Struggle for Common Sense...conversation
A recounting of a Tuesday evening event I
attended on Capitol Hill - the Conversation. This is an art-oriented discussion
between invited guests and an audience, held in a round-table forum-like
environment where the guests give opening thoughts and then invite a
"conversation." Also, new photos of Fall in West Seattle (actually, Fall in my
yard - how's that!) and a few night shots taken Tuesday evening while I traipsed
up to and later down from Capitol HIll.
For about a year now I've subscribed to a local
group, dorkbot-sea, which is the local chapter of what started in New York -
dorkbot-nyc. Dorkbot's motto is "people doing strange things
with electricity," (see <http://dorkbot.org/> for links to the local
dorkbots). It's an umbrella organization which sponsors demonstrations,
exhibits, hosts speakers and in general tries to tie together the world of
artists - kinetic, light, sound, motion - and engineers and scientists and
anyone else who tinkers with "things" but whose product is generally considered
"art."I must admit that I've never
actually attended a dorkbot meeting. They're held locally in the space of
another umbrella organization - the Center On the Contemporary Arts (COCA, which is
yet another non-profit organization which fosters exhibits, helps with grants
and tries to introduce contemporary artists to their public and the public to
the various arts of contemporary Northwest artists). However, I've subscribed
to the dorkbot-sea mailing list and have attended a few of the events which have
been highlighted in the dorkbot-sea mailing. It's another of the seemingly
ubiquitous arts organizations our here. I think one of the things which might
set Seattle (and the Northwest in general) apart from other sections of the
country is the overwhelming and early acceptance of technology and its use to
keep groups of like-minded individuals linked.
I'm evolving, myself. But, one of
they ways I'm evolving is by acquiring a sense of the pulse of the region
through these mailing lists and by participating in those events which are cited
and seeing for myself where I might fit in. I've really got no particular plans
- as might seem obvious - but I do have this interest in stirring things up for
the better, an interest in combining my various talents to create new "art," and
in acquiring and honing even more skills in the creative fields. I'm also a
civic activist, as has become apparent in the last year. It now seems that my
civic activism might be acquiring some direction now that I've had a year's
worth of events under my belt. One of
the dorkbot listings cited an event which apparently has been a long-running
series here in Seattle. It's called the "Conversation," and is hosted by John
Boylan, a longtime Seattle art activist, he's a professional writer and editor
and was the former editor of the art magazine "Reflex" (I've not yet found
enough about it on the web, will have to visit a book or magazine store downtown
and do some more digging). Previously, as I understand the apparent ten-year
history of the "conversation," the topic has always been "art" and something
relevant to the particular time of the conversations (I'll drop the quotes from
here out).So, this dorkbot-sea
listserve announces the "return" of the conversations. The topic for the
conversation is called "the struggle for common sense in the world of tomorrow -
what do we do now?" It's at seven o'clock on a Tuesday night up in the "art"
quarter of Capitol Hill. The guests are artist and activist Mary Anne Peters;
activist, poet, and teacher Bob Spivey; journalist Cydney Gillis; and artist and
activist Lisa Bade. Their collective bios include working for civil rights in
the '60s, working on women's issues here in Seattle, working with prisoners
using art as a therapy approach, grass-roots efforts with both Nader and early
Green Party activities, and lots and lots of activities with and without the
ACLU working on arts issues such as the famous/infamous Robert Maplethorpe
exhibit in Cincinnatti. This is a group of individuals ranging in age from
about their late thirties through just a bit older than me. We even shared some
common activities associated with the Vietnam War protests and the efforts to
impeach Richard Nixon. Boylan appears to be in his late forties. The venue,
though, suggested an audience more like the twenty-somethings who frequent the
clubs up and down Pine and along the Broadway strip on Capitol
Hill.I didn't really know what to
expect, to tell the truth. What was "the conversation," what was the purpose
and what might be the outcome or the experience. Anyway, it seemed something
right up my alley - a bit off-the-wall, a bit of activism, a bit of
out-of-the-box thinking, and a lot of displeasure with the status quo. A full
description of the bios of the guests is at
<http://www.music.columbia.edu/pipermail/dorkbotsea-blabber/2004-November/000748.html>
(which apparently is a Columbia University archive of dorbot-sea messages).
