Questions about "Incredible Courage"
More on the NYT moves towards
irrelevance...
Many of the uber-bloggers (LGF,
Michelle
Malkin, Powerline) have
already covered the story of how the NYT has decided that it is somehow
courageous for one of its own to hang-out with scumbags while in the act of
targeting the military forces of the United
States.
A sniper loyal to Shiite cleric
Moqtada al Sadr fires towards U.S. positions in the cemetery in Najaf,
Iraq.
Michele McNally: "Right there with
the Mahdi army. Incredible
courage."Now what about this example
is courageous? Is the photog, Joao Silva, courageous because at any moment the
Mahdi Army whackos could kill him for being an infidel? Or is he courageous
because at any moment the room he is sharing with an enemy sniper could come
under a fusillade of fire from US troops? What exactly defines courage in this
example Mizz McNally?Lets also take this
one step further. What if that room
had
drawn return fire from US troops, and what if Mr. Silva had been killed as a
result? What would the NYT say in that instance? Would they fan the flames of
scandal because US troops had killed a
journalist?What would it be Mizz
McNally? You freely disregard the lives of
your own country's servicemen for the sake of publishing a good picture, but
would you vilify them if they defended themselves and accidentally killed the
human embodiment of your
disregard?Just something I'd like to
know....UPDATE: In case you might be
wondering what side the media might be on sometimes, lets take a look at what
they actually say about situations just like the one with the photo
above...."Pinch"
Sulzberger:
“Pinch was a political activist in the Sixties, and was twice arrested in anti-Vietnam protests. One day, the elder Sulzberger asked his son what Pinch calls, "the dumbest question I've ever heard in my life." If an American soldier runs into a North Vietnamese soldier, which would you like to see get shot? Young Arthur answered, "I would want to see the American get shot. It's the other guy's country." Some Sixties activists have since thought better of their early enthusiasms. Pinch hasn't.”
Mike
Wallace:
“…on an edition of the PBS panel series Ethics in America, devoted to war coverage, which was taped at Harvard in late 1987, Mike Wallace proclaimed that if he were traveling with enemy soldiers he would not warn U.S. soldiers of an impending ambush. “Don't you have a higher duty as an American citizen to do all you can to save the lives of soldiers rather than this journalistic ethic of reporting fact?", moderator Charles Ogletree Jr. suggested. Without hesitating, Wallace responded: "No, you don't have higher duty...you're a reporter." When Brent Scrowcroft, the then-future National Security Adviser, argued that "you're Americans first, and you're journalists second," Wallace was mystified by the concept, wondering "what in the world is wrong with photographing this attack by [the imaginary] North Kosanese on American soldiers?”
Just wonderful... I guess it is OK when
you belong to the high-priesthood.
Posted: Sun - July 16, 2006 at 12:29 PM