A People's Tragedy by Orlando Figes
finished 11/ 24 ............ non-fiction -
history ................. rating 9
Figes makes the point that the Russian
Revolution was a failure of the People, not the Marxist theorists or the
revolutionaries or the capitalist system but the people of Russia themselves.
He provides an incredible amount of information to back that up and yet, I
somehow feel that to view it that way is blaming the victims and racially or
culturally biased, in a sense.
Anyway, the book rather
arbitrarily deals with the time period between 1893 (serious economic
difficulties) and 1924 (Lenin's death) and that certainly plays into his basic
theme, it focuses on far more than the revolutionaries and Marxism and far less
than the whole history of bloody Tsars. The book also uses biographical
sketches of people who illustrate Figes' point by being close to peasants or
rejecting them.
He also uses
more literary references than most historians (well, naturally, who wrote
"Natasha's Dance"?). Doing that also lends credibility to the idea of the
failure being due to a flaw in the people, because the intellectuals had a
love-hate relationship with the peasants; they loved the idea and hated the
reality.
So yes, Figes does
make his point very clear and I certainly learned a lot about Russian history
regarding the revolution (especially the aftermath) but I'm sure that there are
other interpretations.
Posted: Sat
- December
3, 2005 at 07:47 PM