I arrived a bit before seven and went
into the Capitol Hill Arts Center, which features a full-service bar-restaurant
on the first floor and is located on one of Capitol Hill's "off" streets - 12th
Avenue - sort of midway between Broadway and 15th Avenue, the Hill's two
north-south major avenues. I asked where the "lower level" was, since the
conversation was going to take place there according to the notice. "Down and
around the corner of the building and you'll see it." Then, as an aside to
another person behind the bar, "we ought to get the signpost out on the street."
Indeed. I walked around and below the building into what was previously the
loading dock and lower level. It's been converted into a small TV studio which
opens directly to another bar with a large open space between them filled with
round tables and chairs and an mid level against one wall which looks like the
classic corner area of a 1950's era diner. Interesting space, indeed. The
television set up is apparently for a cable show which is broadcast live
beginning at eight o'clock. There are already about two dozen folks, from their
mid-thirties through mid-fifties, getting drinks and standing around and
chatting as if they'd known each other for half-a-lifetime. At just about
seven, Boylan, who I didn't know and couldn't guess earlier, announces that
anyone here for the "conversation" had better grab a seat and add to what was an
already-large and forming circle of chairs around a central table.
I was lucky in that there was an empty
seat open right next to the table, and as it turns out right across from the
four guests and Boylan. I still had no idea what was going to happen. I
expected these four would give some accounting of things relevant to art and
perhaps the present course the country was on. Boylan gets things started by
giving a bit of background on the conversations, how they're done and who would
go first and what the time constraints would be. I'm getting a clue now. The
conversations are just that. Boylan has a series of guests, who give some
relevant and weighted comment on the topic (in this case, "what do we do now")
and then anyone in the room can talk - in turn - essentially having a
conversation with the guests and everyone
else.It should surprise no one that
the collected group known as "the liberals," or "the progessives," or even a
large constituency of the Democratic Party, are artists, scientists, and more
recently, lawyers. Artists are very liberal creatures. Artists of all sorts.
Their managers may be more conservative but the nature of art somewhat defines
that person as one who takes risks, who steps outside and may even live outside
the "norm." This conversation was about what was happening in America and how
it would affect the artist community, the activist community, the individuals
who had spent a lifetime fighting for civil rights, for equality, for a
broadening of what had previously been called "local" standards of art. The
arts have come quite far in the past several decades. There are still places
which ban books, which ban certain art exhibits, which ban certain performers,
which try and arrest these same types for infractions of local or state law.
But, in general, the arts of America have evolved quite far. This group was
concerned that the current administration and especially the evangelical bent of
certain members of the administration would try and limit artists' freedoms and
the freedoms of their audience. Or, perhaps even worse than that, would begin
to sanctify an America which was more of a theocracy than a democracy. Artists
come in all colors, flavors and creeds. None are as vanilla as what it seemed
the evangelical community was looking for in what they would accept. It was
almost as if the art community were in a discussion about a declaration of war
against the direction it seemed America was
headed.It reminded me a lot of the
presentation by Ursula K. Le Guin the previous week. Clearly, the politics of
America were affecting the art of America and here were some sixty or so
individuals who were active artists, active civil rights protagonists, active
soldiers in the quest for continued and more freedoms and a broader and more
diverse culture, not a narrower and more defined
culture.It would be difficult to
capture the thread of the two hours of continuous and well-reasoned and
occasionally impassioned comments made by the guests and the audience. The
conversation went just as one might expect a well-stocked college symposium to
proceed. I contributed with the story about the individual who had stolen away
to his evangelical family's garage to read Le Guin's "The Dispossessed" and how
that reading had opened his mind and given that individual a new life. There
were others who decried the threat to freedoms and the control the media had
over certain segments of the population. There were some who recalled their own
experience - in one case as a Japanese prisoner-of-war - and how it taught them
to fight oppression and government control. There was an evolving sense over
the two hours as to how the arts could rise again to depict what the artists
thought was going wrong with the evolution of their country's culture and how
art itself, but more importantly, art as a social force, might be able to work
into the situation in such a way that minds would be opened, ideas planted, a
few narrow-minded individuals shown a larger universe. It was two hours filled
with dark thoughts followed by bright opposing views countered by murky and
depressing examples followed by enlightening and sustaining counter-examples.
In the end, at least one of the speakers responded that her dark and worrisome
view of the future was perhaps too dark and that some of what she had heard and
discussed would change things and that she, herself, had come in with a
pessimistic world view but would leave with at least a few ounces of hope and
inspiration. There were a number of twenty-somethings who were there, not as
many as most would have liked, but who spoke up and gave their personal stories,
either as a local artist, or someone affected by the arts and how it was the art
community which had given them hope and changed something inside them.
