Democracy in America
Alexis de Tocqueville

Probably one of the most insightful books I have read in a long
time. Written in ca. 1830 based on travels to the US de Tocqueville writes his
observations and conclusions about the state of democracy in America while
trying to generalize what this means to the world in general. Being born into a
noble family, but at this time being a government employee of the 2nd French
republic, is a strong supporter of democracy, which he considers to be an
unavoidable conclusion and consequence of the last thousand years of human
evolution and in particular an increasing drive towards equality. He argues that
by observing the state of affairs in America, one can evaluate the merits of
Democracy without the distortions brought about by violent revolutions and a
host of old traditions as it it was the case in Europe. He postulates equality
to be the essential driver in any democratic system - equality leading to
democracy and democracy favoring equality - and argues how the mechanisms and
guiding principles at work affect all aspects of public and private life - how
people think, feel, behave and act.
Being an astute observer de
Tocqueville puts his finger on many points that to a newcomer are still striking
idiosyncrasies of the American society today. Speaking of how ingrained habits
and traditions can be! In other points he has predicted how the forces at work
would drive the American society (or the democratic world in general) towards
certain conclusions - which some can from todays point of view be confirmed. But
also having brought up in a society where equality is explicitly NOT taken for
granted, he adds an outsiders viewpoint to the principles of democracy that we
have lost since any alternative seems unimaginable for us today. He also seems
to experience a similar ambivalence towards the American system as much of the
world conditioned by slightly different traditions, still does today. While on
one hand, he admires the universally high standard of living, wealth and
education, the low rate of cruelty and injustice of the state towards its
citizens or the great energy and enthusiasm which are directed towards improving
peoples (material) lives - on the other hand, he deplores the drive towards
mediocrity and uniformity in the intellectual and cultural live, focus on the
extreme near term with little consideration for the past or future, a lonely
kind of individualism and a single minded concern for material wealth
only.
This abridged version is very readable and should eliminate any
excuses, why this text should not be required reading for anybody who wants to
use worlds like "Freedom" and "Democracy" in any conversation.
Posted: Thu - October 7, 2004 at 11:05 PM