SPRAYING THE SKIES:
An Article With No Defense
By Carole Pellatt
I’m writing this article for a few reasons. The first and most obvious reason is that I
haven’t published a photo essay in over a year. Due to this fact, I have received
many enquiries from people who frequent my website as to my reasons for
seemingly falling off the radar. I feel that a lot of people have counted on my voice
to speak honestly regarding the issue of spraying by airplanes, and I want to
assure them that I haven’t changed my position or hypothesis one iota.
Another reason for this article is that over the years I have been careful and
responsible in publishing research to back up any claims or accusations I’ve made
with numerous sources of indisputable factoids ie; published scientific research
papers, military reports, government oversight reports, facts dredged up during
lawsuits, etc. This was done because that’s how all good research is published,
and I wanted to give the benefit of the doubt to all my readers that they earnestly
were seeking to get to the bottom of this.
It seems that in this day and age of “cut and paste” arguing and publishing, and the
complete breach of the internet as a place to acquire free information, my
corroborating evidence has been ignored by many people who inevitably accuse
me of being a “kook”, “conspiracy theorist”, and just plain stupid. Apparently, many
of the people who dogpile onto the “chemtrail” debate are merely sharks trolling the
internet seeking their next engagement of anonymous aggression. These people
are self proclaimed “experts”. Proclaimed so because they can win arguments from
the bully pulpit of an internet forum hiding behind an anonymous name.
These being the facts of my own experience, I decided to write an article that
breaks all the rules of a good researcher: I’m going to address the many enquiries
as to what I am currently doing in regards to the spraying and what I think the
spraying is all about. But this time I will discuss what my gut feelings are and what
my instincts tell me regarding what is going on in the sky. And I’m not going to back
it up with any evidence. All my claims can be substantiated with a little research,
which is how I came to these conclusions. As my guitar teacher Joe used to tell me
about learning to play, “No one can do it for you.” The facts of my research are
indisputable and easy to find, so you don’t need my help for that.
SAME AS IT EVER WAS
One of my major concerns during this publishing hiatus has been people who need
guidance, corroborating evidence, a hypothesis, or serious background information
on dangerous, damaging, and proven lethal government, corporate, and military
programs. I encourage you to read my article “CONNECTIONS, Yes We Are Being
Sprayed.” This paper represents hundreds of hours of research from scores of
sources that are independent from one another. There you will find all the defense,
and corroborating evidence for my “outrageous” claims. I stand by the conclusions I
reached after the years of exhaustive research that went into that article. Please
use the link provided or one linked from my website to access "Yes We Are Being
Sprayed", as this article has been plagiarized on the internet and the wording
changed. This includes sites like "Educate Yourself", who refuse after 2
communications to use my original words. The version currently being "cut and
pasted" around the internet had been edited by the Idaho Observer and the end
product did not represent my feelings, words, or intentions. I hold no malice
towards them for interpreting my words to represent their feelings, but what came
out at the other end was a shock to me.
As well, I did a short film called "WHO ARE YOU" which is bursting with my photos
of aerial assaults, obvious examples of weather modification, and the movement of
barium clouds by electro-magnetic waves. One complaint my detractors had was
how quickly the written information passed. For all their "tech savvy" on internet
forums, it's too bad they don't know how to use the pause button on "youtube".
Good people who have supported me over the years, I am still here. Mostly
researching. And also checking that what I wrote in the article, “Connections”,
stands the test of time. I do not need to keep publishing the same conclusions over
and over again.
I also have spent countless hours updating my I SEE LINES website. To aid in
research, I have updated the "downloadable reports" page. The links were
constantly being compromised by the Mac server and I apologize for any
inconvenience it caused. All reports should be easily accessed now.
LET'S DISCUSS THE WORD "NORMAL"
There are a few reasons why I haven't published new photo essays. One thing is
that I was starting to feel like I was publishing the same photos over and over
again. There are over 50 photo essays on my site www.iseelines ( I SEE LINES ).
If I see something new, I will publish it. But we are well into the scientific programs
that involve spraying the globe with metallic based aerosol conductors. And, over
the period of 50 or so photo essays featuring hundreds of photos, I think I’ve
covered the different faces of our fake sky. I encourage you to go back to these
photo essays, TODAY'S WEATHER, and read them. And please continue to share
them. They are as relevant today as when I first published them.
Another thing I noticed about my photos over time is that they no longer seemed
"horrible" to the general public. They looked "normal", or even, routine.
