<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Northman's Fury</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/NorthmansFury.html</link>
<description>A contrarian product of my own contrariness</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:00:30 -0400</pubDate>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Moved to Newshoggers</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/ilc246153490.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[A very belated announcement, but I'm now doing my regular blogging at Newshoggers.com, link on the sidebar.  This site will remain up for archival purposes only.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:58:10 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Vagaries of Weather</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/ilc238612636.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[A couple of interesting juxtaposed headlines for Iqaluit recently.  First<br />
<br />
<blockquote><b><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2008/07/23/iqaluit-heat.html">Iqaluit sweats in record heat wave</a></b></blockquote><br />
<br />
It turns out that 26.8C is the absolute highest recorded temperature ever in Iqaluit.  It felt hotter.<br />
<br />
The second headline:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><b><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2008/07/23/iqa-ice.html">Ice in Frobisher Bay causing headaches for ships, coast guard</a></b></blockquote><br />
<br />
The second story is a large part of the reason that the Northwest Passage won't become the major shipping route many have speculated for quite some time.  Even if the passage is mostly clear, a strong wind at the wrong time will leave a ship stranded.  Its part of the reason that despite last year's record melting of sea ice, Iqaluit's sea lift was delayed because of ice build-up.<br />
<br />
In any case, it gives me an excuse to post a couple of pictures from Friday's boat trip across the bay, showing some of the berg-lets that probably won't be around much longer.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/.Pictures/P7180044.JPG"><img width="400" src="http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/.Pictures/P7180044.JPG" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/.Pictures/P7180048.JPG"><img width="400" src="http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/.Pictures/P7180048.JPG" /></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:17:15 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shame on you, Elmasry!</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/psk238370441.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/07/21/khadr-elmasry.html">Harper isn't ignoring Kadr</a> because he's brown-skinned or a Muslim.  He's ignoring him because he doesn't want to upset his hero Bush.  The fact that he's brown-skinned and Muslim are just a happy coincidence.<br />
<br />
It's what we get for electing a poodle.]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:00:40 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shorter New York Times</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/ilc238368673.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><b><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/21/new-york-times-rejects-mccain-the-e-mail/">Listen John, we already pay good money for hacks like Bill Kristol to pen attack screeds against Obama.  You're going to have to do better.</a></b></blockquote><br />
<br />
I particularly like this part of the e-mail:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>To that end, the article would have to articulate,
in concrete terms, how Senator McCain defines victory in Iraq. It would
also have to lay out a clear plan for achieving victory — with troops
levels, timetables and measures for compelling the Iraqis to cooperate. And
it would need to describe the Senator's Afghanistan strategy, spelling out
how it meshes with his Iraq plan.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
You want the same kind of space we gave Obama?  Give us a plan like he did, (and preferably one that you didn't just copy from him.)]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:31:12 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Premiers pledge to sit on their hands</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/ilc238180267.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[The headlines sounds good:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><b><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/07/18/premiers-energy.html">20% increase in energy efficiency in 12 years, premiers pledge</a></b></blockquote><br />
<br />
Except that anyone who pays attention to such things knows that increasing efficiency is a far different thing from decreasing overall energy usage.  This allows overall usage to continue to increase, which won't help decrease the cost of energy, even if you do happen to use it more efficiently.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>Nova Scotia Premier Rodney MacDonald said the No. 1 issue facing Canadians this winter is rising energy prices, but the targets the premiers have set out are achievable goals.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
No shit.  In fact, if you look at trends over the <a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2008/02/06/technology-leads-to-big-increase-in-energy-efficiency/">last 20 to 40 years</a>, the "goals" the premiers just set for themselves are <i>below</i> what has been achieved already.  Basically we can expect a 20% increase in energy efficiency without the government doing a damn thing, which gives you an idea of just how much their "pledge" is worth.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:11:07 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Awesome!</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/psk238024212.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[The perfect campaign song for 2008<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/adc3MSS5Ydc&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/adc3MSS5Ydc&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:50:12 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>How to Win Friends the Israeli Way</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/ilc238005964.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Well. this sounds like a brilliant way to <a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=43188">win "hearts and minds"</a>.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>"Israeli military officials have identified Hamas's civilian infrastructure in the West Bank as a major source of the Islamic group's popularity, and have begun raiding and shutting down these institutions in cities like Hebron, Nablus and Qalqilyah.<br />