The conversation was an amazing
experience. Not something which was that different from myriad conversations
I've taken part in myself with friends or colleagues at work or home, but
amazing in that this was a group of people, a high proportion of whom knew each
other, who were discussing with complete strangers some very fundamental
feelings and expressing lessons learned from decades of practice in the arts and
in the realms of art and social activism. Like so many things, this had a
tremendously additive factor. Any single individual there might have continued
with their view of how things are evolving and how they might change that, but
the collective discussions enlarged everyone's perspective. These were really
bright and uncommonly open-minded individuals, obviously liberal but not
completely secular. One of the speakers was Mennonite and was committed to both
the faith and the way of life of the Mennonites. Her comments and world view
were as a teacher and as a pacifist in a world of individuals seemingly opposed
to education and using extreme aggression and yet her outlook and comments were
profoundly positive as was her experience with those she taught.
There is a lot anyone can do and the
accepted notion that we could "not change" the course of the evolution of the
country was turned around such that I believe everyone who was there left with
some idea of how his or her art, or teaching, or activism could affect at least
one other person and it was the collective effort of everyone which mattered the
most. Not the directed efforts of everyone working together on a single
manifesto, but the individual efforts of everyone working individually but with
a knowledge of what was happening and what was meaningful to them and how much
their art or teachings or music or writings might affect just a single person
but the number of such affected individuals over time would be a large
proportion of the population and that aggregate did matter. No, the arts
couldn't change the course of the country in one fell swoop and it couldn't
possibly be coordinated or run like the Karl Rove and evangelical
church-directed "moral values" theme, but we were out to try and open people's
minds, to show them a larger world, to expose them to culture from different
elements of the human race and that effort - though the same as moving one grain
of sand at a time - was going to ultimately be more effective than some media
campaign or some political propaganda because it was the core inner-person the
arts were trying to reach and the voter element of that inner-person would
respond accordingly as the core beliefs of each individual grew and expanded.
This is another element of the city
here which I've been taken by. I'll be at the next conversation and have added
myself to John Boylan's mailing list and offered a bit of who I am and what I
might offer to him. It's really hard to see where this might lead but it is
clear to me that there are lots of opportunities to illuminate dark areas of the
human soul without having to resort to trickery or well-worn media ploys or
manipulation. Along the same lines I've recently offered some ideas to the
local branch of the Seattle Public Library (they're about to close it for a year
to completely revise and improve the physical space) and was really
well-received by the library staff and members of the "Friends of the Library."
Some of the ideas I presented had more to do with introducing people who walk by
the library building all the time but never go in. Going inside a library is
the first start in getting an individual to expand their own mind. The
libraries here all have high-speed internet as well as books, movies, music and
images of art and photography. There are just too many folks who get everything
they know about the world from a handful of conglomerate media companies, all of
which have as a root cause the desire to sell their audience something.
Libraries aren't selling anything, they're offering free-of-charge an
opportunity for the individual to explore their world on their own terms. It's
clear that too many individuals in this country as well as a great number of
recent immigrants have no realization whatsoever of the wealth of information
and history and culture which is theirs for the asking.
Following up on the Red States, Blue
States thoughts I posted earlier, I've moved in the direction of becoming much
more active in the dissemination and outreach areas - clearly one of the things
I have done and can do well and an area of human endeavor which really drives
me. Also, it gives me some ideas of where and how to express myself through the
various multimedia arts I'm playing with.
The evolution of society continues.
The evolution of individuals continues. My evolution continues. I am beginning
to feel reasonably comfortable in a much wider array of local activities and
with a broader group of individuals. I'm also becoming somewhat better known.