There was a window of time when it went from sporadic-although regular spraying
of the sky for more decades than most people realize, to full blown checker-board,
plaid, and mostly horrifying spraying patterns. That was before the situation
became normalized after so many years, so many tv shows, films, commercials,
ads, weather channel graphics, news station graphics, credit card graphics and talk
show set designs. These images featured new patterns that were merely there
when new media was being created. However, there is a legitimate question as to
whether or not there had been a backstage machination within the media to rush
these images along. This type of "power of suggestion" propaganda is not a new
tool of civilization.
Now, our fake sky is a normal sight. These patterns have been burned into the right
hemispheres of those who have grown up with a different memory of the sky. Some
people notice and don't care, some people never see it. And a whole new
generation of children has grown up seeing lines and "X"'s being sprayed,
completely unnatural cloud formations, pollution, and unnatural weather patterns
that they perceive as "normal" cycles of the earth they live upon. Just as every
generation obliviously inherited a landscape that was more damaged and less
organic than it's predecessor's. It’s everywhere, and my photos merely depict what
the new “normal” is.
I must qualify at this point, that when I use the term “normal” to describe the sky,
that doesn’t mean it’s okay. The term "water pollution" is “normalized”, but it’s not
okay with me. Just as water privatization is considered a "normal business
practice", it's not okay with me. Air pollution is a “normal sight,” but it horrifies me.
Clear cutting old growth forests is “normally practiced”, but it’s not okay with me. Oil
spills are a “normal occurrence”, but they’re not okay with me. I'm sure every living
creature that is not human would agree with my gut instincts on this.
And if we add humans to this train of thought; Banks stealing money from
hardworking people is “normal” but it’s not okay with me, nor is homelessness, or
poverty by design, racism, perpetual war, refugee-ism or slavery. Nothing is as it
seems and "normal" is further and further from the kind milk of mother nature every
day.
BACK TO THE SKY
Well, is the sky "normal", or is it a "conspiracy of normalcy"? Unfortunately, I feel
that what we are currently witnessing is the new "normal". The tragedy of the rape
of our sky could only be considered a "conspiracy" or "conspiracy theory" if the
facts, the reports, the books, the patents, the statistics, the profitable industries,
and the scientific papers describing these occurrences and practices were kept a
big "secret". But they're not. There are literally thousands upon thousands of
papers, books, and articles on weather modification and other actions that span
more than a century.
There is an endless supply of legitimate information on experiments, research,
events, practices, drills, and occurrences of anomalies such as military chaff, man-
made aerosols, liquid droplets, vapors, gasses, electromagnetic waves, lethal
frequencies-both audible and inaudible, weather modification-both extreme and
benign, poisonous chemicals and biological agents that have been created in labs
and strewn about the earth, in bodies of water, in clouds, in the troposphere, the
stratosphere, the mesosphere, and the atmosphere. These toxic mimics have been
harvested, injected, propelled, detonated, leaked, beamed, spilled, and sprayed
into our environment. We've eaten them, and they have eaten us.
You could spend a lifetime reading technical papers on heinous crimes against
man and nature. This should put to rest any discussion of conspiracy theories. And
it should remind us that anyone who uses this expression is merely displaying an
abysmal ignorance of reality.
YOU CALL IT CHEMTRAILS, HE CALLS IT CONTRAILS,
Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off
Let’s discuss a few of the arguments regarding what people call chemtrails. First of
all, I do my best to never call them “chemtrails”. I hold no resentment for those that
do, but I choose my words differently. For many reasons. The first being, that I
don’t see them referred to as “chemtrails” in the scientific papers I have read. Yes, I
know about Dennis Kucinich’s bill HR2977 where “chemtrails” are mentioned as an
exotic weapon.
But there are some problems associated with using a word that is connected to
such a phrase; exotic weapon. It negates the implications of it's current uses on a
daily basis as a missile guidance system, military communications superhighway,
radar jammer, the finest tuned internet and international communications satelite
destroyer, delivery system of lightning storms, wind storms, sand storms, biological
weapons, and perfect plane of existence for launching nuclear weapons over a
curved earth with excellent accuracy. That is only to name a few of the current uses
of this "spray". You see, when you say to someone “Look, there’s this scary new
weapon technology called chemtrails, and it’s a huge plot to spray the sky all over
the world.", you're being a little vague. Using a word that was created decades and
decades after the government started spraying the skies with military chaff and
silver iodide-to name a couple of aerosol conductors- expresses an ignorance of
the history of aerosol and metal particulate spraying. These multipurpose
technologies allow us to create a "plasma shield" around the earth and dominate
the new electromagnetic superhighway created in the sky. Basically, the cold war
has migrated into space.
