<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="iBlog 1.4.0" -->
<rss version="0.92">
  <channel>
    <title>Colin Spezowka's Weblog</title>
    <link>http://homepage.mac.com/cspez/blog</link>
    <description>Default Dot Mac Weblog</description>
    
    <copyright>All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:58:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:59:03 -0600</pubDate>
    <generator>iBlog 1.4.0</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title> <![CDATA[60,000 people attend hockey game -- outside!
]]> </title>
      <link> <![CDATA[http://homepage.mac.com/cspez/blog/C596310105/E1619863965/index.html]]> </link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>Game on. Over 6 hours + -20º = holy
$#!*</b></font></div>
 <br> <div><font face="Helvetica">I'm proud to say that I attended possibly one of
the most historic events ever in hockey: The Heritage Classic. Okay, I suppose
there was the '72 series. And the Oilers winning the cup x 5. And, other teams
winning the cup in the other 81 years. But, c'mon... everyone knows winning the
Stanley Cup is so
</font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>passé</i></font><font face="Helvetica">.
Having a struggling power play is way
cooler.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Anyhoo, back to the Heritage
Classic. Yes, it was awesome. So many people dumb enough to risk hypothermia
cheering on the old greats of the Habs and the '80's Oilers, how could it not be
awesome. It's too bad we lost the regular season game, but it didn't matter much
because Fuhr and Ranford put on quite a show in the MegaStars
game.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">But 20 years from now when my
kids (or much more likely, my sister's kids) ask me about that outdoor game ages
ago, I'll probably just tell them how freakin' cold it was. I did manage to take
a few pictures, so I even have proof I was there. For
example:</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica"> 
<img SRC="http://homepage.mac.com/cspez/blog/C596310105/E1619863965/Media/IMG_1172.jpg" height="250" width="334" alt="" /> 
</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Now, you're probably saying, "Colin,
that thumbs-up is kind of lame." That's
</font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>not</i></font><font face="Helvetica"> a
thumbs up. That's just the position that my arm happened to be frozen in. "Oh,
come on... you're totally making that up!" Oh, really? Look at that smile. Can
you not see the wincing pain in that
grin?</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Yes, it was cold. I would have to
say, I've never felt colder in my entire life. And I frostbit my ears once, so
that's saying something. Lets just say, I never thought I'd enjoy burning my
mouth and esophagus with hot chocolate so much. The worst was my feet. I
actually thought I frostbit the toes on my left foot, but they seem to be okay
now, so I guess it was just a close call. Before the event, I thought my feet
would be okay. I doubled up on the socks and wore boots with thinsulate lining.
And even more importantly, I had Heat Factory™ toe warmers. They are those
pad thingies that contain some sort of chemical concoction that, and I quote,
"keep your feet warm 5 hours or more". Here's another quote: "Approx. Avg. Temp.
37ºC". Here's what I have to say to that: 5 hours and 37º
</font><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>my ass</b></font><font face="Helvetica">.
I think I felt 15 minutes of slight heat. Nay, lukewarmedness. After that, it
felt more like my feet were keeping the "warmers"
warm.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">As a result, after I got home I
had to spend 15 minutes or so slowly defrosting my toes with a wet washcloth.
Imagine my surprise when I picked up my toe warmers only to find them smokin'
hot! Great, so when they're in my boots in -20ºC temperatures, they don't
do jack squat, but when they sit on my floor for five minutes (almost 7 hours
after opening them) they approach uncomfortably hot
status.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Tomorrow's high is supposed to
be 15º warmer. Mother nature's timing sucks.</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 00:36:05 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title> <![CDATA[5 &lt; 4.12
]]> </title>
      <link> <![CDATA[http://homepage.mac.com/cspez/blog/C802826167/E1776127619/index.html]]> </link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>&lt;Joe Schmo&gt;What is going
on!?!?&lt;/Joe Schmo&gt;</b></font></div>
 <br> <div><font face="Helvetica">So my Microsoft IntelliMouse Explorer (old skool
edition) started occasionally double-clicking when I was clearly single
clicking. While I was pretty sure it was the mouse, I thought since Windows XP
sometimes acts a little weird and Windows just sucks in general, that perhaps it
was some sort of crazy driver issue. The mouse cursor was a little jittery so I
thought maybe I was right. So I uninstalled the IntelliPoint driver/software and
thought, maybe there's a new version? I checked Microsoft's web site and sure
enough I see a 5.0 and click download instantly. I mean, that's 0.88 better than
the version I was using! But I installed version 5 and was disappointed to find
out that my double-click issue was still
there.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Now, it's no secret I hate
Microsoft. Many companies do things that I don't approve of. Yes, even Apple.
