1
g l o b a l i z a t i o n
a n d n e w u r b a n
c o n d i t i o n s
g u s t a v o r i b e i r o
2
People around the globe are more connected to each
other than ever before. Information and money flow more quickly than ever.
Goods and services produced in one part of the world are increasingly available
in all parts of the world.
International travel is more frequent. International
communication is commonplace.
http://globalization.about.com/
3
The Era of Globalization is fast becoming the
preferred term for describing the current times. Just as the Depression, the
Cold War Era, the Space Age, and the Roaring 20's are used to describe
particular periods of history; globalization describes the political, economic,
and cultural atmosphere of today.
http://globalization.about.com/
4
mature industrial economy
post-fordism
late capitalism
privatization
liberalization
deregulation
informational economy restructuring
information technology
network society
network enterprise
5
restructuring from 1970s onwards
from mass-production to flexible production
from fordism to post-fordism
from economies of scale to economies of scope
major divide in the organization of production and
markets in the global economy
diffusion of information technology
uncertainty caused by the fast pace of change in the
economic, institutional and technological environment of the firm by enhancing
flexibility of production, management and marketing.
lean production – automation of jobs, suppression of
managerial layers
Manuel Castells 1996
6

´
7
8

9

10

11

12

13
Politiken 2. section
– Mandag 22. november 2004
Tegnestuefusion
”Arkitema og AA
arkitekter A/S fusionerer. De to århusianske tegnestuer har begge filialer i
København og bliver under fællesnavnet Arkitema til landets største tegnestue
med cirka 230 medarbejdere og en forventet omsætning på cirka 145 millioner
kroner. Fusionen er motiveret i den global økonomis udvikling, som peger på, at
millioner af mennesker i udviklingslandene vil få et velstandsløft med behov
for masser af nye boliger og offentlige bygninger.”
14
6.148 billion
world population 2001
15
By 2030, two out of three people will live in an urban
world, with most of the explosive growth occurring in developing countries.
16

17
1950: New York +
10 M
2015: 21 cities +
10 M
Asia and Africa, now more than two-thirds rural, will
be half urban by 2025.
18
Never have urban populations expanded so fast.
"Humanity has not been down this road before," write urbanists Peter
Hall and Ulrich Pfeiffer. "There
are no precedents, no guideposts."
19

