House of Meetings by Martin Amis
finished 5/5 - ..... contemp fiction .......
rating 9
Incredible book. Powerful, violent, horrific,
mesmerizing. I think the overarching theme may be what happens to love when
murder, torture, rape, slave labor, starvation and general brutality are the
order of the day and virtually necessary for survival.
House of Meetings is essentially a
letter by an unnamed narrator as he travels from the US back to a labor camp in
Siberia where he was interred under Stalin. The letter is to his step-daughter,
Venus, and in it the narrator tries to explain his life as a Soviet soldier in
WWII and a prisoner in a Siberian labor camp afterward. He tells her all about
his life and loves as well as his crimes which may be all part and parcel. Amis
tries to convince the Venus to wear "Eastern eyes" for the tale but I'm not sure
if this is so that she will harden her sensitivities or if it's to not condemn
him too much - possibly both. Accept the brutality in order to forgive him his
part. The cross is mentioned several times with women kissing the Russian cross
and Stalin's widow crossing herself at his funeral (fictional) so it seems as
though the narrator may be asking Venus (a heavenly body) to pray for his soul?
(It might fit.)
The story the
narrator relates to Venus focuses on the complex love/hate relationship of the
narrator for his brother, Lev, a confirmed pacifist in both the war and the
camp, and also for a woman named Zoya who marries Lev. (I think Lev always
loves his brother.) The title of the book comes from the name of the building
where conjugal visits were allowed.
The characters are never really
fully developed, the structure is shredded and the themes of love, forgiveness
and redemption are never quite resolved. But the narrative style is superb
and the book succeeds. In many ways "House of Meetings" reminded me of a
combination of William Vollmann (Europe Central) and Phillip Roth (American
Pastoral); Vollman because of the Russian setting, Roth because of the
intimate and immediate nature of the personal conflict.
There seem to be a lot of layers of
meaning in this book, so it's probably begging for another read. And it has
the sort of encyclopedic feel that makes me want to Google and annotate all the
references. Fwiw, many people, places, incidents are absolutely historical or
literary while others are purely fictional. But there were times when the
literary references and historical references seemed to be a bit overdone.
"We were very late, you see, to
develop a language of feeling; the process was arrested a fter barely a century
, an dnow a ll the implied associations and resonances are lost. I must just
say that it does feel consistently euphemistic - telling my story in English,
and in old-style English. English, what's more. My story would be even worse
in Russian. For it is truly a tale of gutturals and nasals and whistling
sibilants.
Posted: Sat
- May 5, 2007 at 03:29 PM