United 93 - Too Soon?



Is the making and release of United 93 being done too soon? For one, I don't think so. But I am willing to say there is no right answer on this one, as each person's psyche and their 9/11 experience are going to be different.



There is an easy answer...for those who do think it is too soon, don't go see it. But I feel that it is important that we as a nation remember what happened on that day, and raw imagery from that day is an important part of it.

Fortunately for the rest of us, many of those most affected by Flight 93, feel that it is not too soon. The family members were a critical part of the making of this film. David Beamer (father of Todd Beamer) reminds us that this is not a typical Hollywood outing:
Paul Greengrass and Universal set out to tell the story of United Flight 93 on that terrible day in our nation's history. They set about the task of telling this story with a genuine intent to get it right--the actions of those on board and honor their memory. Their extensive research included reaching out to all the families who had lost loved ones on United Flight 93 as the first casualties of this war. And Paul and his team got it right.

For some more insight into Mr Greengrass and family members, I highly recommend viewing the short "A Look Inside " trailer



John Pohoretz laments the fact that since soon after 9/11, the media have seen fit to purge the national tapestry of any traumatic imagery from the attacks.
ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2001, ABC News president David Westin decided that his network would no longer air footage of the attacks on the World Trade Center only a week before. The constant repetition of the images of the planes crashing into the buildings had become "gratuitous," a spokesman said. Almost immediately, all other networks and news channels adopted the same policy, and ever since, it is only on rare occasions that Americans have been exposed to those indelible images. This extraordinary act of journalistic collusion followed another mysteriously unanimous decision to censor the photographs and moving images of those victims who had chosen to jump to their deaths rather than be burned alive. … One gets the impression that the video footage is kept largely under wraps because of the emotions it might provoke. Someone is trying to protect us from the neurochemical cocktail of grief and rage, sorrow and anger, trauma and vengefulness that even a few minutes' conversation about 9/11 can cause. Or, perhaps, some in the media might feel as though the imagery is almost too politicized. Perhaps because George W. Bush invokes the attacks and their meaning so frequently, leading figures in the media believe the imagery will tend to buttress Bush's arguments, and serve as unpaid advertising for the president's policies. … There's a lot of talk about whether Americans are "ready" to see a movie about 9/11. Some of that talk is doubtless due to the same attitude that says Americans can't possibly stomach seeing footage of the crashes, or the buildings falling. Such infantilization is an insult both to Americans, who are perfectly capable of handling such things, and to the memories of those who perished in the attacks, whose public murders are being treated as though they had been quiet and private deaths.

But if you are still deciding whether you might go see this movie, Varifrank argues that we must, in order that the censorship as described by Podhoretz does not become that standard.
If United 93 fails at the box office, the war on terror will be re-written in our popular culture the way that returning Vietnam vets were re-written from normal people into murdering psychopaths let loose on the general population. Like it or not, what passes for popular culture very often serves as the basis of history. Popular culture is often the lens by which historical events are later interpreted. If we are not careful to support this movie because of our collective sense of “survivors guilt”, then the failure of United 93 will serve as a springboard for furthering the cause defeatism that permeates most of modern era popular culture. No matter our victories in this war of which United 93 represents just the first, popular culture is already working to marginalize them as inconsequential. A ‘defeat at the marketplace” of United 93, will further make the case for those who think we must “lose to win” in their perverted logic in the worship of failure.

So go buy a ticket, even if you don't intend to go to see the film. Those sales/donations might help win the culture war to decide who writes the history of 9/11.


Posted: Sat - April 29, 2006 at 10:05 PM          


©