Moon Parallax Project
by Jeff Adkins, Rob Sparks, Chris Moore, Chris
Guarini, and Kelli Hover Note: This version is substantially revised from the original
document posted here.
Abstract:
Using simultaneous photography, the parallax of the moon was determined
through digital image analysis. Using the parallax angle the distance
to the moon was computed to be 236,000 miles from the observers,
which is very nearly the correct value.
Procedure:
Based on a prediction made by Kelli Hover using Starry Night,
we planned to observe the moon and Jupiter simultaneously when
they would be relatively near each other. On the evening of Wednesday,
May 26, we photographed the moon simultaneously from Antioch, California
and Racine, Wisconsin. Jeff Adkins took the Antioch picture, while
Rob Sparks of Racine, Wisconsin took the other picture. Many thanks
to Rob for assisting us with short notice.
The photos were taken precisely at 8:30 Pacific, 10:30 Central
time. Time was established using "atomic clocks" synchronized
with the official time signal from WWV.
The moon was near the planet Jupiter. In order to establish the
plate scale of the photos, we also photographed a nearby object
of known size and distance using the exact same zoom setting. This
can be used to determine the number of pixels per degree in each
photo. The scales are not identical.
Due to the different observer locations, the moon appeared to
be in two different positions. The position shift is called the
parallax. The amount of shift measured as an angle is called the
parallax angle. |
 |
These pictures show the approximate effect. The scale of the pictures
has been adjusted to be approximately the same. You can clearly see
that distance between the moon and Jupiter is larger for Racine (bottom)
than it was for Antioch (top) even though the pictures were taken
simultaneously. This picture's scale is not precisely to the correct
scale and should not
be used for measurement. The original pictures should be used for
that. (See further down the page) |
Data and Calculations
Presented below are the original photos from
Racine. The first shows the moon and Jupiter together. The second
shows a
12
inch ruler
exactly
2 meters from
the camera, using the same exact zoom setting. |


The images are presented full size because the scaling
requires the original scale, although the images have been compressed
by the
JPEG conversion. (We have the originals if you would like to see
them.)
Using the photo of the ruler, we determined the plate scale of
the camera Rob Sparks used. At a distance of 2 meters, a 12 inch
ruler subtends an angle of 8.66520 degrees (determined using tangent
equation). Using NIH Image, we measured the number of pixels for
the length of the ruler, which turned out to be 1051 pixels, establishing
a plate scale for the camera of 121 pixels per degree.
Then, the picture of the moon and Jupiter was measured using the
same software, and the center-to-center distance was determined
to be 833 pixels, corresponding to 6.867 degrees of separation.
|
The second image is a 3.50 inch circular disc exactly
15.0 inches from the camera, taken with exactly the same zoom.
At this distance the disc subtended an angle of 13.13407 degrees.
Image software used by Chris Guarini and Chris Moore determined
the diameter of the disc to be 370 pixels, yielding a plate scale
of 28.1711 pixels per degree.
|
|
| The next images are from Antioch. This is a screen capture from
an analog video camera, unlike the digital image captured in Racine.
The image quality isn't nearly as good, but it should be "good
enough." The
first shows the moon and Jupiter. Jupiter is circled because the
image
is grainy.
The center to center distance of the moon and Jupiter was determined
to be 184 pixels which corresponds to an angle of 6.531 degrees.
This is significantly different than the separation angle of the
two objects as seen in Racine. |
|
| This diagram shows why the parallax angle is the difference between
the two observed angles. Using the values above, the parallax
angle between the two is the difference between these angles or 0.33685
degrees. |
 |
A complicating factor is that the line of sight from
Racine and Antioch to Jupiter is not perpendicular to the line
connecting the cities, because the earth is round. It is possible
to calculate the distance between the cities by projecting the
line between them onto a plane perpendicular to the line of sight,
but to keep the technique approachable for high school students
we used a method based on the approach used by a different group
that
did
this same
project
in Europe (Backhaus, 2001).
The problem we need to solve is that the baseline between the
observing stations is not c, because that is tilted with respect
to the line
of sight as shown in this diagram. The baseline distance is,
rather, "b". Calculating b is tricky, but can be done simply by
allowing
a computer projection to assist us. |

|
|
Using the earth-moon simulator (Walker, 2004) we created an image
of the earth as seen from the moon at the same time the
photos were taken from the earth. Then using image analysis techniques
on the artificial image, we were able to determine the apparent separation
of the observing stations as seen from the moon's perspective, which
yields b in the diagram above. The picture shown is a greatly reduced
quality image. The red line represents the diameter of the earth
and the teale colored line is the distance between Racine and Antioch
("b").
Plugging in the values to the right we determined the baseline
b is 2234 kilometers or 1388 miles. This makes sense because the
surface
distance
between Racine and Antioch is 1811 miles (Kindred, 2004) and our
projected distance should be smaller. |

Using this image to determine b, we set up a simple proportion
using the following numbers and formula:
b/pixels of teale line = diameter of earth/pixels of red line
teale line = 179 pixels
red line = 1022 pixels
diameter of earth = 2 x 6378 kilometers
|
Now we have all the pieces necessary to determine the distance
to the moon.
Given the baseline b = 1388 miles, and the parallax angle 0.33685
degrees, the tangent equation can be used to determine the distance
using
tangent (parallax) = b/d
or
d = b /tangent (parallax)
yielding d = 236,000 miles.
The accepted value is 239,000 miles. Since we are measuring the
distance to the observers, there is an additional distance which
must be added in to reach the center of the earth. Figuring out
the correction is left as an exercise for the reader (and next
year's students!)
Extensions
This paper will be presented at the National Convention of the
American Association of Physics Teachers in Sacramento in August
2004. At this meeting, we will invite participants to join a mailing
list which will be used by a student in the next year to recreate
the experiment on a larger scale with more students. You can request
to be put on the mailing list by sending email to astronomyteacher
"at" mac.com. |
References (posted June 2004)
Backhaus, Dr. Udo. (2000) "Internet Project: Simultaneously
Photographing the Moon and Determining its Distance." <<http://didaktik.physik.uni-essen.de/~backhaus/moonproject.htm>> Kindred, David. (1998, public domain perl script).
<<http://www.indo.com/distance/>> Based on the `geod' program,
which is part of the `PROJ' system
available from the U.S. Geological Survey at ftp://kai.er.usgs.gov/pub/.
Lawrence, Pete. (2003) "Lunar Parallax Demonstration
Project." <<http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.lawrence1/lunar_parallax.html>> Walker, John. (2004, web based simulator) Earth
and Moon Viewer. <<http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/vplanet.html>>
The Mars Global Surveyor photo analysis was performed
on a Macintosh computer using the public domain NIH Image program
(developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and available
on the Internet at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/). |
|