|
Competing Messages: Market for Destruction
David Brooks' column in the NY Times on the 27th of this month was something I enjoyed reading. I intend to offer some comments about it later, but I was also interested in some letters to the Times in response to it. In particular, one that said, in part:
David Brooks’s lament for the erosion of institutions in personal and social life is welcome. But he doesn’t mention its most important source: the values generated by unconstrained markets relentlessly driven to destroy the old in favor of the new.
By all means, read the entire letter. It's very brief.
Again and again, each and every day, we see the price of excess in our economic system. I'm not sure you can exactly call it "free market capitalism," because the market exploited government in its efforts to secure a competitive advantage. So government was involved, just not always in ways that were aligned with the interests of the governed.
Again and again we are reminded that markets, most emphatically, are not "conversations."
I believe, though I am by no means certain, that the root cause of the problem is excessive reliance on competition as an organizing principle. There are many other contributing problems, not the least of which is human nature. But competition compels all players to exploit every weakness in favor of achieving a competitive advantage. And to respect no boundaries, to observe no restraint, in the effort to achieve a competitive advantage.
As always, we have it exactly backwards. We are not consumers, we are the consumed.
Vendor Relationship Management, is not going to solve that problem. It doesn't begin to address the root causes. It's merely going to be a more comfortable way of killing ourselves. Just as the fallacious assertion, the pernicious lie, that "markets are conversations," has made commercial messages appear more palatable by giving them permission to intrude even more deeply into our social interactions.
When you want a better life, someone will sell it to you.
|