Retrospect is it useable?
Since moving from OS 9 to OS X Retrospect has
been having problems. Where you could with OS 9 erase and restore an entire hard
disk and have it running and recognising it's System folder with no worries at
all, with the OS X version I wouldn't attempt it as I can't even get it to
restore a simple application let alone the system
folder.With the latest update for OS X
10.4.1 Retrospect seems to be having a problem with Spotlight files which for
some reason when Retrospect tries to back them up it crashes Retrospect. It is
possible to filter these files out see Retrospect KB but even so it still isn't doing
"what it says on the box" which is being a dependable backup system. Retrospect Tiger Compatibility Read Me
One alternative is what is described
by iGary posted on the Dantz Retrospect List read on....
Subject: Re: Media failures in Retrospect (OK in
Finder, Toast, etc.)
Poster :
iGary
Date : 05/26/05 12:37
PM
I am a long long time user of
Retrospect and have suggested it to many people. It works great for backup tape
and hard drive media.
I have tried for
years with the OS X version to get consistent stability when backing up to
optical media. Nothing byt media errors galore. I have tried on about 10 Macs
with different versions of OS X, different versions of Retrospect, different
brands of media, and different optical drives. These systems are able to burn
optical media day in and day out with Toast, Disc Burner, Dragon Burn etc.
Retrospect is unique in its inability to get consistent reliable optical media
burns.
Version 6 cannot read some
version 5 catalogs. Version 5 cannot read some version 4
catalogs...
Retrospect and Dantz are an
embarrassment and I have stopped recommending
it.
In fact, for one client I am
unarchiving whatever can be unarchived, reburning with Toast and cataloging with
iView Media Pro. Much of the data is lost because Retrospect simply cannot burn
optical disks.
Advantages to not using
Retrospect for archiving to optical media:
1.
It works.
2. The data can be burned on hybrid
discs that can be read on any Mac or PC, instead of being stored in a
proprietary file readable (if you're lucky) only by Retrospect. Archiving data
in a proprietary file is insane.
3. Speed.
Retrospect can at best burn a DVD at 4x (usually 2x) using 8x or 16x burners and
8x or 16 x media.
4. Catalog
sharing.
Posted: Fri - May 27, 2005 at 09:44 AM