But Microsoft just seems to do it </font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>all
the time</i></font><font face="Helvetica">. That said, I loved my IntelliMouse
Explorer. So despite my intense hatred of them and even though the two Microsoft
mice I own I won in contests, I thought, "time to buy a new IntelliMouse
Explorer!" It's got a pretty good shape and feels pretty comfortable. But more
importantly, it's got those perfect dual thumb buttons that I use for copying
and pasting. The only concern was that it didn't last all that
long.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Well, now I'm going to buy a
Logitech mouse. Why? Reliability concerns? A little. Why else? 'Cause Microsoft
sucks and I hate them even more. Why? Because IntelliPoint 5.0 should really be
named IntelliSuck 0.1 alpha build
001.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">New features? Supports new mice
with the "tilt" scroll wheel (which I don't have) and a new button assignment
which cycles through windows. Oh, and
</font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>virtually every feature Colin uses has
been removed</i></font><font face="Helvetica">. When OS X 10.0 came out, it was
missing features that OS 9 had. But it was understandable because OS X was a
whole new OS so those features didn't exist and would have to be created from
scratch. But all these features missing in IntelliPoint
</font><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>were already
there</b></font><font face="Helvetica">!!!</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Here's
what I'm bitching about: As I mentioned above, I use the two side thumb buttons
for copy and paste. So ctrl-c and ctrl-v. But I use a SSH client for connecting
to unix systems and ctrl-c and ctrl-v don't work since ctrl combos need to be
sent to the remote host. For example ctrl-c is an excellent way to stop an SQL
query or a long running command. So the client uses the less popular shift-ins
and ctrl-ins combos for copy and paste. With IntelliPoint 4.12 I could select a
program, like my SSH client, and make special button assignments just for it.
Plus, you could assign keystrokes to buttons. Nice. So now I can copy paste
between my SSH client and other programs with just my
mouse.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">So with the new, "improved"
version, I go to set this up. Only, I can't make program specific assignments!
What?! "No problem", I think, "I can just globally assign shift-ins and ctrl-ins
since most programs support that for copy and paste in addition to ctrl-c and
ctrl-v." So I click on the drop down box to select "Keystrokes"... only it's not
there! This sucks hard. I then fire up <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/"><a
href="http://www.mozilla.org/">Mozilla Firebird</a></a> so I can surf
the 'net since I'm surely crazy and there's still a way to get this to work. I
do a search on Google and then middle click with the scroll wheel on a link. For
those not familiar with Mozilla or Mozilla Firebird, a middle click will open a
link in a new tab. That way I can keep my page of Google search results. For
those not familiar with tabbed browsing, you're missing out -- download Firebird
</font><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b><a
href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firebird/"><a
href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firebird/">now</a></a></b></font><font face="Helvetica">.
Anyway, much to my surprise I've just switched to a different running program.
No problem... this is just a new feature of 5.0. Back to the mouse control
panel. So I click on the drop down box for the scroll wheel to switch it to a
plain old middle click. Not there! Huh. Well, maybe if I just set it to "none".
Also not there. But there's "disabled", so let's give that a try. Middle click
on link... nothing. I guess they weren't kidding when they said
"disabled".</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Wow, what an upgrade. I
really can't figure out why they didn't just re-release Intellipoint 3.0... I
think it was about the same. Maybe even better. They could have just patched it
so it would support the new tilt-wheel on the new mice. I've been saying for a
while that I wouldn't buy anything from Microsoft, except mice. Now I can axe
the "except" part.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Logitech <a
href="http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm?page=products/details&CRID=3&CONTENTID=4998&countryid=2&languageid=1"><a
href="http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm?page=products/details&amp;CRID=3&amp;CONTENTID=4998&amp;countryid=2&amp;languageid=1">MX500</a></a>,
here I come.</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 00:09:47 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title> <![CDATA[The Blog Continues
]]> </title>
      <link> <![CDATA[http://homepage.mac.com/cspez/blog/C802826167/E1251607627/index.html]]> </link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>You can't get rid of me that
easily.</b></font></div>
 <br> <div><font face="Helvetica">Yeah, it's been a while since I've blogged. I
think it's mostly due to the fact that I've contracted SARS or West Nile, or
something. BTW, if you have an extra lung kicking around, I wouldn't mind taking
it off your hands... I seem to have lost one of mine
somewhere.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">So I haven't fallen off the
face of the planet, just too sick to feel like doing much of anything. Except
install Panther (Mac OS X 10.3). Twice. So far I like it. But anyway, I've got
some more blog entries planned, so hopefully I don't go over a week without a
post anytime soon. Possible subjects include Panther and iTunes vs. the world.
