Gig Blog: Shooting a wedding service...in widescreen!
This is the post-gig analysis on a 3 camera shoot
of a wedding service that we filmed recently. What did we learn? Mainly...that
we still have stuff to learn! but also widescreen is great, but needs some
thinking through.
Read more for the
details...
I guess you could argue whether shooting a
wedding video for a friend counts as a VLOBLIVE gig or not, but in this case,
since the shoot was a three camera shoot, with only two crew, it certainly
counts in my book.I am aware that wedding
videos is a whole other subculture within the video eco-system, and there are
better places to discuss them, but since a lot
of the points raised are relevant to VLOBLIVE gigs, it seems sensible to discuss
them here.What
was the gig?A 'normal'
wedding service in a nice old, but non-traditional church building. Big wide
platform at front, wide sweeping U shaped balcony above, pews,
etc.Music was contemporary with a
band/piano, and the 'action' took place up on the platform at the
front.Light was fantastic, thanks to big
roof windows and plenty of floodlights on the very high
roof.Brief from the 'commissioners'
was 'film the wedding'. No particular expectations or
requests.What
equipment was used?We shot
with three cameras:
• Sony HDR-HC1 HDV widescreen camcorder
recording HDV to tape and via firewire to Serious
Magic DV Rack (trial copy). This camera was placed at the front
corner of the balcony to get side shots of the couple and the minister and shots
of the congregation.
• JVC KY-27D Studio camera recording to
miniDV on Sony GD-V900 walkman. OK this was a bit overkill, but it is a good
camera and we didn't have access to another miniDV camcorder. I recorded 4:3 to
the Sony walkman, but taped up the big viewfinder on the JVC to let me frame for
16:9
• Panasonic NV-GD250 3-CCD miniDV camcorder
recording to miniDV in 16:9 mode. This was borrowed from a friend who had only
had it for a week, so we had to be extra careful.
• Sony minidisk recorder connected to PA
mixing desk to record audio of service. This was to backup the audio recorded by
the cameras.
•
What were the
challenges?
• It was our first 16:9 shoot - this was
the first time that we had filmed in widescreen 16:9 at a live event, so we were
aware that framing might be different from what we were used to, Also we weren't
sure how well it would suit the camera positions we ended up
using.
• New gear - both the Sony HDR-HC1
(replacement for our trusty, but now dead TRV890) and the Panasonic NV-GD250
(borrowed from a friend) were new to us, and had not been used by use at a real
VLOBLIVE gig before. This was a worry, since it takes a while usually to work
out the pros and cons of a new camera - what shots it will cope with and which
it won't?
• Staying out of the way - we fully respect
the need to be incredibly unobtrusive at weddings. It's not really all about the
wedding video, after all. But we still need to get good shots. Choosing camera
positions is THE big challenge for wedding videos.
• Lack of preparation time - all the gear
had been out on another gig immediately prior to this one, and I hadn't had a
chance to sort it all out. (more on that one later).
• Only two crew for 3 cameras. Not at all
ideal. I took a remote pan tilt head, but in the end I didn't set it up due to
lack of time.
Things that
went well?
• We were able to attend the rehersal. This
is really really key to doing a good job. Preparation is everything for a
'one-off' live event like this.
• The venue had great natural and
artificial lighting. This really helped, especially shooting against the dark
wood panelling at the back of the platform..
• We set up a wee LCD TV as a monitor to
let me see what the other operated camera was doing. This really helped as we
had no other means of communication. It allowed me to see when my fellow camop
was going for a close-up or a reaction shot, so I could match that with my own
shot. Since we only had one LCD TV we didn't do the same for the other camop,
which, with hindsight would have been very useful, though it still doesn't
resolve the 'who moves first' dilema.
• We used DVRack to record via firewire
directly to a laptop PC - this worked very well both as a preview monitor but
also it allowed us to record lots of pre-service footage without having to start
the tape, and then start the tape rolling only when the bride arrived. this
meant we could fit the entire service onto one 60 min tape. The added bonus was
that the footage was all available as a Quicktime file for editing without
having to digitise.
• Performance of the HDR-HC1 seemed
excellent. I had to shift the AE down a few stops to protect the highlights due
to direct sunlight streaming in and hitting some of the people on the platform,
but the colours seemed good and the resolution seemed very smooth compared to
other DV footage.
• We got a good strong audio recording to
minidisk which allowed us to fill any gaps in the on-camera audio recorded from
the PA.
• Framing in 16:9 worked very well in this
context. As a LOT of wedding shots are two shots of the bride + groom, FOB +
bride, MOB + FOB etc etc. you can do really nice tight two shots in a 16:9 frame
while still keeping tight in.
• No gotchas, dropouts, shudders, buzzes or
wheezes to spoil the footage that we took.
• Recording onto HDV worked well. Most of
the tapes we downconverted to DV for editing, but there was one shot of the
bride arriving which had the edge of the balcony in shot too much, and we were
able to capture it in HDV, re-crop it to DV res and end up with a better shot.
You wouldn't want to do that a lot though, as it adds a lot to the render
times.
Things that
went wrong?
⁃ The biggest issue really was not having a
3rd camera operator. We set up the third camera as static shot, and there were
definitely times when we could have done with it being re-framed or adjusted in
position. In hindsight I could have locked off my own camera and gone and
adjusted it, but that meant going down a set of stairs from the balcony which
seemed a big risk.
⁃ Camera positions weren't ideal. We ended
up 'crossing the line' on the shots of the vows, which wasn't great, and since
two out of the thee cams was up above the 'action' it sometimes felt like you
were peering down on it, a little detached.
⁃ Some framing mistakes - despite taping
off the viewfinder, I ended up cutting people off at the joints when framing (a
big NO NO). Fortunately most of these were on the camera recording in 4:3 and we
could nudge the shot up or down after cropping to 16:9.
⁃ Despite the monitor, both camops still
ocassionally moved at same time. Without a director calling the shots this was
hard to avoid, and is why you need a third 'wide' shot to cover and
simultaneous moves.
⁃ I forgot to turn off the steadyshot on
the HC1, which produced some slightly strange results when panning and tracking.
Most of these were coverable by other shots. The HC1 uses electronic image
stabilisation rather than optical, and is agruably slightly less smooth. The
moral is to turn it off whenever you are on a tripod.
⁃ We forgot to check the stage for ugly
wires etc. in shot. As a result one of the key shots of the couple has a large
black mains reel appearing in between their heads - oops!
⁃ We forgot to use a clapper or a flashgun
for providing a sync point between the 3 cameras. It was still possible to sync
them by listening to the audio, but would have been much easier if we had used a
clapper (or just a clap in view) or a flashgun flash.
⁃ I ended up having to re-solder some leads
at last minute (literally) to get it all working, since I hadn't actually laid
out all the cables beforehand to check I had the right things. This stress could
have been avoided by a cable 'walkthrough' prior to turning up at the
church.
Final
thoughts
So, in the end we were
able to make a nice DVD of the service and the reception, but it was all a bit
stressful and I admire folk who do this every weekend as a full time occupation.
We certainly learned stuff for VLOBLIVE gigs, but whether we will be brave
enough to ever do a wedding video again remains to be
seen!!
Dave
Posted: Thu - August 18, 2005 at 07:14 AM
|