Are We Snatching Defeat....
...from the jaws of
victory?The old adage that says "It is
always darkest before the dawn" might be very apropos at this point in time.
Newly empowered Democrats are feeling
their oats, and are pressing back against every aspect of the war in Iraq. The
newly disenfranchised GOP congressional delegation is starting to go wobbly on
several fronts as they seem to fear total annihilation in 2008 if they don't
knuckle under to political pressure and offer collaboration
with the Dems to save their own
skin.However, while some may see this
point in the war as the most desperate hour (fed by the election and the
negative press), is it possible that it is just the dark time before the
dawn?Perhaps some Congressional
Republicans should turn off the broadcast media, and read some of the optimistic
insights that are out there. One such essay is one by Iraqi Nibras Kazimi, titled
'Turnaround
in Baghdad'
"The wider Sunni insurgency — the groups beyond Al Qaeda — is being slowly, and surely, defeated. The average insurgent today feels demoralized, disillusioned, and hunted. Those who have not been captured yet are opting for a quieter life outside of Iraq. Al Qaeda continues to grow for the time being as it cannibalizes the other insurgent groups and absorbs their most radical and hardcore fringes into its fold. The Baathists, who had been critical in spurring the initial insurgency, are becoming less and less relevant, and are drifting without a clear purpose following the hanging of their idol, Saddam Hussein.....Last October, my sources began telling me about rumblings among the insurgent strategists suggesting that their murderous endeavor was about to run out of steam. This sense of fatigue began registering among mid-level insurgent commanders in late December, and it has devolved to the rank and file since then. The insurgents have begun to feel that the tide has turned against them."
This Iraqi offers one succinct
piece of advice, that all in Washington should heed:
"Never mind who takes credit, kill or capture more of the killers to ensure victory."
Perhaps politicians could put a hold on
their pontifications long enough for victory to just possibly emerge despite the
pessimism. But what are the chances of that?
UPDATE: In a separate forum, Kazimi
also points out the possibly manipulation of CBS by
al-Qaeda in Iraq. Kazimi also highly recommends this posting on a
comparison of Iraq
and Guadalcanal, and "what might be the consequences of
victory?"
So let’s think of Iraq as Guadalcanal. The enemy shouldn’t have chosen to fight there, but they did. They chose to turn Iraq into a major battlefield – not us. We still can – and should – win. When we win, we will probably all – like the Americans after Guadalcanal – breath a sigh of relief that somehow it all ended up turning out okay. But for our enemies, defeat in Iraq will be for them what defeat at Guadalcanal was for Imperial Japan – crushing, catastrophic, and cataclysmic. That is the “upside potential.” Those are the consequences of victory. And these alone are reason enough to push on boldly.
Posted: Tue - January 30, 2007 at 10:37 PM
|
|