Choosing cameras to use for IMAG at VLOBLIVE gigs
In the kind of budget range most VLOBLIVE gigs
are operating, your camera choice is going to be limited to pretty much whatever
you can get your hands on. However if you do have some choices, or if you are
looking to invest in purchasing some cameras, here are some pointers to help you
choose.
The first thing to bear in mind is that your
average VLOBLIVE gig is a very hostile environment for cameras for the following
reasons:
• You probably can't afford enough lighting
to make it look good
• You are probably working with volunteer
or inexperienced camops
• You probably DON'T have the luxury of
CCUs and an engineer tweaking camera settings during a gig.
• You don't have the money to buy the RIGHT
thing so you are going to have to compromise.
• You may well be using underpowered
projectors which limit the contrast ratio you can
achieve.
That said, let's look at each
option in turn:
• Current pro studio
cameras
•
• Good examples: Sony D35, JVC
KY29, etc.
You have probably found
that buying or even hiring current model pro studio cameras with all the
accessories is pretty much out of the question, but hey, if you can get one or
more of these, then GREAT - go for it!
They
will give the best results by far, and with the right lens selection are the
ideal choice for IMAG.
However remember that
you don't just need the camera, you also need the PSU, the lens (different
options available) and a decent tripod. This can all add
up.
Things to check for:
• is it the right aspect ratio - 4:3 vs
16:9?
• what kind of lens are you getting with
it? - wide angle? telephoto? does it have a 2x extender?
• if you are NOT going to use a PPU etc.
does the camera adapter have normal video out on BNC
connections?
Older Pro
Studio cameras
Good
examples:
Sony DXC range - M3,
325, 537, M7, BVP range
JVC KY27,
KY19, KY17
Ones to avoid: Sony DXC3000,
Panasonic F10, F15
A lot of studios are
upgrading their cameras to digital SDI systems so the secondhand market is full
of venerable old studio cameras that look just the biz for IMAG at live events
at apparently knock-down prices. These cams have all the controls to make your
life easy and are REALLY solid and reliable, as they are built for day-in
day-out use. In the right conditions they can produce exceptional
results.
BUT...be VERY VERY careful if you
are considering buying an older pro studio camera, and you don't really know
what you are doing.
Here are some things to
watch out for:
• minimum illumination - older cameras will
ONLY give good results in lots of light (i.e. in a studio). In fact most current
prosumer DV cams will do a better job in low light than some of these old
stagers. Watch out for a min illumination figure of 5 lux or 1 lux or 0.1 lux or
similar.
• Lenses are REALLY expensive and are not
always included.
• a lot of these systems are modular and
require both a camera front and a camera adapter back to make them
usable
• Most do NOT come with a PSU - you will
have to buy that separately
• Pro lenses need servicing - an old cheap
lens may be knackered! Both of the pro studio cams that we bought required lens
servicing at several hundred GBP a go.
• These cams are BIG and heavy and need a
pro tripod to make them usable
• ALL of these cams will have manual focus
lenses so your camops will have to be comfortable with focusing while
operating
• Very few of these cameras have an
'auto-everything' mode (the KY27 is a good exception) so you better be happy
setting up black level, white balance, etc.
• Try to get a lens with a 2x extender
built in to give you better zoom range BUT remember the 2x extender will add to
the cost and will loose light so it is only usable in decent levels of
lighting.
As a final warning let me say
that I have bought five of this category of camera, and had to get rid of three
of them! Caveat emptor.
Pro
DV or DVCPro Camcorders
This
is a similar category to the above, and the same principles apply. Newer or
current models will do great. Older ones will struggle in low light, and will be
big and heavy.
Prosumer 3-CCD miniDV
or HDV camcorder
Good examples:
Sony: HVR-Z1, HVR-FX1, HCR-HC1, PD170,
PD150, PD100, VX2100, VX2000, TRV950,
TRV900
Canon: XL2, XL1s, XL1, GL2,
XM1
Panasonic: GS400,
GS250
This is probably the most
realistic category to aim for. This class of miniDV or HDV camcorder is a good
compromise of image quality versus cost and size. The 3-chip CCDs mean good
resolution and colour quality, and most of these cameras allow manual control
over focus, exposure, gain etc, all of which are important. If you are
considering buying a DV camera for IMAG I STRONGLY recommend getting a camera in
this category, rather than a consumer
model.
The main advantages of this type
of camera are:
• affordable to buy new or
secondhand
• you may know people who have one and can
lend you it!
• they are small and
unobtrusive
• it is easy to get a good tripod for this
size of camera
• in good light image quality can be
excellent - as good as older pro cameras
• most have very usable auto-focus which
can help less experienced camops.
The
main disadvantages are;
• limited lens options - only the Canon XL
range have interchangable lenses. In general none of these cameras is going to
work from a front of house position for serious IMAG. (I'm going to assume you
know that DIGITAL zoom is totally useless and a waste of time)
• poor performance in low
light
• small size can make people think they can
use them handheld on stage - a BAD idea!
• manual focus controls can be fiddly to
use live
• menu-based controls can be fiddly to use
live
•
•
• Consumer 1-CCD miniDV or DVD
or Digital8 camcorders
•
• Good examples: Any 'handycam' or
other consumer DV cam
•
• This is another likely category for
'loaner' cameras, but it is a bit of a minefield. The image quality of this
category of camera is not really good enough for general IMAG use in low light,
so it's use can only really be recommended for specific limited applications
e.g. static POV cameras, remote pan-tilt cameras etc.
•
•
• Consumer 1-CCD Hi8 or VHS-C or
VHS (yikes!)
•
• Eh...just say 'no thanks'.
•
• CCTV
cameras
•
• The image resultion, colour quality etc. of these cameras is not
suitable for IMAG use, except in very specialised applications e.g. POV cameras
or 'gimmick' shots.
•
• Videoconferencing
cameras
•
• Many people are attracted
to these cameras due the the built-on remote pan/tilt/zoom controls. However the
quality of the CCD modules used in these cameras is NOT suitable for IMAG use,
and I don't recommend them.
•
• OK, that it then - lots of
options to suit different pockets, but some serious danger of disappointment if
you are not careful.
• As a general
rule when buying a camera, try to arrange to borrow or hire an equivalent model
and use it at a gig before you commit your
cash.
•
• Hope this helps.
Posted: Thu - January 12, 2006 at 09:36 AM
|