<br />
"Last week, troops focused their efforts in Nablus, raiding the city hall and confiscating computers. They also stormed into a shopping mall and posted closure notices on the shop windows. A girls' school and a medical centre were shut down in the city, and a charitable association had its computers impounded and documents seized.<br />
<br />
"This policy, officials say, is meant to deny the Islamic group, which is committed to Israel's destruction, the ability to use these institutions as a pipeline by which money is channelled to finance attacks on the Jewish state. But the main goal of this campaign is to stem Hamas's growing popularity in the West Bank, and ensure it does not seize control of the area as it did in Gaza a year ago, when its forces vanquished the more moderate Fatah movement headed by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas...<br />
<br />
"In recent months, the army has also closed down an orphanage, a bakery and other institutions in Hebron, which Israel believes are associated with Hamas. In Gaza, meanwhile, Israel and the Islamic group are observing a truce, but this does not pertain to the West Bank where the Israeli military operates freely."</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
As Brain Ulrich at American Footprints, (where I got the story), <a href="http://americanfootprints.com/drupal/">says</a>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>Are they serious? Having Israel attack Hamas orphanages and medical centers is supposed to make Palestinians turn against Hamas?</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Yeah, I can't imagine how this could possibly go wrong.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:46:04 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Preston Manning as Science Advisor?</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/psk237675665.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><i><a href="http://www.thestar.com/printArticle/458917">The Conservative government has appointed Preston Manning, the founder of the Reform party, to the federal science advisory panel.</a><br />
<br />
Manning joins the Council of Canadian Academies, whose mandate is to provide an "independent, expert assessment of the science underlying pressing issues and matters of public interest," according to its website.<br />
<br />
The group is supposed to "build public confidence that policy and regulatory decisions are being based on broadly accepted scientific knowledge and evidence."</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Now I've always kind of liked Preston Manning.  Back when he was running the Reform Party, I was a supporter and he always seemed a fair bit more rational and honest than most politicians.  (Then Stockwell "The Flintstones is a documentary" Day took over, and the whole Canadian right started going to hell.)  That said, he has no business being a science advisor.  There is little chance of his "advice" being anything but political in nature.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:01:05 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>G8 "Promises" to Cut Emissions . . .</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/psk237398483.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[. . . just not necessarily theirs.<br />
<br />
It's not surprising that <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/07/08/g8-cnd.html">Harper and Co. are touting the agreement</a> as a major step, particularly given it doesn't really require them to do much.  The emissions target is for 2050, without any intermediate targets that they might have to actually work towards meeting while they're in office.  Not only that, but their 50% cut in emissions quite notably lacks a quantifiable number to start with.  If that wasn't enough stupidity, the G8 also passed this little gem:<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>G8 leaders also made a separate statement on oil production, calling on oil-rich nations, including Canada, to ramp up production to bring skyrocketing prices back down.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Because nothing will bring down carbon emissions like more oil!  No wonder they didn't want intermediate targets.<br />
<br />
But no worries!  Our Prime Minister has done the math and found that it isn't us rich, developed countries driving our SUVs that will have to the work on emission cuts.  Nope, we can sit back and let the poor do all the work for us!<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2008/07/09/g8-summit.html">I wish I was kidding</a>.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>As the Group of Eight summit wrapped up in northern Japan on Wednesday, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said it's a "mathematical certainty" that developing countries will do the brunt of the work in lowering global greenhouse gas emissions.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
This must be part of the "new" math, where you pull numbers out of your ass to justify sitting on it.  Then again, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/bush-to-g8-goodbye-from-the-worlds-biggest-polluter-863911.html">look at the guy he's emulating</a>.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>President George Bush signed off with a defiant farewell over his refusal to accept global climate change targets at his last G8 summit.<br />
<br />
As he prepared to fly out from Japan, he told his fellow leaders: "Goodbye from the world's biggest polluter."</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
