truck or flew into the
airport over several days. Today, long after the hunt proved fruitless, the
record of each visitor's hotel stay is in government data banks, The Post
reported.
• Last year,
after an Internet provider challenged an FBI request for records, a federal
judge in New York ruled that the letter violated the Constitution by giving the
FBI unchecked powers to get private information. The claim of perpetual secrecy,
the judge wrote, has "no place in our open society." The case is on
appeal.
No one argues with the
need for far-reaching investigative tools to disrupt a terrorist plot. But such
tools can become political weapons without scrutiny from judges and the public.
Both are absent here.
The
National Security Letters don't tell people they can challenge the demands in
court. In fact, they direct people to tell no one that the FBI has sought the
records. The Justice Department won't even reveal the number of letters it has
issued, though it says the volume is substantially less than the 30,000 a year
cited in The Post report.
Law
enforcement's history of abusing some of its broad powers calls for caution. In
the past, the FBI has used the Cold War or protests as excuses to spy on
pacifist and civil rights groups. Today's war on terror can easily spawn new
abuses.
Parts of the Patriot
Act are up for renewal this fall. Congress has an opportunity - and certainly
good reason - to place new limits on the FBI's powers. The war on terror doesn't
have to become a war on the privacy and free speech of ordinary
Americans.