20
m e g a c i t i e s
21


22
Megacities with populations of 10 million inhabitants
or more:
1950: New York, 12.3 million.
1975: Tokyo, 19.8 million; New York, 15.9 million; Shanghai, 11.4 million;
Mexico City, 10.7 million; Sao Paulo, Brazil, 10.3 million.
2001: Tokyo, 26.5 million; Sao Paulo, 18.3 million; Mexico City, 18.3 million;
New York, 16.8 million; Bombay (Mumbai), India; 16.5 million; Los Angeles, 13.3
million; Calcutta, India, 13.3 million; Dhaka, Bangladesh, 13.2 million; Delhi,
India, 13 million; Shanghai, 12.8; Buenos Aires, Argentina, 12.1 million;
Jakarta, Indonesia, 11.4 million; Osaka, Japan, 11 million; Beijing, 10.8
million; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10.8 million; Karachi, Pakistan, 10.4 million;
Manila, Philippines, 10.1 million.
2015: Tokyo, 27.2 million; Dhaka, 22.8 million; Bombay (Mumbai), 22.6 million;
Sao Paulo, 21.2 million; Delhi, 20.9 million; Mexico City, 20.4 million; New
York, 17.9 million; Jakarta, 17.3 million; Calcutta, 16.7 million; Karachi,
16.2 million; Lagos, Nigeria, 16 million; Los Angeles, 14.5 million; Shanghai,
13.6 million; Buenos Aires, 13.2 million; Manila, 12.6 million; Beijing, 11.7
million; Rio de Janeiro, 11.5 million, Cairo, Egypt, 11.5 million; Istanbul,
Turkey, 11.4 million; Osaka, 11 million; Tianjin, China, 10.3 million.
United Nations
Population Division
23
It is this distinctive feature of being globally
connected and locally disconnected, physically and socially, that makes
megacities a new urban form.
Manuel Castells 1996
24
g l o b a l c i t i e s
25
The spatial dispersion of economic activity has
brought about an expansion of central functions and in the growing stratum of
specialized firms servicing such functions… These conditions… shifted the point
of gravity in the industry away from the large, mostly American, transnational
banks that had once dominated the industry toward major centers of
finance.
Saskia Sassen 2001
26
Firms can deliver highly specialized services to
individual clients through network arrangements which allow a large service firm
to contract specialized suppliers and consultants to produce service. This
becomes a version of just-in-time and just-in-place production/ delivery made
possible by the fact that the large global service firm can count on networks
of specific specialized firms…
Saskia Sassen 2001
27
The concept of global city does not refer to any
particular city, but to the global articulation of segments of many cities into
an electronically linked network of functional domination through the planet.
The global city is a spatial form rather than a title of distinction for
certain cities, although some cities have greater share of these global
networks than others. In a sense, most areas in all cities, including New York
and London, are local, not global.
Manuel Castells 2004
28
p a r a d i g m
29
Formerly the dominant forces were separation and
specialisation, the struggle for clarity, and the reduction of the world to
calculable proportions, now we talk about simultaneity, multiplicity,
uncertainty, chaos theory, networks, hubs and nodal points, interaction, the
hybrid, ambivalence, schizophrenia, space of flows, cyborgs, and so on.
van Toorn
30
the predominance of flows, deformations and
dimensional and dynamic heterogeneity within the urban structure of advanced
capitalism puts into question the static spatiality, homogeineity and constancy
of urban form in time that once characterised urban structures and planning
methods.
Alexandro Zaera Polo
31
the generic city
32
The contemporary city is like the contemporary airport
– “all the same”? Is it possible to theorize this convergence? And if so, to
what ultimate configuration is it aspiring? Convergence is possible only at the
price of shedding identity. That is usually seen as a loss. But at the scale at
which it occurs, it must mean something. What are the disadvantages of
identity, and conversely, what are the advantages of blankness? What if this
seemingly accidental – and usually regretted – homogenization were an
intentional process, a conscious movement away from difference toward
similarity? What if we are witnessing a global liberation movement: “down with
character!” What is left after identity is stripped? The Generic?
Rem Koolhaas 1995
33
c
i t y
34
c i t y
35
c i t y
36
c i t y
37
c i t y
38

39
pearl river delta
40
spatial system without a name
41
area: 50,000 km2
pop: +50 million
42
CITY OF EXACERBATED DIFFERENCE © (COED©) The
traditional city strives for a condition of balance, harmony, and a degree of
homogeneity. CITY OF EXACERBATED DIFFERENCE ©, on the contrary, is based on the
greatest possible difference between its parts – complementary or competitive.
In a climate of permanent strategic panic, what counts in the CITY OF
EXACERBATED DIFFERENCE © is not the methodical creation of the ideal, but the
opportunistic exploitation of flukes, accidents, and imperfections. Although
the model of the CITY OF EXACERBATED DIFFERENCE © appears brutal – to depend on
the robustness and primitiveness of its parts – the paradox is that it is, in
fact, delicate and sensitive. The slightest modification of any detail requires
the readjustment of the whole to reassert the equilibrium of complementary
extremes.
Rem Koolhaas
43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50
FLATNESS © The spatial condition of FLATNESS © is a direct result
of the… MARKET © (where mountains are flattened into horizontal surface, to be
consumed by development).
Rem Koolhaas
51

52

53

54
SCAPE © An (exploded) mountain, a highrise, and a rice
field in every direction – nothing between excessive height and the lowness of
a continuous agricultural/light-industrial crust, between the skyscraper and
the scraped. SCAPE © , neither city nor landscape, is the new posturban
condition, the arena for a terminal juxtaposition between architecture and
landscape, the apotheosis of the PICTURESQUE ©
Rem Koolhaas
55

56

57

58

59

60

61
c y b e r c i t i e s
62
h y b r i d
63
The town is the correlate of the road. The town exists
only as a function of circulation and of circuits; it is a singular point on
the circuits which create it and which it creates. It is declined by entries
and exits: something must enter it and exit from it.
Deleuze and Guattari 1997
64
Broadly speaking, the diffusion of ICTs into urban
spaces seem to be involved in trends towards fragmentation, sprawl,
suburbanisation, individualisation and a withdrawal of social and political
interchange from physical spaces into mediated spaces.
Graham and Marvin 2001
65
act on information
pervasiveness of effects of new technologies
networking logic
node: concentration + dispersion
Castells 1996
66