Or whatever else pops into my head... I have been taking a lot of drugs this
last week.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>P.S. Send <a
href="http://www.pfizer.com/do/counter/allergy/mn_halls.html"><a
href="http://www.pfizer.com/do/counter/allergy/mn_halls.html">Halls</a></a>.</i></font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2003 23:42:17 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title> <![CDATA[The End of Reality
]]> </title>
      <link> <![CDATA[http://homepage.mac.com/cspez/blog/C1612392630/E1128686584/index.html]]> </link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>Joe Schmo finale. Reality
bites.</b></font></div>
 <br> <div><font face="Helvetica">I watched the finale of the Joe Schmo show. I
haven't been watching the show that carefully, but seeing that Spike TV was
showing reruns virtually 24 hours a day, I've probably only missed one or two
episodes.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Anyhoo, the show was okay
overall. Probably the funniest was Kip. He was so over the top, if something was
going to tip off Matt, I think Kip would have. Matt seemed to take the truth
pretty well which surprised me because I had heard "Molly" in a radio interview
on The Bear's morning show and she said that he wouldn't return any of their
calls. Now, I was probably only semiconscious, so it's possible I misheard.
Although, in the "Aftermath" show, he did seem a little peeved about a few
things.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">So that's it for reality TV for
me... for now anyway. I'm not watching Survivor this time, so as of now I'm
reality TV free. Which is probably good because I think reality TV will soon go
away... mostly. I think shows like Paradise Hotel and The Joe Schmo Show are a
sign that the end is near. To draw viewers, reality shows have gotten either
stranger or more outrageous (read: dumber) and I think some of the newer ones
have stepped a couple steps beyond the imaginary line where people just get sick
of the silliness. Albeit a line that I've made up in my head. But I think we'll
probably see one more surge of shows, a year maybe two, and then they'll taper
off.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">I don't think they'll all
disappear -- just drop down to a more acceptable level. Survivor, The Amazing
Race, and (maybe) Big Brother have the best chance for survival. Most likely I'm
totally wrong and reality TV shows will prevail for decades to come. Hell,
</font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>I</i></font><font face="Helvetica">
watched Paradise Hotel, one of the most ridiculous reality shows ever. I like to
call that the Train Wreck Effect. It's a horrible mess which crushes people in
its tangled mess, but you have to watch it. You just stare and wonder if it
could get any worse. It did, by the way. But a lot of us watched Jerry Springer
and eventually we got tired of it and all that it spawned. Of course, Maury (aka
Paternity Test TV) is still on, but you don't see the saturation that you saw
back in the day.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Bring on the next
fad....</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2003 23:21:56 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title> <![CDATA[iTunes for the masses
]]> </title>
      <link> <![CDATA[http://homepage.mac.com/cspez/blog/C802826167/E1518961229/index.html]]> </link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>Now PC users can see what good software
is like. :)</b></font></div>
 <br> <div><font face="Helvetica">Okay, all you PC folk. Download <a
href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/">iTunes</a> for Windows as soon as
possible! Finally I can dump Winamp and its crappy library management. I've
tried tons of players on Windows including RealPlayer, MusicMatch, and even
*</font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>gasp</i></font><font face="Helvetica">*
Windows Media Player. Trust me, they are all junk. Or at least just mediocre.
iTunes is by far the best for all your audio playback needs... except WMA. Of
course if you encode and download songs in WMA format, you have much greater
problems then not being able to play them back in iTunes. I suggest you
immediately seek psychiatric help.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Now
that I've mentioned WMA, let me get something off my chest. You may have seen
claims, whether by Microsoft or MP3 player manufacturers, that WMA files at
64kbps are equivalent in quality to 128kbps MP3s. Or instead you might have seen
the bold claim on MP3 player boxes, "Stores
</font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>x</i></font><font face="Helvetica">
number of MP3s or
2</font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>x</i></font><font face="Helvetica">
number of WMAs", which is based off of the first claim. Well, I've listened and
it's not even close. Yes, MP3 is an old format and WMA is probably better
quality, but let's not get crazy. 64kbps WMAs sound like crap, just like 64kbps
MP3s sound like crap.
&lt;/rant&gt;</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Back to iTunes, yes, it
rocks. Just click on that nice little "Browse" button in the top, right corner.
Ahhhh... sooo nice. Now you can easily find songs by a certain artist, album, or
both. iTunes also works best when you have "Keep iTunes Music folder organized"
and "Copy files to iTunes Music folder when adding to library" turned on in the
advanced preferences. I'm sure iTunes may not seem great to some at first mainly
because many will be accustomed to how Winamp works best when just organizing by
file name. If you are going to give up or are getting frustrated, e-mail me or
talk to the nearest Mac guy/gal. Once you get iTunes set up properly, you'll
never turn back. Especially once you get into things like smart playlists and
music sharing. The only thing I might miss from Winamp is the slim windowshade
mode. Maybe someone will be able to make something like <a
href="http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/17100">Synergy</a>
on the PC.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Now here's hoping that the
iTunes Music Store becomes available in Canada soon!</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 22:00:27 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title> <![CDATA[A New Hope?