“Chemtrails” may have shown up in a Senator’s bill, but the spraying of the skies,
or the injecting of aerosols and particulates known and unknown into the
atmosphere predates World War I. It’s also important to remember that the
potential for weather modification has been investigated and practiced by ancient
peoples, from indigenous tribes to the Egyptians and ancient Greeks.
Next, I never enter into those inane arguments centered around “contrail science”.
People who have never read a lick of a science report in their lives are now quoting
what temperature the ionosphere has to be in order for "contrails" to be created by
aircraft. This is the explanation for their denial. If someone cuts and pastes that
argument to me one more time I'll scream. It's astounding to me that you can
"know" that much about physics, yet still be completely oblivious to the current
standards of modern science and technology. If people want to argue that the
portrait of horror up in the sky is merely aircraft contrails, so be it. Contrails; toxic,
engineered, succinctly sprayed, contrails. End of argument. After all, it did begin
with "contrail" studies. Really, call them what you want, they're toxic to life on earth.
And why is it that these junior scientists can never explain to me-or even attempt to
explain how clouds can fill the sky in the desert when the humidity is 6%? And how
is it that they can suddenly appear and then mysteriously vaporize?
"Chemtrails", "Contrails", let's call the whole thing off....
Another issue brought up by apologists is the accusation that “some kook is
making outrageous claims that all over the world, there is a synchronized
conspiracy of hundreds of jets spraying every day.” “How can there be such a huge
conspiracy and yet no one knows about it?”, they ask, sarcastically. Start reading
military documentation and you’ll see that it’s not a secret. You’ll see that every
military that has planes, sprays the skies. If it’s not a secret, it’s not a conspiracy.
They claim it’s for “military exercises”, but basically, that’s become a code for “it’s
there all the time”. That’s where our technology is. That’s where the war is being
fought. If one country has the technology, eventually every other country will have
it. And people from all over the world are seeing these spray patterns. They're not
going unnoticed by the public.
Need I mention how many American Military bases exist world-wide, and how
many allied bases exist worldwide? Now let’s add the non-allied nations who also
have the technology because they have airplanes. Do I have to go on? Wherever
there are military planes and radar there is spraying. So you don’t need one
centralized evil force involved in a huge world-wide conspiracy. You just need
militaries with planes and the same high tech weapons technology and/or the
potential for exploration and experimentation. No defense. Do the research.
Also, I will have to pass on the altruistic notion that geo-engineers just love us and
the earth so much that they are trying to combat "global warming" with this spray
around the earth to protect us from the sun's harmful UV rays. The concept is akin
to putting out a forest fire with oil. This theory and this practice may be a by-product
of high tech plasma experimentation, but it is only a small component of the
playground above the earth, and one of the latter experiments-if we look at this
theory in light of the early contrail experiments of the 1940's.
So, before we even talk about what is "global warming", can we please admit to the
scores of decades of weather modification, industrial pollution, corporate rape of
the environment, nuclear explosions-above ground, below ground, under water,
and in space? Can we admit to the almost complete destruction of the world's
forests-the climate regulators, and the construction of excessive numbers of
calamitous dams that have crippled the eco-system's circulatory system? Perhaps
before we have a debate about whether "global warming" exists and who is to
blame, we can acknowledge our consumer and profit driven lifestyle that
promulgates a complete lack of respect for all living organisms and their
reproductive and migratory needs. If we open our eyes, maybe we can see all the
damage that pavement and cement cause to natural environments.
Then, we can talk about the heat....
HOW DO WE LOOK AT THIS?
For those of you who merely look up, and don’t notice anything, or never look up,
and therefore have no point of reference regarding a real sky-one that exists free of
man’s intervention-you are blind and ignorant. And if you choose to look upon
those that do see the sky for what it is and ridicule them, I accuse you of criminal
negligence. Your ignorance gives tacit collusion to all that you refuse to see is
wrong. You are part of the problem. No defense. It’s that simple. How do you argue
with someone like that? You don’t.