There was a local exposition of community activities including volunteer,
government, and non-profit organizations at the local high school this
afternoon, They had three hours of local music, food, and discussion at tables
set up by about fifty local organizations (by local I mean West Seattle,
particularly Delridge neighborhood). I spent all three hours there engaged in
discussion and conversation with a variety of these organizations. Adam and a
neighbor and her son also came with me and were separately engaged as well. We
sat through several of the musical performances but each of us sort of went our
own way in between. What surprised me was how many people there I already knew
or had had previous engagements with, how many my neighbor knew and had some
previous shared activity with, and surprisingly, how many Adam knew and had done
something with - either through the YMCA (where he works as a lifeguard) or
through South Seattle Community College. Seattle - and as I said, the Northwest
in general - is a very inviting climate and culture for people to share and
create common spaces and common futures. There are issues of getting consensus
and some things - like Monorail - seem to take forever, but this place actually
fits my style very well. I like discussion. I like hearing new ideas or even
opposing ideas. I like creating common goals and working towards them and I
especially like the congenial style of the West Coast in approaching something
like this. The really great element
of all this for me is that I've finally got the time to devote myself to some of
these things with a gusto which is uninterrupted by work-related politics. All
those decades of working for NASA I knew how much the agency was tied directly
into and affected by the national political will and, in particular, the
partisan politics of the party in power, but I don't think I realized how much
of a toll on me personally this national political will was taking. One reason
I voraciously consumed news so much was it was obvious to me that even the
tiniest elements of local politics somewhere else in the country were going to
affect NASA somehow and through the agency, me. I'm completely freed of that
relationship now and though I may be distressed by the direction the country is
going in or by the policies of the President or even the Governor, it doesn't
affect me twice - once through my personal self and once through my professional
self. It's amazing how much of a stress the professional self took through
political actions. I can see that now because I can detach my passions from my
concerns and look at things from a synoptic view whereas previously the synoptic
view was impossible to achieve because I was enmeshed inside the fabric
itself.Minor additional point, I got
my SIFF card in the mail today. I'm now a member of Cinema
Seattle, the mothership for the Seattle International Film Festival,
so this coming May 19 - June 12, 2005, festival will be even more of a
kick-in-the-butt because I'll get the schedule a bit earlier and have a moderate
discount on blocks of tickets. There's ticket books of 6, 20 and so on up to
the full listing of three-hundred or so flicks. Last year I saw just shy of a
dozen, this year I'll probably up that number to at least two dozen. Some of
the SIFF screenings I saw last year are now making the rounds in regular cinema
such as Dig, Open Water, Haute Tension, Primer. It's become one of the things I look
forward to now. So, even though it's six months away, expect even more
reviews.ChasFall
in my front and side yards in West
Seattle A
one image macro photo of the leaves on one of the two maples on SW Monroe Street
- the front yard. Yes, the grass is still
green and
growing. A
two-image sequence taking shots of different trees in the yard from different
angles and distances. Thesingle, floating,
leaf was actually hanging from a single spider thread. The following images
show a varietyof additional two-image
sequences shot in the front - SW Monroe Street - and side - 39th Avenue SW
yards.              The
corner of SW Monroe St. (left) and 39th Avenue SW (right) with one of my maples
and the plum (right) aswell as a
rhododendron (left near) and something (??)(center near) - I'm still learning
the plants in my
yard. Space
Needle in moderate fog taken from corner of 3rd Avenue
andWall Street in Belltown,
Seattle. Same
street corner, this time not including overhead trolley electric
wires. Looking
across 1st Avenue near Denny Way at the Pacific Science Center's filigree
lattice arches. The PacificScience Center
is on the southern boundary of Seattle Center right on Denny
Way. On
2nd somewhat east of Pacific Science Center at Denny Way. Time was about 10:00
pm on a
Wednesday. Denny
Way (right) crossing 2nd Avenue (front) on my way to First Avenue to catch the
bus home. I was inBelltown for a meetup and
decided to walk north for a change, rather than south, to catch the bus nearer
theSeattle Center rather than my usual
catch-spot near Pike Place Market. Downtown Seattle is absolutely
wonderful for anyone who likes to walk -
it's accessible, easy distances, and has such great visual points
ofinterest - nearly everywhere. It's every
bit as eye-catching in a modern, stylized manner as Washington,
DCis in a neo-classical manner. And the
streets here have the same number of odd angles with circles,
trianglesand odd-angle intersections as does
DC - Pierre L'Enfant would love this town were he alive today -
thereare end-points along every avenue and
distant visual scapes from nearly every location in
town.Prepare for
Thanksgiving, it's only 12 days away. I've already put in our order
forone pumpkin and
one apple pie (Great Harvest breads - Ballard, West Seattle,
Shoreline)and 2
dozen classic yeast rolls. Turkey is next to
get.More
drama, long theses, and photographs coming your way
shortly...
Posted: Sat
- November 13, 2004 at 10:13 PM
|
Quick Links
Categories
Calendar
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
|
Archives
XML/RSS Feed
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Jul 04, 2005 05:41 PM
|