<i>Chutzpah</i> doesn't begin to cover it.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:01:23 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>If you can't trust industry, who can you trust?</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/psk237312573.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[It appears that Prime Minister "<a href="http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=1f14fa97-f136-4c71-b555-9f9782ac7b48">Yo Harper!</a>" is continuing his Bush-emulating ways, <a href="http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/news/story.html?id=43ff202c-4be8-41d4-9fc6-839ca981f03f">outsourcing food safety to the very companies who are supposed to be regulated</a>, and firing the scientist who stumbled upon the plan.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>Confidential documents insecurely posted on the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's computer network laid out sensitive plans to turn over food inspections and labelling to industry and also led to the firing of the scientist who stumbled upon them.<br />
<br />
Luc Pomerleau, a biologist with a 20-year "unblemished record" in government, said he was fired last week for "gross misconduct' and breaching security because he sent the documents to his union. Pomerleau, who is a union steward, also was deemed "unreliable," which means he no longer has the security clearance to do his job or to work again in the public service.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
It is debatable whether or not this is Pomerleau's fault.  The document was scanned and placed where any of the agencies employees could access it.  As Michele Demers puts it, Pomerleau is being made a scapegoat for the senior manager who had the documents scanned and stored in an unsecured location.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>She said the incident exposed another embarrassing security breach for the government, but the mistake rested with whomever authorized the documents be put on the server. Coincidentally, the circulation of the document came to light the same the week Maxime Bernier resigned from his position as federal affairs minister, after leaving classified documents in the apartment of former girlfriend Julie Couillard.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
And, as has become standard operating procedure in such cases, the government is fast at work trying to figure out new ways to ensure Canadians learn as little as possible about what they're doing.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>Treasury Board is reviewing the government security policy as part of its massive policy review. The new policy, which is being updated to reflect concerns about national security, will tighten rules for sharing classified information, as well how to handle it and destroy it.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
And so, we are unlikely to learn any more about how Canadian's food safety has been compromised until after it's a done deal.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:09:33 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>No enthusiam in military for the North</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/ilc237309264.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Via <a href="http://panglossiannotes.blogs.com/panglossian_notes/2008/07/no-summer-time-arctic-enthusiasm.html">Panglossian Notes</a>, <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080707.wnanook07/BNStory/National/home">this story</a> from the Globe and Mail regarding a serious lack of planning and preparation in last year's "sovereignty exercise"<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>The Canadian Forces have come under fire in an internal report highly critical of military leaders' lack of interest in an Arctic sovereignty protection exercise last August.<br />
<br />
. . .<br />
<br />
It says Canadian military leaders didn't place a high enough priority on the operation, and it singles out for criticism Canada Command, the military organization given the task of defending this country.<br />
<br />
The report says Canada Command failed to issue a set of orders that had been planned to help disseminate instructions on Operation Nanook.<br />
<br />
“[It's] a sad testament to the lack of interest in this operation and its associated training events displayed by the superior HQ that directed it to be conducted in the first place.”</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
As Panglossian Notes says it, perhaps if we told them that the they were headed to a desert thousands of miles away, they would put more effort into it.  After all, that seems to be the kind of missions the folks at HQ are most interested in these days.<br />
<br />
Other than that, this is just the latest in a long line of examples of the federal government talking big about northern sovereignty and other northern issues, but failing to really push for a follow-through.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:14:24 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>And you thought Bush's response to Katrina was slow</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/ilc236972148.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[The Italian government is about to <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/artdesign/story/2008/07/05/pompeii-emergency.html">declare Pompeii a disaster zone</a>, only 1,929 years after the disaster.<br />
<br />
Seriously though, for such an archeological treasure to be used as a garbage dump is simply unforgivable.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:35:47 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Well, they did say it was a stimulus cheque</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/ilc236958770.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<b><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/02/nation-buys-porn-with-sti_n_110457.html">Nation Buys Porn With Stimulus Package</a></b>]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:52:49 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Christian Pranks</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/ilc236865425.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Never heard of this <a href="http://www.prank316.com/">Prank 3:16</a> thing, but this particular prank is funny on a couple of levels.  Convincing somebody who believes in the Rapture that it has happened and that she's been left behind.<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T-v0VHX2Ghc&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/T-v0VHX2Ghc&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:57:04 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Congratulations, Dr. Morgentaler</title>
<link>http://homepage.mac.com/bj_bjornson/blog/psk236814218.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[The US has Roe v. Wade.  Canada has Dr. Henry Morgentaler.  Twenty years ago, he took the fight for abortion rights to the Supreme Court and won.  He's now been named to the Order of Canada, a well-deserved and long-postponed honour for this survivour of Auschwitz.  <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/07/02/f-morgentaler.html">His battle has been a long one</a>, and as might be expected, still capable of generating a great deal of controversy.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>In 1967, Morgentaler made his debut on the national stage and entered the abortion debate in a dramatic way. He testified before a government committee considering changes to the abortion law, advocating that any woman should have the right to end her pregnancy without risking death.<br />
<br />
It was a bold statement. At the time, performing an abortion could land a doctor in jail with a life sentence. Women who had abortions faced imprisonment of up to two years.<br />
<br />
Against that backdrop, Morgentaler at first refused requests to end pregnancies. But by 1969, he said he could refuse no longer. He opened an abortion clinic in Montreal and openly began performing abortions illegally — thousands of them. It was no secret; he gave interviews and even allowed TV news crews to film. He viewed the access to abortion as a simple matter of human rights.<br />
<br />
Condemnation came quickly and on a variety of fronts. It didn’t take long for his first arrest.<br />
<br />
He was subsequently acquitted by a jury. But the Quebec Court of Appeal overturned that acquittal and sentenced him to prison. He served 10 months in Montreal’s Bordeaux Jail.<br />
<br />
The law was eventually changed so that a jury acquittal could no longer be overturned on appeal, another piece of Morgentaler's legacy.<br />
<br />
There would, of course, be many more arrests, two more jury acquittals (one in Quebec and one in Ontario), at least eight raids on his clinics, one firebombing and huge legal bills.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
As you may suspect, there is a lot of teeth-nashing and wailing in certain parts of the political spectrum.  Today comes news that a priest in BC is<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/07/03/priest-order-canada.html"> turning in his OoC</a> so as not to be associated with him.  Granted I enjoyed the Craven Jamboree Father Larre created back when he was in Saskatchewan, but he's <a href="http://thegallopingbeaver.blogspot.com/2008/07/priest-returns-his-order-of-canada-in.html">not exactly the kind of guy I'd want to be associated with</a> anyway.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>Father Larre, on the other hand, is probably best known for being convicted in 1992 on two counts of <a href="http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=746eda0c-11f5-4478-a5a1-77a27d1408f3">physically abusing children in his care</a> at Bosco Homes in Saskatchewan: slapping and choking a female, and forcing another to take pills to teach her a lesson about drug abuse.<br />
<br />
Nine other charges including one of sexual assault were overturned.<br />
<br />
In 1998, Larre registered as a psychologist in B.C., but the B.C. College of Psychologists suspended his registration because it felt he posed "<a href="http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/sc/07/04/2007bcsc0416.htm">an immediate risk to the public</a>."</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
I wonder how many of his fellow OoC recipients are happy he's returned the award?<br />
<br />
As for the oh-so-tolerant Conservatives, they're doing everything in their power to distance themselves from this and <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/story/2008/07/01/morgentaler-order.html">diminish the honour if they can</a>.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>MP Maurice Vellacott, a Conservative from Saskatchewan who opposes abortion, told the Globe and Mail on Monday that he heard Morgentaler's appointment was not unanimous.<br />
<br />
"This is a pretty divisive issue," he said. "I think we can all agree on that, so why would we have the highest honour in the country being issued when there is obviously a strong difference of opinion about it?"</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
A strong difference of opinion over the award?  What do you think Canadians thought about giving the award to <a href="http://www.gg.ca/honours/search-recherche/honours-desc.asp?TypeID=orc&id=3844&lang=e">this guy</a>?  I didn't like him to begin with, and the fact that he destroyed the PC's as a force on the federal level is a major part of the reason the right got taken over by people unwilling to <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/07/02/morgentaler-reax.html">acknowledge the honour</a>.<br />
<br />
<blockquote><i>The Harper government said it had nothing to do with the appointment, which was announced by the Governor General’s office on the advice of a high-powered committee.<br />
<br />
“The Conservative government is not involved in either deliberations or decisions with respect to which individuals are appointed to the Order of Canada,” said a statement issued Tuesday evening by Dimitri Soudas, a spokesman for Harper.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
They do know their base.  On the other hand, I suppose this explains why the Cons are <a href="http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2008/07/03/6053411-cp.html">losing their female supporters</a>.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:43:37 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>