Sun - September 11, 2005

An ad guy gets the spleen


And Print Magazine sells it as a "Design Manifesto"


It hurts to say this, but here I go: Print Magazine disappoints me more and more. After the redesign that downgraded its status, this time I'm in shock while reading — I take that back — while looking at First Person: Design Manifesto 'A debriefing, a creed, and analysis incorporating brands, lies, exploitation, and love' by Michael Ian Kaye (page 62, issue July/August 2005).

I BELIEVE [...] THAT A GOOD DESIGN IS NOT ENOUGH. THAT A GREAT DESIGN IS NOT ENOUGH. THAT ANY DAY, ANYWHERE SOMEONE MIGHT BE HAVING A STROKE OF CREATIVE GENIUS AND THAT PERSON CAN ONLY BE SOMEONE WHO WANTS TO HAVE IT. THAT GOOD IDEAS ARE COMMON. THAT THE ABILITY TO KERN AND UNDERSTAND LETTERSPACING IMPACTS THAT INDIVIDUAL'S PERSPECTIVE ON HOW HE OR SHE EXISTS IN SPACE AND TIME. [...]

and

[...] I BELIEVE THAT AMAZING DESIGN SHOULD MAKE YOU CRY. THAT BEING CAUGHT UP IN A DESIGN IS A SELFLESS ACT, I MEAN AN OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE WHERBY AN INDIVIDUAL CAN COMPLETELY DETACH FROM EGO AND LOSE ONESELF IN SPACE AND IDEAS. I BELIVE THAT THERE ARE ORIGINAL IDEAS. I BELIVE THAT I SUCK AND I AM BARELY WORTHY. I BELIVE THAT I HAVE A UNIQUE POINT OF VIEW HOWEVER TWISTED IT MIGHT GET. THAT TO DESIGN IS TO EXPRESS FEAR. [...]

And so on, and so forth. What is this? A long poem set in upper case, followed by a long tirade against brands and marketing in the form of few pages mocking corporate ID books, brand values, brand positioning perceptual maps, brand communication and finally a few lists of brand consultancies with a gloomy "THE END IS NEAR" in overprinted black capitals. It seems like a distasteful joke, only it's not. Can this be really published in Print, the magazine of/for graphic designers? Let me quickly throw in some bullets pointing out why I think this is so off-limits:

· Print Magazine itself is a brand (only recently refreshed). Bashing brands and branding may turn against the pages that host the article;
· The issue is full of advertising to the brim. Bashing brands may offend the advertisers — people and organizations that make the magazine's existence possible;
· Some of its paying readers / subscribers are marketers or designers working in branding (like myself) or advertising and the article may offend them as well;
· Although pompously baptised as 'manifesto,' the piece seems to me poorly written and badly designed;
· "Design is love" may sound pretty but it's only hot air;
· Naomy Klein and Adbusters are out of fashion;

Can this be the same Michael Ian Kaye I googled to this Speak Up comment?

Michael Ian Kaye is a senior creative director at AR, an advertising agency whose clients include Versace, Dolce and Gabana and Calvin Klein. Prior to that, Kaye was creative director in Ogilvy & Mather’s Brand Integration Group.

If he is, than building brands is what he's doing for a living. I don't get it, is this some kind of twisted humor, a public confession (rows of "Lies" set in different typefaces and sizes) or a weird kind of public professional self-immolation ("THE END IS NEAR")?



Let me summarize: in an issue dedicated to sustainability, Print publishes a design 'manifesto' that attacks the magazine, the clients, the fellow designers and marketers under the "Design is love" mantra. Now that's sustainability, bravo!

Sadly, in spite of a few good articles (including the memorable Right Stuff by Rick Poinor, about design ethics) Print Magazine disappoints me again. This is a subscription I won't renew, I suppose.

Posted Sun - September 11, 2005 at 01:21 PM
Back to | | Feedback: |
Read posts: |



Copyright © 2004 Cristian Paul.

Creative Commons License