"Death and destruction have been the fate of San Francisco. Shaken by a temblor at 5:13 o'clock yesterday morning, the shock lasting 48 seconds, and scourged by flames that raged diametrically in all directions, the city is a mass of smouldering ruins. At six o'clock last evening the flames seemingly playing with increased vigor, threatened to destroy such sections as their fury had spared during the earlier portion of the day. Building their path in a triangular circuit from the start in the early morning, they jockeyed as the day waned, left the business section, which they had entirely devastated, and skipped in a dozen directions to the residence portions. As night fell they had made their way over into the North Beach section and springing anew to the south they reached out along the shipping section down the bay shore, over the hills and across toward Third and Townsend streets.

           "Warehouses, wholesale houses and manufacturing concerns fell in their path. This completed the destruction of the entire district known as the 'South of Market Street.' How far they are reaching to the south across the channel cannot be told as this part of the city is shut off from San Francisco papers. After darkness, thousands of the homeless were making their way with their blankets and scant provisions to Golden Gate Park and the beach to find shelter.

           "Those in the homes on the hills just north of the Hayes Valley wrecked section piled their belongings in the streets and express wagons and automobiles were hauling the things away to the sparsely settled sections. Everybody in San Francisco is prepared to leave the city, for the belief is firm that San Francisco will be totally destroyed. Downtown everything is ruin. Not a business house stands. Theaters are crumbled into heaps. Factories and commission houses lie smouldering on their former sites."

            So spoke the front page of the San Francisco 'Call Chronicle Examiner" on the morning of April 19,1906, though of course the newspaper had to be printed on still intact presses far away from the city. This was a real earthquake, ladies and gentlemen, a real  earthquake. And though it measured a relatively puny 7.9 on the Richter Scale, the savage transverse shear waves generated by the quake whipped through the ground like a monstrous snake, causing severe damage to buildings in Portland, Oregon, more than 530 miles away from its epicenter in San Francisco. Six minutes later there was a severe aftershock, and then another severe aftershock five minutes after that.

            San Francisco was shattered, and awestruck scientists from all over America gathered to gawk helplessly at the geological damage. The ground had broken open for more than 270 miles along the San Andreas rift, a major fault line. The country on the east side of the rift had moved southward relative to the country on the west side of the rift. The greatest movement was about 21 feet, some 30 miles northwest of San Francisco.

             Were it not for a handful of amateur cameramen in Banda Aceh on Boxing Day 2004, we might easily have been fooled into believing that Sumatra, like San Francisco, had been subjected to a naturally-occurring nightmare earthquake, first peddled by the American NOAA at 8.0 on the Richter Scale. Then of course the NOAA realized that 8.0 was simply not enough to cover this thermonuclear sabotage, and developed a new exciting "flexible" Richter Scale to take care of the public relations problem.

             Onwards and upwards the NOAA went, from 8.5 to 8.9, and then from 9.0 to 9.1. Finally they managed to convert the single Padang seismic compression spike (shown for the first time on the next page) into a whopping great Richter 9.3, sufficient they thought to cover the destruction of the cooling pipes of India's Chennai nuclear reactor in the southern state of Tamil Nadu. The reactor should have been perfectly safe of course, because the Bay of Bengal has never before experienced a tsunami in recorded history.

            Possible motives for this massive war crime were touched on briefly in Part One of this report, with the nuclear reactor at Kalpakkam, 80 kilometers from Chenna, the most likely target. If this particular reactor had cracked open like Chernobyl, the results would have been so catastrophic that the new Russia-China-India-Brazil coalition, a clear and present danger to Wall Street, would have been neutered. It is not hard to imagine the glee on the faces of members of the World Bank and IMF, as India crawled in humbly on its belly asking for a huge loan.

            Although the Kalpakkam facility escaped major damage, it was a very close call, with 30 atomic scientists and technicians killed at the plant's nearby residential complex. And if the thermonuclear weapon placed in the Sumatran Trench had been more powerful, Wall Street might easily have scored a double whammy. A bigger Russian-aided nuclear power complex that uses sea water for cooling is coming up fast at Koodankulam, 900 km south of Chennai and close to Kanyakumari, the southernmost tip of the Indian peninsula that was severely devastated by the (unique artificial) tsunami, that in some places reached 35 feet in height.

