Quick Links
Calendar
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
|
Categories
Archives
XML/RSS Feed
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Jan 01, 2007 07:47 AM
|
Ecclesiastes 6 "Mid-Libre Crisis"
Questions:
Is it good to have it all? Even if we don't enjoy it? Can we ever know what is
good for us? What efforts -- if any -- will be rewarded? Will what comes after
show us to be wise, or fools?"Read
More" to pursue answers from Ecclesiastes.
Lord, make me a Fountain
of your Love.Draw me into
your holy Presence, that I might know you as my
FatherAnd manifest the image
of Christ in this world, and the world to come.
Amen.Ecclesiastes 6:1-12There
is an evil which I have seen under the sun, and it [is] common among
menAfter a brief interlude of
constructive advice, the author apparently gives
in to his recurring theme of how much life
sucks:A man to whom God
hath given riches, wealth, and honour, so that he wanteth nothing for his soul
of all that he desireth, yet God giveth him not power to eat thereof, but a
stranger eateth it: this [is] vanity, and it [is] an evil
disease.Ouch. Yeah, that would be
a total waste. As would
this:If a man beget an
hundred [children], and live many years, so that the days of his years be many,
and his soul be not filled with good, and also [that] he have no burial; I say,
[that] an untimely birth [is] better than he. For he cometh in with vanity, and
departeth in darkness, and his name shall be covered with darkness. Moreover he
hath not seen the sun, nor known [any thing]: this hath more rest than the
other. Yea, though he live a thousand years twice [told], yet hath he seen no
good: do not all go to one
place?Hang on. This may not so
much be whining against God as an artful deconstruction of human folly. It sure
sounds like he's dissecting the traditional causes of human
striving:
• riches
• wealth
• honour
• children
•
longevity
He doesn't appear to be
against them, but he's pointing out that
having
them is not the same as
enjoying
them.
What I am unclear on is whether
he thinks:
a. It is a gift of God to be able to enjoy
them
b. These never satisfy, so it is foolish on our
part to pursue them
c. God is cruel to fill us with all these futile
desiresOr perhaps (d) -- all of the
above! Though, the next verse seems to lean towards
(b):All the labour of man
[is] for his mouth, and yet the appetite is not
filled.Or perhaps (c), since at
this point it isn't even clear that wisdom will
help:For what hath the
wise more than the fool? what hath the poor, that knoweth to walk before the
living?And desiring what we don't
have seems the surest road to
misery:Better [is] the
sight of the eyes than the wandering of the desire: this [is] also vanity and
vexation of spirit.In fact, he
seems to be arguing we're better off accepting that things will never get
better. We've already got everything we can get, since we aren't strong enough
to take from those who have
more:That which hath been
is named already, and it is known that it [is] man: neither may he contend with
him that is mightier than he.
For that matter, would it really help if we
got it?Seeing there be
many things that increase vanity, what [is] man the
better?Do we even know what is
good for us, either in this life or what comes
after?For who knoweth what
[is] good for man in [this] life, all the days of his vain life which he
spendeth as a shadow? for who can tell a man what shall be after him under the
sun?Well, maybe. Things look
pretty bleak here at the halfway point of Ecclesiastes, but the story isn't
finished
yet...PrayerGod,
as we begin this new year, I pray that you would help me question the cliches
and habits I rely upon. Save me from treading the path of fools in the pursuit
of that which never satisfies. Let me face 2007 with eyes wide open to both the
folly of humanity, and your neverending grace and love. Through Jesus Christ
our Lord, Amen.About the
Title:Today's title is a play on
the phrase midlife crisis.
Posted: Mon - January 1, 2007 at 07:47 AM
|