On Naomi Lebowitz’s Retirement
(April 27, 2000)
 
Naomi

Coming soon to an MLA Jobs Information List near you:

Washington University’s English Department is accepting applications for a tenure-track position in modern narrative. The teaching load is four courses per year, and the successful candidate should plan to design two new courses every year covering the full historical, philosophical, and cross-cultural foundations of modern narrative. Fluency in German and French is required, with additional proficiencies in Latin, Italian, Spanish, Icelandic, Russian, and Hebrew or Provençal preferred. In addition to full advising, committee, and publication responsibilities, the candidate should be prepared to simultaneously orchestrate as many as half-a-dozen dissertations to successful conclusions, returning forty-page chapter drafts an hour after submission with insightful commentary crowding all the margins. As a teacher, the candidate should be capable of inspiring a roomful of undergraduate non-majors to tears while presenting the final chapters of Don Quixote. The candidate should also maintain active correspondences with dozens of former students, colleagues, and dissertation advisees, not to mention any residents of the White House who find themselves under seditious attack by a Republican Congress. The candidate can also expect to serve as the department’s resident movie critic, C-Span monitor, and amateur baseball scout, delivering regular updates on the most promising prospects in the St. Louis Cardinals’ farm system. Duties as the university’s and the neighborhood’s moral conscience may include the drafting of passionate letters to the chancellor on the need to preserve all trees threatened by parking lot expansion, devoted patronage of local non-chain bookstores, and regular walks of any under-exercised dogs within a one-mile radius of home. Candidates who are invited to campus for interviews may be required to deliver a 50-minute lecture (without notes) on one of two topics: (1) Yeats, Irish folk tradition, and the designated hitter rule or (2) the Dachshund as Conrad’s Ubermensch. Alternatively, the candidate could provide his or her own accompaniment on the cello while singing “Funiculi Funicula” in Yiddish and juggling the complete correspondence of Henry James, blindfold.

Rank open.

 
How in the world could we ever dream of replacing Naomi? Who would be crazy enough to try to bear up under a fraction of the chapeaux she so ably wears, the five hundred hats of Naomi Lebowitz? A prodigy of curiosity and passion, a mentor, mystic, and delightfully bubbly muse, Naomi has been the animating spirit of Duncker Hall from the moment she set foot in it, just as she is in any building, any party, any gathering lucky enough to include her. When the time comes to sign up for the departmental potluck, the rest of us just write “mushroom curry” or “pasta salad” under the column heading “Dish.” Only Naomi, of course, can simply write “Myself.”
           
Some of you in this room may not have had the pleasure of taking a class with the English Department’s resident Eighth Wonder of the World. Those of us who count ourselves among the illuminati cannot but feel sorry for the rest of you. Imagine hopping aboard the Millennium Falcon for a warp-speed run through an asteroid belt of European masters, careening in and among Flaubert, Nietzsche, Dinesen, Rousseau, Hardy, Joyce, Ibsen, and Moliere and somehow emerging an hour-and-a-half later exhausted but exhilarated, blessed with a greater appreciation not only for the enormity and complexity of the course you have just mapped, but also for the skill of the daredevil pilot who has somehow conducted you through the intricate gauntlet with such remarkable speed and facility. I once ran into a fellow graduate student on his way home from class several years after he had completed his course work. I was surprised to learn that he was still sitting in on classes at that point, until he mentioned that it was Naomi’s lecture that had drawn him away from his dissertation post. As he put it – and as I couldn’t help agreeing – Naomi’s class offered far richer entertainment than anything on television.
           
To those of you who haven’t yet struck up a correspondence with Naomi, let me heartily recommend that you do so. One of Lynnea’s and my great pleasures during our two-year stint in the Ozarks was the regular arrival of Naomi’s letters, which we would pass back and forth at the dinner table, reading and re-reading our favorite parts aloud to each other. Naomi always confined herself to a single sheet of paper in her letters, but just barely, the thoughts, terms, and ideas pouring out of her in remarkable profusion and profundity. Of the innumerable gems that strewed her letters to us, I’ve culled just one to share with you, her response to the news that I would be delivering a chapel talk. She wrote,
 
       I had a funny pang when you said you were to give a chapel sermon. We had those at Wellesley when I was an undergraduate and, being a Rabbi’s daughter, bored with [the] service but drawn to powerful sermons (my father was a great sermonizer) I was crushed that I was never asked to give one (I think there was a lot of anti-Semitism going around, but I was so naïve. Being the Chief-Jew’s daughter in U. City, I rarely heard it as a child just as Jesse Jackson’s kids never got pelted in Hymietown.) & to this day [I] long to belt one forth in the style of Donne or Bossuet. I think I could have been very happy as an English teacher at a prep school in the 1930’s. There’s that streak in me.
 
Going back through her letters to select an excerpt for this tribute, I resolved once again to subordinate all professional goals to the simple intention to live long enough to see Naomi become an old person. But the truth is, I can’t imagine that I’ll ever achieve that goal.
           
Like most of you, I have a thousand more Naomi stories I’d love to share. One thing I had hoped to do was to use her teaching copy of Rousseau or Montaigne – holy relics of this profession – to demonstrate the meaning of the word “Naomified,” but I’m already over time. So let me close with a comment by Larry Ross, the English Department’s long-time Shakespeare professor who passed away a few years ago. Those of you who knew Larry may recall that he was willing, every now and then, to weigh in with critical opinions on most things under the sun, especially when the topic in question bore the slightest whiff of modernism, a period he didn’t have much use for, to put it kindly. But whenever a conversation with Larry was growing a bit too strident for comfort, I knew that all I had to do to disarm him completely was to invoke the name of the department’s senior modernist. “Naomi,” he would say, with sincere gratitude and rare reverence inflecting his tone, “Now there’s a beautiful woman. I mean that, a beautiful woman – a beautiful person.” To quote Molly Bloom – yes.
           
I don’t envy the search committee.
 
Thank you, Naomi – for everything.

Back to Brian or main directory