There's no way to change a world that we are oblivious to. Ignorance keeps us
believing that we have no power to change anything. Convenient fairy tale.
And for those of you who haven't the time or the interest to research what is going
on in the world around you, please stop asking, "Why are they spraying?".
Whether we are talking about "chemtrails", or any other legitimate concern that
elicits anger, accusations, and overtly contemptible reactions from the mainstream,
it is important to remember that the issue remains not one of "conspiracy", but one
of "truth". And in research, truth is often proven with patterns and connections.
One of the most disturbing patterns that has manifested itself to me in 20 years of
researching scores of topics from thousands of sources, is the deeply convoluted
and profoundly corrupt relationships that exist between institutions that we were
taught to hold in high esteem. Ironically, these patterns of collusion, criminal
activity, mutual support, protectionism and conniving, exist in contradiction to the
public images that these institutions proudly flaunt. Ironically, their actions display
tragic and humiliating conflicts of interest that well exceed the standard of criminal
and malicious behavior.
In order to truly begin to understand what is going on in the sky, it helps if you have
a clue about the relationships that exist between multinational corporations, the
military, politicians, lobbyists, local governments, universities, university deans,
research laboratories-both publicly and privately funded, the mass media, public
relations firms, law enforcement agencies, private contractors, banks, philanthropic
organizations, NGO's, statisticians, and other institutions that we were taught had
been established to protect us from the evil out there.
For example, in regards to weather modification, aerosol programs (including
chemtrails), electromagnetic experimentation and sonar experimentation-to name a
few-this is not a conspiracy of a small group of people trying to hide the facts of
their dangerous little foray into science. The white elephant in the room is the
blurry, gloating, overfed, budgetary and technological lines of collusion that exist
between NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration), who is
also NWS (The National Weather Service), whose front is the Weather Channel
( public access goes Hollywood bad ), who is the shill for NASA (National
Atmospheric and Space Administration), who is also HAARP (High Frequency
Active Auroral Research Program), who is the darling of the military industrial
complex, who happen also to be the defense contractors, who are also the
pharmaceutical monoliths, who is the pesticide industry, who are also the biotech
giants, and the energy corporations, who are all propped up, financed, and spoon-
fed by the very "politicians" that people vote into office to advocate for their needs
and their quality of life. Keep following the poisons down the chain, you will see
your dollars at work.
LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE-It's Worse Than You Thought
So everyone is "researching" on the internet. We're all learning that our lives are
laced with thousands of horrible involuntary chemicals. We're looking at air, soil,
and water samples, and seeing dangerously high levels of barium, strontium, silver,
cadmium, manganese and aluminum. It's a varitable toxic cocktail of heavy metals,
VOC's, and PCB's. For those who have been sleeping all your lives, the sudden
knowledge of chemtrails coinciding with their new knowledge of our shiny
phosphorescent drinking water and metal-laced air, there is only one conclusion:
CHEMTRAILS. "Maybe it's depopulation, maybe it's germ warfare." Those darn
chemtrails are killing us. If not for chemtrails we could be happy-go-lucky once
again, like the good old days before the spraying and deception.
But in reality, we are dying the death of a thousand cuts. This is not the first rape of
the Nile.
For those of us who from the time we were children, could never accept the fact
that there was water we couldn't drink or swim in, this depressing slap in the face is
nothing new. We grew up seeing schools of dead fish, toxic smoke billowing from
smokestacks, breathing exhaust, overdosing on freon and smelling rotting water.
We played in the woods, only to see every inch of natural life paved over for cookie
cutter houses and strip malls. We were taught by authorities that this was called
"progress". "Progress" was programmed to mean "good for us".
For those of us who have seen clearcuts, mountain-top removal, oil in the Amazon,
and for those of us who know that every community in North America sits upon
toxic plumes of groundwater, this affront to the sky is no surprise. Many of the
chemicals we find in our food, soil, air, water, and bodies belong to the spray from
jets, but they also belong to every microchip maker, mining company, natural gas
company, oil company, nuclear power plant, landfill, defense contractor, factory, dry
cleaner, and every military base, to name a few. You need only read some
"Superfund" reports to get to know the criminals in your neigborhood.
