|
Prometheus
might have invented the combining of letters for
the benefit of mankind (as Aeschylus makes him
affirm), but not so much for loving them as from
the revulsion he felt before the new ruler of
Heaven. For
Prometheus, being himself a divinity of a certain kind, could not have ignored how promptly mankind should put his gift at the service of fraud, slander or treachery, employing it besides in writing manuals which facilitate the occurrence of misfortunes and destructions of all kinds. It is true that he also gave them the useful fire, but they would rather cook each other with it than burn the evil manuals. Now if he could not have ignored all that, then his own wit must have been flawed ... And so that capacity for reason which he is said to have given mankind must be as faulty as his own, since nobody could ever teach a better reason than the one he possesses.
If we instead turn to the logographer Herodotus,
"the father of history", we learn (5.58.1) that it
was Cadmus who
introduced the alphabet in Hellas when he came with
his contingent of Phoenicians. The Greeks then
adopted the Phoenician letters, and although a
later time changed the form of the signs, the
Greeks still called the characters "Phoenician",
which wasas Herodotus acknowledges"quite fair" since the
Phoenicians had brought them into Hellas. Who had
given the letters to them? The author does not
tell. But modern scholarship might be said to
support the core of his account. For example, the
Oxford
Classical Dictionary :
"The various
forms of local alphabet current in early Greece
were all ultimately derived from a Phoenician
(Semitic) source, which must have reached the
Aegean in the course of trade certainly by the
second half of the eigth century ..."
(sub voce ALPHABET).
Now the mythographer Hyginus says
(Fabulae
277), by way of introduction, that the
MOERAE invented seven
Greek letters (of which only six are visible in his
text): alpha, beta, eta, tau, iota, and upsilon.
Then he refers to other sources which claim that
Mercury (Hermes)
conceived the letters by observing the flight of
cranes which form letters when they fly. Then says
Hyginus that
Palamedes invented
eleven letters, Simonides four (omega, epsilon,
zeta, and phi), and Epicharmus of Sicily two (pi,
and psi). He says further that
Cadmus took the
letters which he introduced in Hellas from Egypt,
where Hermes had
brought them.
However, according to Isidore of Seville
(The
Etymologies I.iii.4-6), the Egyptian
letters were devised by Isis
(Io) when she came from
Hellas into Egypt.
Cadmus, he says,
brought to Hellas seventeen letters (alpha, beta,
gamma, delta, epsilon, zeta, iota, kappa, lambda,
mu, nu, omicron, pi, rho, sigma, tau, and phi).
Later Palamedes
added three more (eta, chi, and omega), and the
lyricist Simonides three others (psi, xi, and
theta).
With the combining of letters it is possible, as
we learn from
Prometheus, "to hold all things in
memory". Also Herodotus writes his treatise
"... in the hope of ...
preserving from decay the remembrance of what men
have done ..." (1.1.) For Herodotus memory
could be collective and external. But for Plato
memory is individual and therefore internal, as
shown by the controverse in his
Phaedrus
where he represents the god Thamus, ruler of Egypt,
saying to the inventor of writing, the god Theuth:
"This
invention will produce forgetfulness in the minds
of those who learn to use it, because they will not
practice their memory. Their trust in writing,
produced by external characters which are no part
of themselves, will discourage the use of their own
memory within them. You have invented an elixir not
of memory, but of reminding; and you offer your
pupils the appearance of wisdom, not true wisdom,
for they will read many things without instruction
and will therefore seem to know many things, when
they are for the most part ignorant and hard to get
along with, since they are not wise, but only
appear wise." (Socrates tells the story in Plato's Phaedrus 275b).
Concerning the date of the transfer of the
Semitic (Phoenician) alphabet to Greece, it appears
that most scholars agree in the earlier part of the
8th Century. But this view is not held by
near-eastern scholars, particularly Joseph Naveh
who has argued (AJA lxxvii, 1973, and
Early History of the Alphabet) for an earlier transferat c. 1050 BCbeing supported by Frank M. Cross (Semitic epigrapher at Harvard), and others. These scholars do not accept the argument ex silentio (that no Greek
alphabetic texts from before c. 740 have been
found), and build their case on the "forms" and
"names used for the letters" (so A. W. Johnston's
"Supplement" (1990) in The Local Scripts of
Archaic Greece, by L. H. Jeffery, 1961/2001).
If the Greek tradition (that
Cadmus and his
Phoenicians introduced the alphabet in Hellas) were
accepted as a true account, then the date of the
transmission of the alphabet would have to be
placed between 1400 and 1500 BC (when
Cadmus is thought to
have lived). That would imply acknowledging that
the two forms of writingLinear B and the
Greek alphabetcoexisted during a certain time
until Linear B disappeared along with the
Mycenaeans.
|