On Tuesday night November 4th I went to bed
feeling pretty ecstatic that America voted for hope and change, not hate and
fear. But I also went to bed unsure of how the California propositions were
going to come out. I was in NYC and had to get up early for a conference, so
couldn't stay up to watch the returns. I felt emotionally invested in and
therefore incredibly nervous and full of dread about three propositions:
-Prop 2 re: mandating some small
improvements to the brief and tortured lives of some (and only some) factory
farmed animals
-Prop 4 re: sneakily
trying for the third time in nearly just that many years to chip away at a
woman's right to choose by pretending it was about protecting teens form
pedophiles
-Prop 8 re: incomprehensibly
writing discrimination into our state constitution, all to prevent two people
who love each other from getting the equal rights and responsibilities that come
from the civil contract of
marriage
When I awoke i found out that
I could breathe a sigh of relief about the first two, but that Prop 8 was
winning, that discrimination was winning, that disenfranchisement and unfairness
was winning, that bigotry was
winning.
And I must confess it has
completely dampened my excitement over this election and the election of Barack
Obama. I know other states voted in gay marriage bans; I know Arkansas actually
voted to prevent unmarried couples from adopting or being foster parents
(because being a ward of the state is sooo much better) but I expected more from
my own state. I expected this blue state to be progressive across the board. I
was deeply deeply disappointed...and it continues to be disappointing, and to
mute my joy about how the election otherwise
went.
One of the most painful parts was
to see the media and some of my own gay friends state that "Californians care
more about chickens than humans", because Prop 2 passed so easily, while the
campaign against Prop 8 failed.
Just as
in the primary season, when discussions of sexism vs. racism tended to not be
productive, I also don't see what Prop 2 and Prop 8 have to do with one another.
And why is no one saying that "Californians care more about mass transit than
humans" although Prop 1 also passed. Or that they care more about veterans or
children or any number of other groups that saw Propositions pass in their
favor. I know most of my friends did vote Yes on 2 and no on 8, and I know they
know it wasn't those tortured creatures that let them down: It was people.
People we must work hard to move towards demonstrating humane behavior towards
animals and humans both.
But what are
the lessons to be learned? Why did the vote go that way...why indeed did more
people vote to slightly improve the living conditions of some factory farmed
food animals than to allow gay couples to officially
wed?
I think there is one big reason:
The Prop 2 supporters showed us who was being hurt and made sure we knew we
had the power to stop it, while the Prop 8 opponents danced around it and gave
us no opportunity to feel empathy and to be galvanized to action on behalf of
people we didn't even know.
Now,
one of my issues with the Prop 2 campaign was that it actually won't do much for
most animals. It actually gave we the voters a false impression of how much we
were really stopping. They showed us those infamous clips of downed cows being
forklifted, for example, without bothering to say that Prop 2 wouldn't help
those cows at all. A bit disingenuous, but
effective.
Prop 2's proponents showed
us who we could help by passing that Proposition, and motivated us to do so. And
they showed us pain to get outraged
about.
Meanwhile the ads opposing
Proposition 8 were sterile, reactive, and tried to guilt people into voting
against it, instead of inspiring people to do so. Where were the shots of people
that look just like you and me...all races, all shapes and sizes...who are gay
and who would be directly hurt and affected by this Proposition? Show us some
happy families. Hell, show us some beautiful wedding shots of joyful, clearly in
love couples. I've had people tell me NO, showing wedding shots would be going
too far, but I just don't think I agree. Talk about marriage as something that
comes with rights that fairness dictates all couples should have, sure, but also
talk about it as a rite, as a meaningful ceremony. Show us that everyone takes
it that seriously and feels that deeply about
it.
That's my theory...and I'm curious
what you all
think.
Abusing animals is
always wrong, just as discriminating against humans is always wrong. Why should
one oppressed group express their anger by targeting another oppressed group? (I
don´t believe there are any beings on this planet more oppressed
than farmed animals, who are bred, raised, confined, mutilated and slaughtered
at a rate of 55 billion per year
worldwide.)
We might also consider
the direct connection between the oppression of human beings and the oppression
of non-human animals, whether it´s how the domestication of animals
heralded the human slave
trade, or the relationship between the exploitation of animals and the
exploitation of
women.
My favorite
part? Simply his repeated question: "What is it to
you?"
Because seriously, it is very
very hard to understand, especially when it's utter BS to say that marriage has
always been between a man and a woman...I mean polygamy is as biblical as it
gets!
I don't have a grand conclusion
for this post. I don't know what to do next or where it will go. I don't think
we win rights for gay marriage by attacking African-Americans or by pretending
(as the ad campaign tried to) that this isn't about our feelings about marriage.
It is about those feelings...and how strongly everyone in our
society yearns to have that opportunity and that
right.
I hope it somehow gets
overturned, but more than that I hope people learn to respect and appreciate
love, and not stand in its way.
In time
this will happen...the younger generations in this country will see to it. Why
wait when so much is at stake for so many?
Posted: Sun - November 16, 2008 at 08:45 PM EmailFeedback