"Chemtrails" are not ruining our lives. Blinders are ruining our lives. This is not just
about the spraying of the sky. It's about civilization's aversion to reality. It's about
our deeply programmed, "business as usual" demeanor in the face of the
domination of our natural domain. We are taught to be obedient as we are
deliberately displaced and isolated from the natural world. As a society, we are
passively witnessing the re-setting of our eco-system rhythms, while all life
sustaining systems are hijacked by those in power who feel "entitled" to ownership
and control of them. Once nature's miracles are stolen, harnessed, "dominated",
legislated, domesticated, privatized, patented, fenced off, and completely exploited,
the ruins are sold back to us; spoiled, rotting, toxic, overpriced, and valueless. It's a
truly psychotic transaction.
Ignorance May Be Bliss, but KNOWLEDGE IS POWER
Okay, so we can lay down and feel powerless, overwhelmed and depressed. Yes,
that can be a reasonable reaction. We can bury ourselves on our computers,
distract ourselves with our electronic toys, anesthetize ourselves by staring at
screens of fantasy worlds all day and night. We can self-medicate our way out of
this predicament of reality. Or we can look the other way and focus on our next big
purchase. After all, we work so hard, we've earned the right to "veg" when we are
not serving our relentless, faceless master with every ounce of energy we can
muster up. I could never grasp the phrase "ignorance is bliss", because blindness
incapacitates the spirit.
Reading will help you to understand the materialization of events, of anomalies
created by mankind, and deeds that are completely foreign to the natural world and
catastrophic to our eco-system. These "proceedings" are lethal to life on earth.
These traumatic and intrusive medelings are morally toxic and spiritually bankrupt.
They materialize regularly, and are deliberate, coordinated, and succinct.
Please start reading books. A large percentage of my research comes from books.
Another great source is documentaries. And another is personal interviews. Get to
know people with knowledge that you want. That may even be your next door
neighbor. Get to know the smaller yet legitimate sources of independent news. The
internet can be a great research tool, but it only does certain things well. I really
use the internet for reference purposes. Almost as a librarian would. I can use it to
learn what I'd like to read next, which author or scientist, or documentary I want to
study next. I can use it to see where a particular person may be giving a lecture. I
can use the internet to cross reference concepts I'm studying. It's also a great
instantaneous communications tool. I can also utilize it the way the government
does, to surveil what people are thinking and saying to each other about a specific
topic. But I never let the internet tell me what I should think. And for god's sake,
step away from your computer and go for a walk.
It's essential that you learn to cross reference your facts from independent sources,
from all countries, and all political leanings. But most importantly, you must get out
there in the world and seek your knowledge. You must walk in your neighborhood.
You must walk in natural areas. You MUST speak with indigenous people, you
must speak with researchers, you must speak with the elderly-they can answer a
lot of questions about skies and weather. And start speaking to homeless people.
They possess a very high awareness of natural and unnatural patterns in our
society.
Now, how did I get so far away from "chemtrails"? I didn't. What we choose to see
every day is based on how much reality we feel we can handle. This should give
you some insight as to why some people can look up at the sky and see nothing
wrong.
Nature continues to teach us every day that we can rise to our highest potential as
humans when we are connected to a miraculous eco-system. Remember this:
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. Knowledge is power. Don't let anyone tell you that you
can't be effective.
YES, BUT WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT
When I'm asked, "What can we do about it?", I respond internally with other
questions, "Do you mean what can be done?", "Can we ever stop it?", "Who is the
person we need to contact in order to stop this?", or, "Is there such a thing as
damage control in this situation?".
Stopping "chemtrails" or programs that spray the sky is akin to trying to stop the
way coal is mined, or the way wood is produced, animals harvested, or weapons
designed. It's like trying to change the way power,ownership, security, and
weapons of mass destruction are idolized and prioritized in our society. This simple,
innocent question of, "How do we stop the spraying?", invariably leads us to such
questions as, "How do we stop civilization from valuing humans-and only certain
groups of them-over the needs of other humans, and those of the natural world?".
How can we make those in power realize that the happiness of humans is tied
directly to the health and abundance of our eco-system?
Have you ever tried to stop a freeway from being built? A trade agreement from
being signed? Have you ever tried to save an old building from demolition? Have
you ever tried to get one homeless person off the streets and back into society?