            Now try to imagine South Asia if both nuclear plants had (1) gone critical or (2) cracked, or (3) a horrific combination of both. All of this nuclear hardware comes from Russia, the same country that (accidentally) brought us Chernobyl, then sold lethal unstoppable 'Sunburn' missiles to China, Iran, Syria and Venezuela, and probably played a major role in the attack on the World Trade Center during 2001.

             The possibilities for Wall Street would have been endless. While India was beating down the door of the IMF frantically begging for a giant loan, Wall Street's faithful servants at the UN and IAEA would be tasked with badmouthing and banning Russian nuclear technology around the world -  including Iran and North Korea of course. Thus from a position of bankrupcy brought about by the insane invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, Wall Street would be up and running again, and 'One World Government' would still be within reach. Hurrah!

            Of course, all of these claims are speculative conspiracies at this stage, despite the fact that today the price of oil scratched US$52 per barrel, and the American dollar fell like a stone against the Euro, neither of which would have happened if the tsunami war crime had been successful. Theoretically, all we need do now in order to force the FBI to investigate and execute the perpetrators on Wall Street, is prove scientifically that the tsunami was NOT a natural event, which is what this report is really all about.

             

            The biggest danger to the wannabee 'New World Order' was unquestionably those wretched amateur video tapes from Banda Aceh, which simply could not be explained away by captive media 'experts', because no one was sure how many amateur tapes existed in total. Put another way, if they tried to suppress the video clips, what would happen if an unknown 'flyer' suddenly appeared months later and completely trashed the western world's most eminent 'earthquake experts'?

            Predictably the media did the next best thing and 'blended' the different clips together, in an attempt to create the false illusion of an extended (and thus 'real') earthquake like San Francisco, or other real earthquakes, like the incredibly puny 5.5 quake near Japan's Bonin Islands on September 20, 2003. Puny though this real earthquake was, its magnitude 5.5  transverse shear shock waves were still strong enough to bring down temple walls in Tokyo, more than 540 miles away from the Bonin epicenter.

            In basic terms the BBC editors "mixed 'n matched" different frames from different clips, placed  them out of sequence, and also ran two clips from two different cameras filming the same tremor - one after the other. This particular trick made the 'earthquake' appear to last twice as long, i.e. 26 seconds. In the silky words of the smooth BBC narrator, "and the quake rumbles on..." though of course it did not.

            Those readers who choose to play the entire 2.2 minute BBC propaganda piece on the next page, will also notice that shots filmed after the tsunami started to come ashore, have been shifted further forward (towards the beginning) of the film sequence, thereby creating the twin illusions of aftershocks and property damage caused by the 'earthquake', when in reality there were no aftershocks and no property damage until D + 22.1 minutes, at which point in time the orchestrated tsunami wiped them off the face of the earth.  

 

ca

 

that in  

            Next up was the problem of making the world believe that two of the world's great tectonic plates had collided and "reared up", thereby displacing the water required to make up the giant tidal wave that raced across the Indian Ocean, bowling over everything that got in its path. Believe me, this was and is an impossible task, because there is no way geologically that they could do so. The only fault line capable of enormous spontaneous upthrust (and therefore water displacement) is known as a "Divergent Faultline", shown on the Rutger's map below in red. Basically this means that the tectonic plates pull apart (diverge) from each other to enable new magna to thrust up through the middle. Fine, heaps of displaced water and really big bouncy tsunamis. The giant Alaskan earthquake caused an equally giant tsunami because of the divergent fault you can see on the map.

             The San Andreas fault falls into a second class called a "Transform Fault", where the two tectonic plates simply grind alongside each other, colored pink on the map. This causes massive property damage from the vibrations (as in the San Francisco Earthquake), but no water displacement. Remember, to generate a tsunami, or even a mere ripple, the water must first be displaced by other matter. This is basic stuff outlined in Archimedes Principle, so no need to delve any deeper here.

             Lastly we come back to the 'fake quake' of 26 December 2004, which allegedly occurred on the third class of fault known as a "Convergent Faultline", colored black on the map, where one tectonic plate slides (converges) very slowly under another, which in this case means the Indo-Australian plate sliding steadily eastwards underneath the Eurasian plate. But as in the case of the Transforn Fault, movement is  horizontal, displacing no appreciable quantities of water.