Cariani, P. A (2002) A
population-interval model for pitch masking. International workshop on
neural coding and perception of pitch, Delmenhorst, Germany, August,
2002. Download PDF (6 Mb)
Auditory nerve simulation (Matlab m-files, see the NSF-BITS Project page).
Recent Papers (with Mark Tramo)
Tramo MJ, Cariani PA, Delgutte B, Braida LD (2001) Neurobiological foundations for the theory of harmony in western tonal music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 930:92-116. (Please email me for a reprint).
Tramo MJT, Cariani P, Delgutte B. Temporal coding of tonal harmony in the auditory nerve. Download PDF
Tramo MJT, Cariani P,
Hackett TA. Spectral and temporal response properties of auditory
cortex neurons in alert macaques. Download
PDF
Other events and publications
Neurosciences symposium on temporal coding
Dr. Ellen Covey and I have organized a symposium on temporal coding of sensory information which will take place at the upcoming Society for Neurosciences meeting in New Orleans.
Tuesday, November 7, 2000
Morial Convention Center, Conference
Auditorium C, New Orleans
Ellen
Covey
INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW
Peter
Cariani
AUDITION
Patricia DiLorenzo
GUSTATION
John
Kauer
OLFACTION
Michael
Shadlen VISION
486.2 TEMPORAL CODING OF PITCH AND
TIMBRE IN THE AUDITORY SYSTEM. Peter Cariani [Abstract,
html]
1:10 PM, Tuesday, November 7, 2000
Morial Convention Center, Conference
Auditorium C, New Orleans
Peter Cariani
This is a less concise version of a minireview on temporal codes that will appear in the journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, in press, early 2001.
Abstract
Physiological and psychophysical evidence for temporal coding
of sensory qualities in different modalities is considered. A space of
pulse codes is outlined that includes 1) channel-codes (across-neural
activation patterns), 2) temporal patterns codes (spike patterns), and
3) spike latency codes (relative spike timings). Temporal codes are
codes in which relative spike timings (rather than spike counts) are
critical to informational function. Stimulus-dependent temporal
patterning of neural responses can arise extrinsically or
intrinsically: through stimulus-driven temporal correlations
(phase-locking), response latencies, or characteristic timecourses of
activation. Phase-locking is abundant in audition, mechanoception,
electroception, proprioception, and vision. In phase-locked systems,
temporal differences between sensory surfaces can subserve
representations of location, motion, and spatial form that can be
analyzed via temporal cross-correlation operations. To phase-locking
limits, patterns of all-order interspike intervals that are produced
reflect stimulus autocorrelation functions that can subserve
representations of form. Stimulus-dependent intrinsic temporal response
structure is found in all sensory systems. Characteristic temporal
patterns that may encode stimulus qualities can be found in the
chemical senses (gustation, olfaction), the cutaneous senses
(nocioception), and some aspects of vision (color, form). In some
modalities (audition, gustation, color vision, mechanoception, pain),
particular temporal patterns of electrical stimulation elicit specific
sensory qualities.
Peter Cariani
To appear in the Biosystems special issue on “Physics and evolution of symbols and codes ”,in press (2001)
Abstract
The work of physicist and theoretical biologist Howard Pattee has focused on the roles that symbols and dynamics play in biological systems.Symbols,as discrete functional switching-states,are seen at the heart of all biological systems in form of genetic codes,and at the core of all neural systems in the form of informational mechanisms that switch behavior.They also appear in one form or another in all epistemic systems,from informational processes embedded in primitive organisms to individual human beings to public scientific models.Over its course,Pattee ’s work has explored 1)the physical basis of informational functions (dynamical vs.rule-based descriptions,switching mechanisms,memory,symbols),2)the functional organization of the observer (measurement,computation),3)the means by which information can be embedded in biological organisms for purposes of self-construction and representation (as codes,modeling relations,memory,symbols),and 4)the processes by which new structures and functions can emerge over time.We discuss how these concepts can be applied to a high-level understanding of the brain.Biological organisms constantly reproduce themselves as well as their relations with their environs.The brain similarly can be seen as a self-producing,self-regenerating neural signaling system and as an adaptive informational system that interacts with its surrounds in order to steer behavior.
Peter Cariani
To appear in the book, Tra segni in the book series Athanor. Semiotica, Filosofia, Arte, Letterature XI, 2, 200 (Meltemi:Rome), 2001.
Abstract
We take
translation as communication that spans different sign-systems to cross
interpretational boundaries. From a communicative-functionalist
perspective, successful translation of a message replicates those
functional states in the receiver that the translator-sender intends.
The task of the translator is to reconstruct a message that was
originally expressed in one sign system such that the rewritten message
can be interpreted in a second sign-system to yield
functionally-analogous effects. The problem of translation is developed
from within basic cybernetic and semiotic frameworks, outlining
different aspects of the semiotic, and how these afford translations
that (at least partially) preserve form, meaning, and/or intent. We
briefly discuss how semiotic linkages can be embodied in adaptive
devices and brains, such that they can be built up over time through
experience. From the adaptive, constructive capacities of individuals
and their social interactions come shared interpersonal and
intersystemic coordinations. Out of these cooperations and behavioral
coordinations, mutual understandings can coevolve. To the extent
that meaning-systems of individuals in a community are largely
congruent (similar observables, socially-calibrated meanings), social
communication can take place within one interpretive framework
without translation. To the extent that individuals and groups
construct their own meaning-systems that differ from those of others,
effective communication necessarily involves translation. Translation
can involve syntactics, semantics, and/or pragmatic aspects of sign
systems. Syntactic translation involves rewriting of the form of the
message, semantic translation the recasting of reference-meanings of a
message into other categories, and pragmatic translation the
reconstruction of one set of valuations into their analogues.