You are now stepping onto the ruthless, treacherous, all too familiar turf that
environmentalists and activists tread upon daily. Who is an "activist" or an
"environmentalist"? Well, these people are teachers, lawyers, writers, scientists,
students, caregivers, artists, researchers, grandparents, farmers, waiters, and
anyone you may encounter on your daily walks. They are people from all walks of
life. What they have in common is a knowledge and deep understanding of the
exploitation of our earth, the pain inflicted upon it's inhabitants, and it's causes and
effects. And they are so moved by these injustices that they react to them with
action. That's what an "activist" is. Someone who cares enough to put the time and
energy into changing something that feels so wrong. So now, when someone asks
of chemtrails, "What can we do to stop them?", we must understand the machinery
from which they emanate. It is a long, merciless road to change. And one you will
have to walk alone a lot of the time. If you sincerely ask, "How can we stop them?",
you have two choices; you can become a knowledgeable activist, or you can walk
away and join the rest of civilization dancing to the fiddle as Rome burns.
LEARNING TO LEARN
A good way to learn the different methods for expressing your knowledge of the
subjects you have researched, or learning how to take direct action to change a
destructive force, is to read books by people who have done just that. There is a
great book by author/activist Derrick Jensen called, "How Shall I Live My Life?". It
discusses the destructive dominant culture with ten people who have devoted their
lives to undermining it. It is an inspiring, enlightening, collection of interviews.There
are many other beautiful, intelligent people out there who care about the earth and
it's inhabitants, and possess great scientific, historical, and practical knowledge.
They write books, create cartoons, make documentaries, build websites, or start
research groups. Some coordinate community action groups or are involved in
many other forms of direct action. Others do independent radio or tv broadcasts-for
which the internet is a very useful tool- and they help to educate others. There are
also many artists, sculptors, musicians, actors, poets and photographers who have
found beautiful and powerful ways to communicate very complex and socially
unpopular messages quite successfully. It's a delicate balance between true
knowledge and our ability to function effectively in the world. Only you can
formulate the equation between anger and inspiration.
One thing is for sure, there is no moving forward, there is no action, without
knowledge. And I will repeat myself and say, "To those of you who don’t have the
time or inclination to find out what is going on in the world, please stop asking,
"Why?". " The way I see it, there's no getting away from the destruction mankind
has wrought upon this earth. And ignoring things-especially in order to pacify the
people around us- only makes things worse.
Hopefully, you've learned a little more about what is going on up in the sky. You see
that people of all kinds can be made to open their eyes to ugly situations by using
an imaginative toolbox of approaches. We understand that this brutal education of
both us and them, is the beginning of growth and action. Action must take place all
over the globe if we are to be able create a tidal wave of opposition strong enough
to shatter the current power structure. Ultimately, if you really want to know what's
going on in your world, you're going to have to do a lot of researching, and have a
lot of conversations with people from all walks of life.
This article is linked to my website www.iseelines . There, you will find all my
downloadable reports, photos essays, video, and articles. I'm helping you start your
research off with a few of my favorite reports that do contain proof of the spraying.
If you've seen these, please click to go to I SEE LINES and you can start your
research from there.
I'd like to end this article with a quote from Ramsey Clark, who was a high ranking
government official who consistently takes the side of the oppressed. In an
interview with Derrick Jensen for Derrick's book, "Resistance Against Empire", he
said, "We have to realize that we won't be happy unless we try to do our part. And if
a small portion of us simply do our part, that will be enough. If even 1 percent of the
people of this country could break out of the invisible chains, they could bring down
this military-industrial complex-this tyranny of corporations, this plutocracy-
overnight. That's all it would take: 1 percent of the people." He continues further on,
"Any fool can be unhappy; in fact, we make whole industries out of being unhappy,
because happy people generally make lousy consumers." And at the end of the
interview, he said something I truly want to leave you with; He said that despite the
horrors they had experienced, he noticed an exceptional joy amongst the poor,
amongst indigenous peoples, the persecuted, and the victims of genocide. People
who struggle daily for their existence. He said, "They sing and dance and have fun.
They can't see life as so much drudgery. I saw that same joy among the civil rights
protesters in the 1960's. Watching them sing as they marched, I couldn't help but
realize that you feel better when you're doing something you feel is right-no matter
how hard it is."
RESEARCH MATERIALS
Linked to this page is my website which contains a research page filled with official
reports and research papers.This is where I store some of the research reports I
have read that have really helped me understand what is going on out there.
A few words about reading reports: They can seem intimidating. But words are just
words, and dictionaries and background information that provide context are easily
found with a little patience. Knowledge takes time and commitment. Start with one
sentence at a time and keep reading it until you start to understand it. You may
have to read a whole report numerous times before you begin to grasp the
concepts. That's okay. Since when are we "grown-ups" supposed to stop figuring
out how to understand things?
