Bush's Pee Note Explained


There is a simple explanation for this stupid issue....

OK folks, There is a simple explanation for this stupid irrelevant issue.

BUSH DIDN'T WRITE THE NOTE!

Alright conspiracy fans, lets settle down for a little simple 'Analysis 101'.

Reuters gives us a photo with the caption:
"U.S. President George W. Bush writes a note to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during a Security Council meeting at the 2005 World Summit..."


As is obvious, the hand (Bush's? I guess we have to take Reuter's word on it) is writing the bottom part of the note, which has different handwriting than the top part of the note.

It looks as if the hand is writing "Is this possible...." Not that the "I" is cursive and different from the block "I" at the top of the note.

To see what Bush's handwriting looks like, take a look at these two examples.

Bush's handwriting is obviously the cursive we see at the bottom, and not the block lettering at the top, which essentially says "I have to pee!". Note how he writes his capital "I"s, and compare them to the note.

So what can we conclude from our little bit of analysis class? Bueller? Bueller?

We can conclude that Bush did not write the part of the note that asks for a bathroom break, and based on the caption, we would have to include that it was in fact written by Condi. So all you lib pundit wannabes who are having fun with the President's alleged lack of bladder control....you can put a sock in it.

Everyone comprende?

Class dismissed.

UPDATE: Kudos to Dougie Pundit who beat me to the punch last Thursday, and has more detail in an eerily similar blog entry. But I swear that I didn't read his until after I Backtracked mine on Indepundit and saw his. Great minds think alike I guess.

Posted: Mon - September 19, 2005 at 07:20 PM          

©