67

68


69


70
city as a communication device
71
cities as sites for information exchange
72
i m a g e c i t y
73
i n f o r m a l
74

75

76

77

78
This tussle between legality and liminality, between
the master plan and the moment is a conflict between different sets of visions,
or images, of the city. One emerges from the panopticon of the state and the
monocular vision of economic or industrial rationality, which renders space an
empty template devoid of lived experience, memory and contingent acts of
living, subservient to the imperatives of administration, commerce and
production.
Others emerge from the many provisional acts of
exploration and redefinition that residents enter into, in the process of
transforming the city into something that makes space for the infinite variety
of their lives, habits and desires.
Raqs Media Collective 2003
79

80
b a n g k o k
81

82
Bangkok gets 300,000 new citizens a year due to
immigration (legal and illegal) and migration from rural areas
http://www.2bangkok.com 2003
The population of Bangkok has practically doubled in
the last 20 years
Estimated at 12 million
83
p l a n n i n g ?
84
Development not unplanned, neither is it haphazard
85


86
c o n n e c t i v i t y
s p e e d
f l o w s p a c e s
87
networked infrastructures (expressways, freeways,
railways, airports, the internet, etc.) can be described as superimposed
systems, which displace conditions of spatial continuity, proximity in
conventional (pre-modern) urban structures (such as streets and squares) and
constitute new topological relationships embodied in flyovers, access ramps,
toll ways, etc. linking well-off suburbs, gated communities to the CBD (central
business district), shopping malls, entertainment zones, and which prioritize
certain connections for certain groups.
88
c o n n e c t i v i t y
s p e e d
f l o w s p a c e s
89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102
c o m p l e x i t y
103

104
Agency Responsibility Reporting
to
BMA Bangkok
Metropolitan Administration Local
Government & Transport Interior
BMRDC Bangkok
Metropolitan Regional
Development
Committee Planning Cabinet
BMTA Bangkok
Mass Transit Authority Bus
Operations Transport
CCCERC Committee
to Consider Construction Planning Cabinet
of
Elevated Roads over Canals
DOH Department
of Highways Highways Transport
DLT Department
of Land transport Regulation Transport
DTCP Department
of Town and Country Planning
Planning Interior
ETA Expressway
and Rapid Transit Authority Expressways
& Mass Transit Interior
HD
Harbour Department Ports Transport
LTPC Land
Transport Policy Committee Planning Cabinet
LTCB Land
Transport Control Board Planning
& Regulation Cabinet
MRTA Metropolitan
Rapid transit Authority Rapid
Transit Cabinet
OCMRT Office
of the Committee for the Management of Road Traffic Planning & Coordination Cabinet
PWD Public
Works Department Local
Roads Interior
SRT State
Railway of Thailand Railways
& Highways on Railway Land Transport
TPD Traffic
Police Department Traffic
Management Interior
Gomez-Ibanez
1997
105


106


107

108
s k y t r a i n
109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116
c o n t r o l
117
118
119
r
o a d
s
120
Obsolete transport infrastructure: Increments and
improvements on the existing transport infrastructure have lagged behind this
accelerated growth the in economy and in the population of Bangkok.
The transport infrastructure has been difficult to
expand due to the fact that the network of primary roads follows mostly the
original system of canals.
121
817 new cars a day
However, new roads have increased 1% during the same
period despite of the fact that 70% of the transportation budget have gone into
road construction and maintenance. 10% is for mass transit and the other 20%
for administration cost.
122
r
i b b
o n
123
Lack of Secondary Roads
Bangkok needs new minor roads connecting with major
roads to break all the dead ends.
Only 6% to 9% of the area of Bangkok is covered by
roads.
Ribbon development with areas inaccessible by
secondary roads.
http://www.2bangkok.com/
2003, Ipland J 2001, Rabibhadana A & Duangwises N 1997
124

125
e x p r e s s w a y s
126

127


128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141
p r i v a t i z a t i o n
142

143

144
p o l a r i z a t i o n
145

146

147

148

149
b y p a s s
150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165
f r a g m e n t a t i o n
166
It’s no longer possible today to establish some form
of continuity, wholeness or totalization, because it will be immediately
obliterated by the system itself.
And it’s in the absolute detail of things that you
ought to be able to find the energy to smash the totality.
Jean Baudrillard
167

168

169
e n v i r o n m e n t
170
2002: 4.79 million reg. vehicles
Bangkok City State of the Environment 2003 UNEP http://www.rrcap.unep.org/reports/soe/bkk_2004_chpt02.pdf
171

172

173
1985: 3,260 tons solid waste/day
2002: 9,472 tons solid waste/day
174

175
sewerage: 2.5 million cubic meters/day
176

177
land subsidence = 1 meter [1978-2003]
178

179

180
c o n s u m p t i o n
181
g l o b a l – l o c a l
182
…infrastructure networks and their access points… tend
to “warp,” “stretch” and “compress” the natural and social spaces and times of
our daily lives, based on who is enrolled into the networks and who remains
physically or technologically disconnected.
Rather than one network being “bigger” than another it
is simply longer or more intensively connected. In this sense a network must
always remain continuously local, as it inevitably touches down in particular
places.
Bruno Latour
183
modern societies cannot be described without
recognising them as having a fibrous, threadlike, wiry, stringy, ropy,
capillary character that is never captured by the notions of levels, layers,
territories, spheres, categories, structure, systems.
Bruno Latour 1997
184

185

186
c l o s u r e
187
Architects condemn plan to close Cambridge school
David Pallister
Monday November 29, 2004
The Guardian
A group of Britain's leading architects today describe as "an act of
extraordinary folly" proposals to close Cambridge University's
much-respected department of architecture because it has failed to meet the
university's research standards.
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/artsandhumanities/story/0,12241,1361902,00.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1361750,00.html
References
Castells M., (1996) The Rise of the Network Society.
Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Castells M., (2004) “Space of flows, space of places:
materials for a theory of urbanism in the information age.” In S. Graham (ed.)
The Cybercities Reader. London: Routledge.
Douglass M
(1998) “East Asian urbanization: patterns, problems, and prospects.” http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/11907/Douglass.pdf
Douglass M (2000) “Mega-urban regions and world city
formation: globalisation, the economic crisis and urban policy issues in
pacific Asia.” Urban Studies, volume 37, number 12, November 1
Graham S, Marvin S (2001) Splintering urbanism. London: Routledge
Hanrou, H
& Obrist, H O (1997) Cities on the Move. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje
Koolhaas, R (2004) Content. Tashen.
Koolhaas R et al (ed.) (2001) Great Leap Forward. Cambridge MA: Harvard
Design School
Koolhaas, R. (2001) Mutations. Actar
Koolhaas, R. (1995) “The Generic City” in R. Koolhaas
& B. Mau (eds.) S, M, L, XL. New York: Monacelli Press.
Kvorning, J. ( 2002) “Restrukturering og byidentitet.” In S. Riesto (ed.)
Europæiske Byer i en Global Era. Copenhagen: Mijøministeriet. p, 50 – p. 57.
Maas,
W. (2002) Five Minutes City: Architecture and Immobility. Rotterdam:
Episode.
Maas, W. (ed.) (1999) Metacity/Datatown. Rotterdam: 010
Publishers.
McGrath, B
(2003) “Bangkok: liquid perception.” In N. Boyarsky and P. Lang (eds.) Urban
Flashes of Asia. London: Wiley-Academy, Architectural Design 78-85.
Polo, A.
(1994) “Order out of chaos.” In J. Woodroffe, D. Papa and I. Macburnie (eds.) ,
The Periphery, London: Wiley/ Architectural Design, 24-9.
Ribeiro, G.
(2002) Bangkok: Informal Space. In P. D. Mortensen & H. Ovensen (eds.)
Byforskningens Rum – Fields of Urban research. Copenhagen: Kunstakademiets
Arkitektskole.
Ribeiro, G.,
Heitmann, C. (2002) “Chiang Mai Transit.” Arkitekten, number
26.
Simons R, Hack G (2001) Global city regions: their
emerging forms. London: Spon Press
Webster D
(2000) Financing city-building: the Bangkok case. http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/11894/Webster.pdf
Webster D
(2002) On the edge: shaping the future of peri-urban East Asia. http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/20031/Webster2002.pdf
Websites
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-2.4/sassen.html
http://www.megacities.uni-koeln.de/
http://www.megacitiesproject.org/perlman.asp
http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/couro2.html
http://globalization.about.com/