I have posted a few reports here that I consider to be of importance in regards to
what is going on in the sky. All of these are on the full downloadable reports page.
REPORTS: These Are A Good Place To Start
First of all if you want to download a copy of this report for easy printing,
click here: NO APOLOGIES PDF
The first item is an article I wrote called:
"Connections: Yes We Are Being Sprayed".
If you haven't read it, please do, it will provide some background on the history of
dangerous government sanctioned programs and experiments.
LINK: CONNECTIONS, YES WE ARE BEING SPRAYED
This next report is about spraying the sky. It's called:
"Intense Convective Storms with Little Or No Lightning Over Central
Arizona: A Case Of Inadvertent Weather Modification?"
It is from 1996 from the JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY.
As I said, there is so much documentation out there that the military is spraying the
sky. It's presented by researchers from NOAA (always go to the source) National
Severe Storms Laboratory in Norman Oklahoma. It's only 13 pages and it
discusses how all the chaff being sprayed from military planes (during "training
exercises") was possibly modifying the weather over Arizona. There are so many
reports like this one, so many smoking guns. When you get to the source, no one is
asking "Are they spraying the sky?", they're studying what effects the spraying is
having.
LINK: A CASE OF INADVERTENT WEATHER MODIFICATION
The next report is longer but it is another smoking gun. It's called:
"ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - DOD (Department of Defense)
Management Issues Related To Chaff
It's a report done in 1998 by the United States General Accounting Office that
discusses the impacts that the spraying of chaff is having on the environment. It
also mentions a specific case of the rediculously dense spraying of CHAFF over
Arizona and how it created false radar readings with the National Weather Service
(false radar reading is one of the purposes of CHAFF spraying during war time).
The report also mentions the potential for chaff to disrupt communications that
control air traffic. It discusses CHAFF's toxicity-and it is agreed in the report that it's
toxic, although the military experts downplay this fact. There are many other issues
related to CHAFF discussed in this report. They are of course, "chemtrail" issues.
LINK: DOD MANAGEMENT ISSUES RELATED TO CHAFF
This next report is from the INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
MONITORING AND RESEARCH. It's called:
"EXPLORING FUTURE TRAINING OPTIONS"
According to their charter, "The Institute offers scientifically supported
recommendations to the Ministers of Environment and National Defence on the
policy issues relating to the impacts of low-level flying". It's from a workshop they
gave in Goose Bay Newfoundland in 2005. Once again, this should put to rest any
doubt that toxic stew is being sprayed from airplanes.
LINK: EXPLORING FUTURE TRAINING OPTIONS
This report is amazing. It is a medical hypotheses. It was written by a
researcher named Mark Purdey. It's called:
ELEVATED SILVER, BARIUM, STRONTIUM IN ANTLERS,
VEGETATION AND SOILS SOURCED FROM CWD CLUSTER AREAS
It may take a dictionary and a bit of time to digest, but everything he writes is worth
reading. Mark Purdey was a British Organic farmer who became a researcher. He
called himself an "eco-researcher". He started studying Mad Cow disease (Bovine
Spongiform Encephalopathy), BSE. He correctly theorized that the disease was not
infectious but had environmental causes. He found elevated silver, barium, and
strontium in antlers, vegetation, and soil sourced from areas where animals
suffered from CWD (Chronic Wasting Disease). He mentions both weather
modification and military spraying as sources of the heavy metals. His theory goes
one step further; he believed that the buildup of these heavy metals in the system,
specifically the brain, collect and the piezoelectric crystals lay dormant until they
are exposed to loud noises i.e. munitions factories, military bases, airports etc. The
decibels essentially "wake up" the disease and transmit it. He traveled all over the
world taking samples from animals, soil, and vegetation and found a pattern in the
animals' diseases: weather modification spraying or military chaff, pesticides, and
high decibel noises. To oversimplify, he also felt there was the same connection to
Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. His web site is no longer accessible, but you
can still find his reports on various sites.
This report is not a quick read. But I would read everything he ever wrote. He, like
a disproportionate amount of "eco- researchers" died of a brain tumor.
LINK: ELEVATED SILVER, BARIUM, STRONTIUM IN ANTLERS,
VEGETATION AND SOILS SOURCED FROM CWD CLUSTER AREAS
I put in a couple of bonus reports: