I've made the call...for now
It's General Wesley Clark
Yesterday I put my money where my mouth is and
donated money to Clark's campaign. I plan to take a further step and try to
volunteer to do more.As most of you
may know, I've been trying to figure out which way to go for some time. I had
narrowed it down to four: Clark, Kerry, Gephardt or Edwards. You'll notice Dean
isn't on that list.I am convinced that
we will lose if we nominate Dean. It's NOT just that I think he'll be labeled as
too liberal. I don't think he has a single area where he can claim to outshine
Bush, save perhaps Internet
savvy.Don't get me wrong, I'm sure he
does outshine Bush in every conceivable way, but being objective, I don't think
the message will play.They were both
Governors, but Bush was Governor of a huge state, Dean a tiny one, so the
analogy of Governor to President may be true, but Texas is more like an entire
country than Vermont.They both got out
of any real military duty. Bush went AWOl from the national guard, but Dean got
a deferment based on a back injury, and then spent 10 months skiing in Aspen.
So neither one of them is going to bring that topic
up.I know Dean will play on being a
Washington outsider, but let's not forget Bush somehow managed to pull of that
same claim a scant 4 years ago, so I doubt he'll be hurt by it much this
year.And this doesn't even address his
liberal image, his angry image or his stiff, wooden image.
So where is Dean going to put his
eggs? I wish he even had the one
basket.And I know some people I
respect are all into Kerry, but I don't think he, Gephardt or Edwards really
stand a chance either. Kerry probably has the best shot in a mano y mano against
Bush...because he can bring up his own highly laudable military past and long
record of public service. But let's face it, if he can't catch fire with
Democrats, how is he going to with the entire
nation?So why does Clark have a
chance? I think there are a few
reasons:1. His military
backgroundWhile odd for a Democrat, is a
strength in a National race, and I think most Democrats across the left to right
spectrum are thinking about that National race above all else. Also with an
entire career in the military, Bush will be hard-pressed to criticize Clark's
"record" whatever it may be. Bush's lack of military credibility will make that
very shaky ground to walk on indeed.2.
His Republican background Clark can talk
about why he switched and appeal to those Republicans who actually share most
values on the social side with Democrats, but have fooled themselves that the
Republicans will improve the size of their wallet. I think Clark can appeal to
the very best in people by openly talking about why he
switched.3. His political
"outside-ness" The military may be its own
special universe, full of its own brand of politics. So is just about every
company you'll ever work for. People don't consider career military folks to be
political in the same way they do politicians, however, and in these cynical
times, that can be a big plus.4. He
has powerful friends who still have some cache in the US...namely the Clintons.
Yes, Dean may have Gore, and frankly I think the Clintons are doing the right
thing to avoid endorsing anyone before a single primary vote has been cast. But
eventually I believe they will start stumping for Clark, and I think that will
help. Clinton actually left office with a positive approval rating. Hilary has
managed to improve her reputation immensely, and while she may be a polarizing
force, she is someone a huge number of people admire and listen to. That is
going to help Clark. Maybe not today, but in a national
race...definitely.5. In this day and
age a LACK of voting record seems to be a big advantage. From Bush to Dean to
Edwards etc. etc. etc., from the media, to the Internet, to talk radio
hosts...for every politician there is a record that is being examined in detail,
that is being scoured for every inconsistency, and there is time being suck away
from talking about issues to talking about justifying each and every vote. Well,
I highly doubt that people will be interested or even able to dissect Clark's
military record in the same way.But
all of those 5 reasons are more about why I think he could win, not why I would
WANT him to win. And it should definitely be in my nature to be suspicious of
his party switch, of his
military-ness.Sometimes you go with
your gut feel about a person. And I somehow don't
like
Dean. I find him cranky and wooden.But
I like
this guy Clark. Oddly, I think he seems kind. I think he seems positive. He
seems like a straight shooter, and like a true patriot, not a puffed up,
revolting sham of one like Bush. He also expresses himself well, whether he's
projecting his hopeful vision, or slamming a Fox News Channel
anchor.He's clearly very, very
intelligent, and I admire that. I
want a
president that is smarter than me. I won't sacrifice smarts, just so that I can
"relate" to someone, and I have never understood why other people are so willing
to.Oh, and by the way...he was a
hottie when he was young :)If you want
to see his youthful hotness, or, okay, if you want to see other, more germane
things about him, you can view his promo video at the link
below:American Son; The Wesley Clark "Promotional
Video"
Posted: Monday - January 12, 2004 at 04:37 PM EmailFeedback
|
Quick Links
Annotated Blog Roll
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Sep 03, 2011 07:10 PM
|