Best Buddhist Writing 2004 coverKENSHO SCHMENSHO!

 

So I'm in a book store the other day and I see this book called The Best Buddhist Writing of 2004 and I wondered what these guys might think is the best Buddhist writing of 2004. So I pick up the book, and what do you know -- I'm in it! Gosh.

 

My publishers had mentioned something about this to me ages ago. But this is the first I'd actually seen of the book. It's a purty little book and it's a great honor to be included. I'm very happy they chose my work.

 

There's just one little thing. The last little bit of their introduction to my stuff really stuck in my craw. And I thought I needed to clear things up a bit here. Now I know that to a lot of you this will just come off as nitpicking. But it's actually really important to me, so let me get it off my chest. OK?

 

After saying lots of nice stuff about my book (thank you), the editor then goes on to say that the chapter is about how I was suddenly struck by what he calls a "kensho experience." "A sudden hit of the enlightened mind" is how he describes it, I think (nobody ever sent me a copy so I'm doing this from memory). For those of you not up on your hipster Buddhist-speak I should explain that kensho  — which is Japanese for seeing into one's nature — is a euphemism for what they used to call Enlightenment. You know, that one moment where you supposedly get the big download from on high and everything is right and beautiful forever and ever amen.

 

The chapter they chose is the one in which I was walking along the street one morning and happened to just kinda notice what the whole Buddhist philosophical system was all about. I can't blame the editor of the Best Buddhist Writing book for thinking this was a description of a "kensho" experience. Quite a number of readers have made the same mistake. The blame is entirely mine for not writing more clearly. If I had do-overs on my life I'd probably replace that chapter with something more useful, like a critical study of Voyage to the Planet of Prehistoric Women.

 

Just for the record then, the chapter is not about a kensho experience. I have never had a kensho experience. I hope I never do. I've never come across anyone who claimed to have had one of those who could convince me it was anything worth experiencing.

 

The expression I used in that chapter to describe what happened that day is one learned from my teacher. He never talks about kensho. In fact, when asked about kensho, he'd likely quote you Dogen's famous phrase, "Kensho is the animated activity of non-Buddhists." He does sometimes talk about the experience of "solving philosophical problems." He calls it this because that's all it is. If you practice zazen long enough there may come a time when you see through most of the philosophical problems you've held for most of your life. It's nice if that happens. But it is not the goal of Buddhist practice. At best itÕs a little perk you might get on the side. And if it doesn't happen, it's no big deal. Consider yourself lucky!

 

You cannot induce such an experience. Never. Never. Never. Drugs won't do it. Mantras won't do it. Meditation won't do it. So-called "koan introspection" definitely won't do it. Such methods are just ways of adding confusion on top of confusion.

 

See, the only thing you understand when you solve your philosophical problems is that this is just this. That life is what it is, that you are what you are, that the universe is what it is. Get me? You can't even explain what the universe is. It just is what it is. That's it. Anyone who claims there's anything beyond that is a lying sack of excrement.

 

It's not that people who reach this understanding are special in any way. In fact, since it's only the understanding that things are exactly what they are, the real wonder is not that some rare few get it. The real wonder is how so many people can possibly miss something so exceedingly obvious.

 

The main reason we miss it, though, might be that we're just too damned clever for our own good. Maybe "clever" isn't the best word. Perhaps "intellectual" is closer to the mark. See, the problem is that we believe our own thoughts. We believe the picture of reality we've created inside our own heads more than we believe reality itself. Or worse, we believe in our own "kensho experiences" and in those of others.

 

In order to have any understanding at all of the true situation we need to turn away from that elaborate creation and start paying attention to what's really here.

 

You can never will the truth to appear because the very act is based on a complete misunderstanding of the truth. You cannot hurry the process along in any way. There are no "expedient means" to use another favorite bit of Buddhist-speak.

 

All you can do is to sit down, shut up and let reality present itself. There are no other ways, I'm afraid. I know a lot of people don't like to hear me say such things. And if you don't like to hear it, go listen to someone else. You'll find plenty of folks out there who'll happily play up to whatever fantasies you've got.

 

But if you're willing to face up to what's real, there is no reason why you cannot reach the deepest understanding. It may take a long time before you're ready to look. And the process itself will always, always, always entail a certain degree of pain. Pain — mental as well as physical — is born of your unwillingness to see things as they are. But even your unwillingness to see reality for what it is, is part of reality as it is. So even your delusion itself is "Enlightenment" if there is such a thing.

 

But it sure ain't kensho!

 

BACK TO TOP PAGE