Title's a little scary, isn't it? People don't
like that word "dictated." Don't really like "morality" either, in general.
The former brings up images of strange European heads of state, standing on
balconies and shouting and gesticulating at a mass of people to frightened to do
anything but cheer. The latter calls to mind Catholic school nuns with rulers,
or little old lady Sunday school teachers, or presidents who don't know what
doesn't belong in the U.S. Constitution... Oh darn. How on earth did that slip
in there?
Unfortunately, "morality"
does not bring up any image associated with Asatru. The Nine Noble Virtues may
be a great code to live by, but they are not a moral code -- or at least, not a
definite one. Not like the Ten Commandments, in a "Thou shalt not" sense.
"So what," you ask me. "You yourself,
when comparing the Nine Noble Virtues with the Ten Commandments skipped right
over the obvious difference (that there are 10 Commandments and only 9 Virtues;
sorry; that's been bothering me ever since), and said that we don't need a
strict moral law if we follow the virtues, because they extoll right action."
Yep. You're absolutely right. I said that. If you look inside the NNV, you
find a very strict code of moral
behavior.
So why aren't we more moral?
If we follow the NNV, and they are the basis of right action, then why do we
have prison Asatru? Will an Asatru cheat on his taxes? Absolutely. Heathens
cheat on their spouses, call in sick when they're not, and do all the generally
immoral things that are performed in everyday society, by those who have no
concept of honor.
We should be better
than that. We should be better than THEM! Why aren't
we?
I can think of quite a few reasons
for this (Oh boy. You can smell the list coming, can't you? Yep. Definitely
list time).
1. The type of
people we're attracting. These are people who
broke away from a religion, probably not very recently. They're not used to
having any moral compass except their own sense of right and wrong. If that was
based in their previous religion, then it might have been broken during the
transition.
Well, what can we do about
that? Stop allowing newcomers? Shut down the religion like the Shakers and
gradually die out? Well, no. We need to make it clear from the start that
heathenry is about morality. We're not a "If you don't hurt anyone, do what you
want" religion. Maybe it works fine in other contexts. It doesn't work for
us.
2. Unbalanced moral
halves. OK, this is a great description.
Morality has two parts. First, there's the part that is dependent on and
reflective of our self-esteem. This is the morality of "I don't do this because
I want to be able to look in the mirror without flinching." Then there's the
morality that is dependent on and reflective of the view of society, as in "I
don't do this because I want to be able to hold my head up in the
community."
Nothing earth-shattering so
far. Here's the bit: There's a little system of checks and balances between
the two. Here's an example. I can cheat on my taxes. I would feel no real
personal guilt over this, because I feel that I paid enough to the government
last year to make up for not paying as much this year. However, I know that I
might get caught and have to go to court, pay a large fine, and face jail time.
The amount of face I would lose in the community keeps me from doing something
that would not affect my self-esteem. Or the other way around: I witness a
crime of some sort. Few people in society would blame me if I just went on my
way and did nothing. However, because I will feel guilt and be unable to face
myself, I go to the police and report what I
saw.
So what could cause this system to
become unbalanced? Someone with extremely low self-esteem is hardly going to be
made to feel worse about himself no matter what he does. Or, the person might
have such a high opinion of himself that he can justify anything he does in his
own mind. In that case, they don't have the internal check on their actions.
On the other hand, someone might be insensitive to the pressure of society, or
might be living in a community with a depressed moral standard. This prevents
them having the external check on their
actions.
What can we do about this?
Well, firstly, we have to foster within heathens honesty with themselves.
Neither low nor high self-esteem is desirable; but an accurate picture of one's
self and one's actions. Through this, the internal moral compass becomes
balanced. If we are required by circumstances to live in areas with low moral
standards, then we must be very careful to keep our standards high in spite of
those around us. The heathen in this situation must set himself morally above
those around him, and must consider how those people will crow about it if he
sinks to their level. Sounds snobby? Well, yeah, it is. It's also
necessary.
3. Unspecified
morals. The NNV are nine words. Without
common concepts to go with those words, they are nothing but nine words. Honor,
for example. To live my life with honor, I have to come up with what it means
to live honorably. To be truthful, I must establish what the truth is. Is
lying by omission acceptable? There's an old song from the musical "Kiss Me
Kate," the chorus of which is "But I'm always true to you darling in my fashion
/ Yes I'm always true to you darling in my way." Is that good enough? Probably
not.
We need some kind of concensus.
All heathenry hasn't even decided on the value of the Nine Noble Virtues yet.
Perhaps we should skip the easy stuff and go straight back to the Havamal, the
closest thing we have to a set moral code. At least then there would be less
room for interpretaion, except for the original interpretation into
English.
4. Acceptance within
heathenry of moral standards contraindicated by the Lore.
We as heathens are a fairly tolerant bunch.
We accept a lot of behavior that is not necessarily acceptable according to the
Lore. Part of the problem is the idea of using the Sagas as a moral compass.
The Sagas are in many ways like soap operas. While you might fantasize about
living a life like "Days of Our Lives," from a moral point of view, one must
realize that it isn't a good idea. Same with the Sagas. They're spicy, and
although based on true stories, have of course been made more interesting -- the
bad guys are badder and the good guys are gooder. This is just one way in which
we become accustomed to accepting things outside our
morality.
In order to prevent this, we
have to put our feet down. State outright "I'm afraid that behavior is
unacceptable to me because ______." Yeah, I know. Sounds prudish. You can
find other ways to make it clear, of
course.
As one of the celebrated
professors at my college once stated, "We live in a world." (He was actually
going to go on, but paused just a little too long for effect, allowing a large
number of people, myself included, the time required to begin applauding his
statement.) I would alter that slightly and expand upon it. We live in a
country. *applause* that is founded on Christian morality. Our laws are based
in Christian morality. Therefore... remember that system of checks and balances
in that idea I liked so much? Yeah. This has a profound effect on
that.
Because the morals of our society
are Christian-based (although, it must be noted, those morals are slipping), the
external check on our moral system is at their level of morality. Our inner
moral compass, however, should be heathen (That's a process, of course, and not
something that is arrived at overnight). Therefore, based on the above system,
whichever moral code is stricter in a
given situation should be the one that wins
out.
Note the use of the word
"should." We have people within heathenry who are here because they are
rebelling against society's moral standards. At the same time, they are not
taking on a heathen moral code. Thus there is little they are unwilling to do
because of moral objections. There may be other factors which prevent certain
actions (such as fear of punishment), but no inner compass or outer pressures
guide them.
This is what we have to
stop. We must impress on newbies and members alike that we are still a part of
society, and that we have our own morals and values as well. I don't know how
else to say this.
Morality is
personal, but it must be dictated so that it can become personal. This is
something we are currently missing, and that is partially because of a tendency
to accept anyone who wants to become Asatru. We have to be selective.
Otherwise we are just a whitened
sepulchre.
Feel free to submit comments
calling me a prude if you wish. This isn't an easy subject, of course, and this
is just one opinion on a few facets of it. If it makes you think, it's done its
job. If you agree with it, then it's gone beyond its job.