]]> </title>
      <link> <![CDATA[http://homepage.mac.com/cspez/blog/C802826167/E1305491846/index.html]]> </link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>Welcome to the next episode of "The Data
Recovery of Our Lives". PowerBook Update.</b></font></div>
 <br> <div><font face="Helvetica">So I called ADR like I said I would in my last
entry. The guy swears that the data is fine and that they actually opened and
looked at some of the files and they were okay. He even said the PDFs that they
were having problems with worked fine once they upgraded to Adobe Reader 6 from
Acrobat Reader 5. We decided that it must be something wrong with the CDs, or
more likely, the burning of the CDs. So now I have to ship the CDs back (boo) so
they can see what went wrong and then they'll send me new CDs. So gather 'round
and place your bets. Will the data be good or still very, very bad? Tune in next
time to find out!</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">In other news, the
PowerBook still r0x0rs. I do miss the compact size of the iBook, but the 15"
wide-screen makes up for it. Battery life seems pretty good although it just
might seem that way because my iBook's battery isn't what it used to be after 2
years of use. The battery seems to charge faster, too. Virtual PC runs really
well to my surprise. Windows 2000 is actually, dare I say, responsive! Still
slow compared to a real, bona fide PC, but great for just having to fire up the
odd PC program. Even Windows 98 was virtually unusable in VPC on my iBook, so
this was good to see. I still haven't burned a DVD yet, so I'll have to try that
out sometime. And in the surprise department, I qualified for the Mac OS X
Up-to-Date program so I get OS X 10.3 Panther for a mere $30 even though I
bought the 'Book before the October 8th deadline. Schweet.</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:32:53 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title> <![CDATA[$700 for Garbage
]]> </title>
      <link> <![CDATA[http://homepage.mac.com/cspez/blog/C802826167/E8228415/index.html]]> </link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>I'm selling all of my possessions and
moving far, far away.</b></font></div>
 <br> <div><font face="Helvetica">For those that have watched the excellent movie,
Shallow Grave, try to visualize the end of the movie. Remember the part where
the guy stabs Ewan McGregor through the shoulder? And then the girl kills the
guy and Ewan McGregor thinks she's going to pull the knife out but then she just
jams it in further so the knife is all the way through and sticks into the
floor?</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">That's how I feel. You see, as
I've already mentioned, I had a bit of a hard drive disaster recently. That's
the knife in my shoulder by IBM. So I sent it off to this drive recovery place
in Toronto called Accurate Data Recovery. They sounded small, but they were
cheap and sounded pretty upfront. Everything seemed to be fine and they said
that it was a head failure but once they replaced it everything was fine. There
was a small area of damage to the platter, but most files were
okay.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">So I got the CDs today. Now, how
would you feel if you spent $700 to get your data recovered only to get 3 CDs
full of mostly corrupt data? Like someone just jammed that knife in further? I'd
guess that 90% of the files are corrupted to various degrees. $700 worth of
extra pain from the guys who I thought were going to help
me.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">Now I have to call these guys on
Tuesday and see if I can get a refund or something. Even if it's not a 100%
refund, I'll be okay. But if I get nothing back, I
</font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>will</i></font><font face="Helvetica">
go ballistic. I will scream. I will demand. I
</font><font face="Helvetica-Oblique"><i>will</i></font><font face="Helvetica">
call the BBB. I will drop a nuclear bomb on Toronto just to wipe these guys
out.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">So maybe I'm overreacting a little
bit seeing that I haven't even talked to them yet. Maybe they'll be really
helpful and will give me a refund without a hassle. But judging from my luck in
the last while, I'll need to prepare for a
fight.</font><br /><br /><font face="Helvetica">And I thought things were going
to start getting back to normal around here. If more stuff happens that I have
to worry about, I think I'm going to just give up on my life, as I know it. I'll
have to sell everything I own, move to a new city (preferably somewhere warm),
and become a minimalist. Or maybe I'll just move into that nice hospital in
Ponoka.</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:31:38 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title> <![CDATA[Hockey
]]> </title>
      <link> <![CDATA[http://homepage.mac.com/cspez/blog/C596310105/E227675798/index.html]]> </link>
      <description> <![CDATA[<div><font face="Helvetica-Bold"><b>Hockey</b></font></div>
 <br> <div><font face="Helvetica">Hockey!!! Oilers!!! Yay!!!</font></div>
]]> </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 17:55:00 -0600</pubDate>
    </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>
